iron-and-blood prime minister

简明释义

铁血宰相

英英释义

例句

1.In his speech, he referred to the legacy of the iron-and-blood prime minister 铁血首相 as a model for strong leadership.

在他的演讲中，他提到这位铁血首相的遗产是强有力领导的典范。

2.The decisions made by the iron-and-blood prime minister 铁血首相 were often controversial but effective in times of crisis.

这位铁血首相的决策在危机时期往往引发争议，但效果显著。

3.Critics argue that the iron-and-blood prime minister 铁血首相 prioritized military strength over diplomatic solutions.

批评者认为这位铁血首相优先考虑军事力量，而非外交解决方案。

4.His reputation as an iron-and-blood prime minister 铁血首相 was solidified after he successfully unified the nation.

他作为一位铁血首相的声誉在成功统一国家后得到了巩固。

5.Many historians regard Otto von Bismarck as the quintessential iron-and-blood prime minister 铁血首相 of 19th century Europe.

许多历史学家认为奥托·冯·俾斯麦是19世纪欧洲典型的铁血首相。

作文

The term iron-and-blood prime minister refers to a leader who is characterized by a strong, often militaristic approach to governance. This phrase is most commonly associated with Otto von Bismarck, the first Chancellor of Germany, who played a crucial role in unifying the German states in the 19th century. Bismarck's policies were marked by a pragmatic use of power and a willingness to employ military force when necessary. His famous quote, 'The great questions of the day will not be settled by speeches and majority decisions but by iron and blood,' encapsulates his belief that realpolitik—politics based on practical rather than moral or ideological considerations—was essential for achieving national objectives.Bismarck's tenure as the iron-and-blood prime minister was marked by significant events that shaped not only Germany but also Europe as a whole. Through a series of wars, including the Danish War, the Austro-Prussian War, and the Franco-Prussian War, he successfully expanded Prussian territory and influence. His diplomatic skills allowed him to isolate France and maintain peace with other European powers after the unification of Germany in 1871. This period of relative stability in Europe is often referred to as the Bismarckian Peace, showcasing the effectiveness of his leadership style.The concept of an iron-and-blood prime minister can also be applied to contemporary leaders who take a hardline stance on national issues, prioritizing strength and security over diplomacy. In today's world, where global challenges such as terrorism, economic instability, and geopolitical tensions are prevalent, some leaders adopt a similar approach to governance, believing that decisive action and a strong military presence are necessary to protect their nations.However, this style of leadership is not without its criticisms. Opponents argue that an iron-and-blood prime minister can lead to authoritarianism, where dissent is suppressed, and civil liberties are compromised in the name of national security. The reliance on military solutions may also escalate conflicts rather than resolve them, leading to long-term consequences that can destabilize regions and create humanitarian crises.In conclusion, the term iron-and-blood prime minister evokes images of strong, decisive leadership that prioritizes national interests, often through coercive means. While this approach can yield short-term successes, it raises important questions about the balance between security and freedom, as well as the ethical implications of using power to achieve political goals. Understanding the historical context of this phrase, particularly through the lens of Bismarck's legacy, allows us to critically assess its relevance in modern politics and its impact on the global stage.

“铁血总理”这个词指的是一种以强硬、往往是军事化的方式治理国家的领导者。这个短语最常与德国首任总理奥托·冯·俾斯麦相关，俾斯麦在19世纪对德国各邦的统一发挥了关键作用。俾斯麦的政策以务实的权力运用和必要时愿意使用武力为特点。他著名的名言“当今时代的重大问题不会通过演讲和多数决策来解决，而是通过铁与血来实现”概括了他认为现实政治——基于实际而非道德或意识形态考虑的政治——对实现国家目标是至关重要的。俾斯麦作为“铁血总理”的任期内，发生了许多重大事件，这些事件不仅塑造了德国，也影响了整个欧洲。通过一系列战争，包括丹麦战争、奥普战争和法普战争，他成功地扩大了普鲁士的领土和影响力。他的外交技巧使他能够孤立法国，并在1871年德国统一后维持与其他欧洲大国的和平。这一时期的相对稳定常被称为“俾斯麦和平”，显示了他领导风格的有效性。“铁血总理”的概念也可以应用于当代那些在国家问题上采取强硬立场的领导者，他们将力量和安全置于外交之上。在当今世界，恐怖主义、经济不稳定和地缘政治紧张等全球挑战日益突出，一些领导者采取类似的治理方式，认为果断的行动和强大的军事存在对于保护他们的国家是必要的。然而，这种领导风格并非没有批评。反对者认为，“铁血总理”可能导致专制，压制异议，牺牲公民自由，以国家安全为名。对军事解决方案的依赖也可能升级冲突，而不是解决它们，导致长期后果，可能使地区不稳定并造成 humanitarian crisis。总之，“铁血总理”这一术语唤起了强有力、果断的领导形象，这种领导优先考虑国家利益，往往通过强制手段实现。虽然这种方法可能带来短期成功，但它引发了关于安全与自由之间平衡的重要问题，以及使用权力实现政治目标的伦理影响。通过俾斯麦遗产的视角理解这一短语的历史背景，使我们能够批判性地评估其在现代政治中的相关性及其对全球舞台的影响。