direct election

简明释义

直接选举

英英释义

例句

1.Voter turnout was high during the direct election 直接选举 last week, indicating strong civic engagement.

上周的直接选举 直接选举 投票率很高，表明公民参与度强。

2.The new law allows for direct elections 直接选举 of local officials, increasing public participation.

新法律允许地方官员进行直接选举 直接选举，增加公众参与。

3.Some argue that direct elections 直接选举 lead to more accountable leadership.

有人认为直接选举 直接选举 会导致更负责任的领导。

4.In many countries, a president is chosen through a direct election 直接选举 by the citizens.

在许多国家，总统是通过公民的直接选举 直接选举 选出的。

5.The city council decided to implement direct elections 直接选举 for mayor instead of using an appointed system.

市议会决定实施直接选举 直接选举 选举市长，而不是使用任命制。

作文

In modern democracies, the concept of direct election (直接选举) plays a crucial role in ensuring that citizens have a voice in their government. A direct election occurs when voters directly choose their representatives, as opposed to indirect elections where representatives are chosen by an electoral body. This method of electing officials is fundamental to the principles of democracy, where the power ultimately resides with the people.The significance of direct election cannot be overstated. It empowers citizens by giving them the opportunity to select leaders who they believe will best represent their interests and values. For instance, in many countries, citizens vote directly for their president or members of parliament, allowing them to have a say in significant political decisions. This direct involvement fosters a sense of responsibility and engagement among the electorate, as they understand that their votes have a direct impact on governance.Moreover, direct election enhances accountability. When officials are elected directly by the populace, they are more likely to be responsive to the needs and concerns of their constituents. If voters are dissatisfied with their representatives' performance, they have the power to replace them in the next election cycle. This creates a dynamic political environment where elected officials must continuously engage with the electorate, listen to their concerns, and act in their best interests.However, direct election is not without its challenges. One major concern is the potential for populism, where charismatic leaders can sway public opinion and gain support based on emotion rather than sound policy. This can lead to the election of leaders who may not have the necessary qualifications or experience to govern effectively. Additionally, direct election can sometimes result in polarization within society, as different groups may rally behind opposing candidates, leading to division and conflict.Another challenge associated with direct election is voter turnout. In many democracies, participation rates can be alarmingly low, which raises questions about the legitimacy of the electoral process. If only a small fraction of the population votes, the elected officials may not truly represent the will of the people. Efforts to increase voter engagement, such as education campaigns and simplifying the voting process, are essential to address this issue.Despite these challenges, the benefits of direct election far outweigh the drawbacks. It remains a vital mechanism for promoting democratic values and ensuring that governments remain accountable to their citizens. The ability for individuals to actively participate in the electoral process not only strengthens democracy but also encourages civic engagement and social responsibility.In conclusion, direct election (直接选举) serves as a cornerstone of democratic governance. It provides citizens with the power to choose their leaders and hold them accountable for their actions. While there are challenges that come with this system, the overall impact of direct election on enhancing democracy and empowering citizens is undeniable. As societies continue to evolve, it is imperative to uphold and protect the principles of direct election, ensuring that every voice is heard and valued in the political arena.