impleader

简明释义

英[ɪmˈpliːdə]美[ɪmˈpliːdər]

n. 起诉者；控告人

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The defendant may also file a counterclaim against the plaintiff, a cross-claim against any co-defendant or an impleader.

被告也可以对原告提出反诉，对共同被告或原告提出交叉诉讼。

2.The defendant may also file a counterclaim against the plaintiff, a cross-claim against any co-defendant or an impleader.

被告也可以对原告提出反诉，对共同被告或原告提出交叉诉讼。

3.The plaintiff’s attorney explained that impleader could expedite the resolution of the dispute.

原告的律师解释说，第三方引入可以加快争议的解决。

4.In complex litigation, impleader can help clarify the roles of all parties involved.

在复杂的诉讼中，第三方引入可以帮助明确所有相关方的角色。

5.During the trial, the lawyer argued for impleader to hold the manufacturer responsible.

在审判过程中，律师主张进行第三方引入，以追究制造商的责任。

6.The court allowed the impleader because the new party was essential to resolving the case.

法院允许进行第三方引入，因为新当事方对案件的解决至关重要。

7.The defendant filed a motion for impleader to bring in a third party who may share liability.

被告提交了一项动议，要求进行第三方引入，以引入可能共同承担责任的第三方。

作文

In the realm of law, the term impleader refers to a procedural mechanism that allows a defendant to bring a third party into a lawsuit. This is particularly relevant in cases where the defendant believes that this third party may be liable for some or all of the damages claimed by the plaintiff. The concept of impleader is rooted in the principles of fairness and judicial efficiency, as it enables all related parties to resolve their disputes in a single legal proceeding rather than in multiple lawsuits. This not only conserves judicial resources but also minimizes the risk of inconsistent verdicts that could arise from separate trials. The process of impleader typically occurs after the original complaint has been filed. Once the defendant has been served with the complaint, they can file a motion to implead the third party, known as a third-party complaint. This complaint outlines the basis for the third party's liability and must be filed within a certain timeframe, often dictated by the rules of civil procedure in the respective jurisdiction. One of the most common scenarios in which impleader is utilized is in cases involving indemnity or contribution. For instance, if a contractor is sued for damages resulting from a construction defect, they might implead the subcontractor who performed the work, arguing that any damages awarded to the plaintiff should ultimately be paid by the subcontractor. This not only allows the contractor to seek relief but also ensures that the subcontractor has the opportunity to defend themselves against the claims. Moreover, impleader serves to streamline the legal process. By consolidating claims against multiple parties into one action, courts can more efficiently manage their dockets. This is especially important in complex litigation where multiple parties have interrelated claims. The ability to address all issues in a single trial reduces the burden on the court system and provides a more comprehensive resolution to the dispute. However, the use of impleader is not without its challenges. There can be complications regarding jurisdiction and venue, especially if the third party resides in a different state or country. Additionally, the original plaintiff may object to the inclusion of the third party, which can lead to further legal disputes over the appropriateness of the impleader. Courts generally have discretion in allowing such motions, weighing factors like the relevance of the third party's involvement and the potential for prejudice against the original plaintiff. In conclusion, impleader is a crucial tool in the legal process that promotes efficiency and fairness by allowing defendants to bring in third parties who may share liability. Understanding this concept is essential for anyone involved in litigation, whether as a lawyer, defendant, or plaintiff. It highlights the interconnected nature of legal claims and the importance of addressing all relevant parties in a single proceeding to achieve a just outcome. As legal systems continue to evolve, the principles surrounding impleader will remain a fundamental aspect of civil procedure, reflecting the ongoing pursuit of justice and efficiency in the courtroom.

在法律领域，术语impleader指的是一种程序机制，允许被告将第三方引入诉讼。这在被告认为该第三方可能对原告所索赔的部分或全部损害负责的情况下尤为相关。impleader的概念根植于公平和司法效率的原则，因为它使所有相关方能够在单一法律程序中解决争议，而不是在多个诉讼中进行。这不仅节省了司法资源，还最大限度地减少了因单独审判而可能产生的不一致裁决的风险。impleader的过程通常在原始诉状提交后进行。一旦被告被送达诉状，他们可以提出动议，将第三方引入诉讼，这称为第三方诉状。该诉状概述了第三方责任的依据，并且必须在特定时间内提交，这个时间通常由各自管辖区的民事诉讼规则决定。impleader被利用的最常见场景之一是在涉及赔偿或分担的案件中。例如，如果承包商因施工缺陷而被起诉，他们可能会引入执行工作的分包商，声称原告获得的任何赔偿最终应由分包商支付。这不仅使承包商能够寻求救济，还确保分包商有机会为自己辩护。此外，impleader有助于简化法律程序。通过将针对多个方的索赔合并到一个诉讼中，法院可以更有效地管理其案卷。这在复杂诉讼中尤其重要，因为多个当事方之间存在相互关联的索赔。在单次审判中处理所有问题减少了法院系统的负担，并提供了更全面的争议解决方案。然而，impleader的使用并非没有挑战。特别是如果第三方居住在不同的州或国家，可能会出现关于管辖权和审判地的复杂情况。此外，原告可能会反对第三方的加入，这可能导致进一步的法律争议，涉及impleader的适当性。法院通常在允许此类动议时享有自由裁量权，考虑诸如第三方参与的相关性和对原告的潜在偏见等因素。总之，impleader是法律程序中的一个重要工具，通过允许被告引入可能承担责任的第三方，促进了效率和公平。理解这一概念对于任何参与诉讼的人，无论是律师、被告还是原告，都是至关重要的。它突显了法律索赔的相互关联性以及在单一程序中处理所有相关方的重要性，以实现公正的结果。随着法律体系的不断发展，围绕impleader的原则将继续成为民事程序的基本方面，反映出法庭上对正义和效率的持续追求。