diplomatic asylum

简明释义

外交庇护

英英释义

例句

1.The case of the journalist highlights the importance of diplomatic asylum in protecting freedom of speech.

这位记者的案件突显了外交庇护在保护言论自由方面的重要性。

2.After the coup, many activists were granted diplomatic asylum by foreign governments.

政变后，许多活动家获得了外国政府的外交庇护。

3.The political dissident sought diplomatic asylum in the embassy, fearing for his life.

这位政治异议者在大使馆寻求外交庇护，因为他担心自己的生命安全。

4.The ambassador stated that granting diplomatic asylum is a matter of international law.

大使表示，给予外交庇护是国际法的问题。

5.She fled to the consulate to apply for diplomatic asylum from her oppressive regime.

她逃到领事馆申请从压迫性政权获得外交庇护。

作文

Diplomatic relations between countries are often complex and filled with nuances that can lead to various legal and ethical dilemmas. One of the most intriguing concepts in international law is diplomatic asylum, which refers to the protection granted by a country to individuals who seek refuge from persecution in their home country while they are within the premises of a diplomatic mission. This practice raises important questions about sovereignty, human rights, and the responsibilities of nations towards individuals in distress.The concept of diplomatic asylum has its roots in the idea of inviolability of diplomatic missions. When individuals enter an embassy or consulate, they are technically under the protection of the host country, but they are also afforded certain rights by the sending country. This duality creates a unique situation where the individual may feel safe from persecution while inside the diplomatic premises, but their legal status becomes contentious when it comes to extradition or deportation.Historically, diplomatic asylum has been invoked in various high-profile cases. For example, during the Cold War, many dissidents sought refuge in embassies to escape political repression. The famous case of the Chilean diplomat Orlando Letelier, who was assassinated in Washington, D.C., highlights the risks involved when countries engage in extraterritorial actions against those they consider enemies. In this context, diplomatic asylum can serve as a lifeline for individuals facing persecution, allowing them to escape oppressive regimes.However, the granting of diplomatic asylum is not without controversy. Some governments view it as an infringement on their sovereignty, arguing that it allows individuals to evade justice for crimes committed in their home countries. This tension often leads to diplomatic disputes between nations, as seen in cases where one country grants asylum to a fugitive wanted by another. The situation becomes even more complicated when the individual seeking asylum has committed serious offenses, such as terrorism or corruption, raising ethical questions about the responsibilities of the host nation.Moreover, the criteria for granting diplomatic asylum are not always clear-cut. While international law provides some guidance, the interpretation of what constitutes 'persecution' can vary widely. In some instances, individuals may be denied asylum because their claims do not meet the stringent requirements set by the host country. This inconsistency can lead to further human rights violations, as vulnerable individuals may be sent back to face persecution.In conclusion, diplomatic asylum represents a critical intersection of international law, human rights, and diplomacy. While it serves as a vital mechanism for protecting individuals from persecution, it also presents challenges that require careful navigation by nations. As global dynamics continue to evolve, the practice of diplomatic asylum will undoubtedly remain a topic of debate, reflecting broader issues of justice, sovereignty, and humanitarian responsibility in an interconnected world.

国家之间的外交关系往往复杂且充满细微差别，这可能导致各种法律和伦理困境。在国际法中，一个最引人入胜的概念是外交庇护，它指的是一个国家对那些在其外交使团内寻求保护以逃避本国迫害的个人所给予的保护。这一做法引发了关于主权、人权以及国家对处于困境中的个人责任的重要问题。外交庇护的概念源于外交使团不可侵犯的理念。当个人进入大使馆或领事馆时，他们在技术上受到东道国的保护，但他们也享有派遣国赋予的某些权利。这种双重性创造了一个独特的情况，即个人在外交场所内可能感到安全，但在引渡或驱逐问题上，他们的法律地位变得有争议。历史上，外交庇护在一些引人注目的案件中被援引。例如，在冷战期间，许多持不同政见者寻求在大使馆避难，以逃避政治压迫。智利外交官奥兰多·莱特利尔（Orlando Letelier）的著名案件凸显了当国家对其视为敌人的个人进行境外行动时所涉及的风险。在这种背景下，外交庇护可以作为面临迫害的个人的生命线，使他们能够逃离压迫政权。然而，授予外交庇护并非没有争议。一些政府将其视为对其主权的侵犯，认为这使个人逃避本国犯下的罪行。此紧张关系常常导致国家之间的外交争端，例如，当一个国家向另一个国家通缉的逃犯授予庇护时。尤其是当寻求庇护的个人犯下严重罪行（如恐怖主义或腐败）时，局势变得更加复杂，这引发了关于东道国责任的伦理问题。此外，授予外交庇护的标准并不总是清晰的。尽管国际法提供了一些指导，但对“迫害”的定义可能因国家而异。在某些情况下，个人可能因其申请未满足东道国设定的严格要求而被拒绝庇护。这种不一致可能导致进一步的人权侵犯，因为脆弱的个人可能被送回面临迫害的地方。总之，外交庇护代表了国际法、人权和外交的关键交汇点。尽管它作为保护个人免受迫害的重要机制，但它也带来了需要各国谨慎处理的挑战。随着全球动态的不断演变，外交庇护的做法无疑将继续成为辩论的话题，反映出在一个相互联系的世界中正义、主权和人道责任的更广泛问题。