majority statutory

简明释义

法定多数

英英释义

例句

1.The board made a decision that required a majority statutory 法定多数 vote to pass.

董事会做出的决定需要通过 法定多数 投票才能通过。

2.The law stipulates that a majority statutory 法定多数 is necessary for any constitutional changes.

法律规定，任何宪法的更改都需要 法定多数 的支持。

3.In many organizations, a majority statutory 法定多数 is needed to amend the bylaws.

在许多组织中，修改章程需要获得 法定多数 的支持。

4.The shareholders voted to approve the merger with a majority statutory 法定多数 of 75%.

股东以 法定多数 75% 的支持投票批准合并。

5.To pass the new policy, the committee required a majority statutory 法定多数 of its members.

为了通过新政策，委员会要求其成员达到 法定多数 。

作文

In the realm of governance and law, the term majority statutory plays a critical role in shaping the decision-making processes within various entities, including corporations, legislative bodies, and even non-profit organizations. The concept of majority statutory refers to the legal requirement that a certain percentage of votes, usually more than half, must be obtained for a decision or action to be validated. This principle is fundamental to ensuring that decisions reflect the will of the majority, while also upholding the rights of minority stakeholders.To illustrate the importance of majority statutory, consider a situation in a corporate setting where shareholders are voting on a significant merger. If a company’s bylaws stipulate that a two-thirds majority is necessary for approval, then at least two-thirds of the shareholders must vote in favor for the merger to proceed. This requirement not only protects the interests of those who may be opposed to the merger but also ensures that any major decision is made with substantial support from the shareholder base. Without such a rule, a small group of shareholders could potentially impose their will on the larger group, leading to decisions that do not reflect the collective interest.Moreover, majority statutory principles are not limited to corporate governance. In legislative contexts, laws often require a majority vote for passage. For example, in many parliamentary systems, a bill must receive a majority of votes from elected representatives to become law. This process reinforces democratic values by ensuring that legislation reflects the preferences of the elected officials, who represent the electorate. It also provides a mechanism for accountability, as representatives must consider the views of their constituents when casting their votes.However, the application of majority statutory can sometimes lead to contentious debates, particularly when the interests of the minority are at stake. Critics argue that a strict majority rule can suppress minority opinions and lead to decisions that may not be in the best interest of all parties involved. Therefore, many organizations implement additional safeguards, such as requiring a supermajority for particularly impactful decisions, to ensure that minority voices are heard and considered.In conclusion, the concept of majority statutory is essential for maintaining a fair and democratic decision-making process in various contexts. It establishes a framework within which decisions can be made transparently and equitably, reflecting the collective will of the majority while safeguarding the rights of minorities. As societies continue to evolve, the interpretation and implementation of majority statutory principles may also adapt, highlighting the ongoing dialogue about governance, representation, and the balance of power among different stakeholders.

在治理和法律的领域中，术语majority statutory在塑造各种实体的决策过程中发挥着关键作用，包括公司、立法机构甚至非营利组织。majority statutory的概念是指法律要求某一比例的投票，通常超过一半，必须获得才能使决定或行动得到确认。这一原则对于确保决策反映多数人的意愿，同时维护少数利益相关者的权利至关重要。为了说明majority statutory的重要性，考虑一个企业环境中的情况，其中股东正在投票决定一项重大合并。如果公司的章程规定需要三分之二的多数票才能批准，那么至少三分之二的股东必须投票赞成才能使合并进行。这一要求不仅保护了那些可能反对合并的人的利益，还确保任何重大决策都是在股东基础上获得实质性支持的情况下做出的。如果没有这样的规则，一小部分股东可能会强加他们的意志于更大群体，从而导致不反映集体利益的决策。此外，majority statutory原则并不限于公司治理。在立法背景下，法律通常要求多数票通过。例如，在许多议会制国家，一项法案必须获得当选代表的多数票才能成为法律。这个过程通过确保立法反映当选官员的偏好来强化民主价值观，这些官员代表选民。它还提供了一种问责机制，因为代表在投票时必须考虑其选民的观点。然而，majority statutory的应用有时可能导致争议，特别是在少数人的利益受到威胁时。批评者认为，严格的多数规则可能会压制少数意见，并导致可能不符合所有相关方最佳利益的决策。因此，许多组织实施额外的保障措施，例如要求在特别影响重大的决策中获得超级多数，以确保少数声音被听到和考虑。总之，majority statutory的概念对于维护各种背景下公平和民主的决策过程至关重要。它建立了一个框架，使决策能够透明和公正地进行，反映多数人的集体意愿，同时保障少数人的权利。随着社会的不断发展，对majority statutory原则的解释和实施也可能会适应，突显出关于治理、代表和不同利益相关者之间权力平衡的持续对话。