lip service

简明释义

空头支票

英英释义

例句

1.He offered lip service to the idea of teamwork, but never collaborates with his colleagues.

他对团队合作的想法只是口头承诺，但从不与同事合作。

2.During the meeting, she paid lip service to employee concerns but didn't implement any changes.

在会议上，她只是对员工的担忧表示了口头承诺，却没有实施任何变更。

3.The charity received lip service support from local businesses, but no financial contributions.

这个慈善机构得到了当地企业的口头承诺支持，但没有任何财务贡献。

4.The company paid lip service to environmental sustainability, but their practices showed otherwise.

这家公司对环境可持续性仅仅是口头承诺，但他们的做法却显示出相反的情况。

5.Many politicians give lip service to education reform without taking real action.

许多政治家仅仅对教育改革表示口头承诺，却没有采取实际行动。

作文

In today's world, where social issues are at the forefront of public discourse, it is not uncommon to hear leaders and organizations express their support for various causes. However, the term lip service often comes to mind when we observe that these expressions of support are not accompanied by meaningful actions. Lip service refers to insincere expression of support or agreement, where words are spoken without any intention of following through with real commitment or action.For instance, consider a company that publicly claims to support environmental sustainability. They may release statements praising green initiatives and promoting their commitment to reducing carbon emissions. However, if their actual practices involve excessive waste production and lack of investment in renewable energy, they are merely paying lip service to the idea of sustainability. This dissonance between words and actions can lead to public skepticism and mistrust.The danger of lip service is that it can undermine genuine efforts made by others who are truly committed to a cause. When organizations or individuals make grand statements but fail to act on them, they dilute the impact of those who are genuinely working towards positive change. For example, non-profit organizations striving to address social justice issues may find their efforts hindered by the empty promises of larger entities that do not take substantial action.Moreover, lip service can create a false sense of progress. People may feel complacent when they hear leaders talk about important issues, believing that change is imminent simply because it has been acknowledged. This can lead to a lack of accountability, as stakeholders may assume that the problem is being addressed when, in reality, it is being ignored. It is crucial for individuals and organizations to move beyond lip service and engage in authentic actions that reflect their stated values.To combat lip service, it is essential for the public to hold leaders accountable. This can be done through advocacy, demanding transparency, and ensuring that promises are kept. Social media has become a powerful tool in this regard, allowing people to call out inconsistencies and push for real change. When the public actively engages with those in power, it can create an environment where lip service is less tolerated, and genuine efforts are recognized and rewarded.In conclusion, while expressing support for important causes is a positive step, it is vital that these expressions are backed by concrete actions. Lip service can lead to disillusionment and hinder real progress. By holding ourselves and others accountable, we can ensure that our words translate into meaningful change. The fight against lip service requires vigilance and commitment, but the results can lead to a more authentic and effective pursuit of the causes we care about most.

在当今这个社会问题处于公共话语前沿的时代，领导者和组织表达对各种事业的支持并不罕见。然而，当我们观察到这些支持的表达并未伴随有意义的行动时，lip service这个词常常浮现在脑海中。lip service指的是对某种观点或协议的不真诚表达，其言辞虽出，但并无真正的承诺或行动。例如，考虑一家公开声称支持环境可持续发展的公司。他们可能会发布声明，赞扬绿色倡议，并宣传他们减少碳排放的承诺。然而，如果他们的实际做法涉及大量废物生产且缺乏对可再生能源的投资，那么他们只是对可持续发展这一理念进行了lip service。这种言行不一的现象可能导致公众的怀疑和不信任。lip service的危险在于，它可能会削弱其他真正致力于某项事业的人的努力。当组织或个人发表宏大的声明却未能付诸行动时，他们稀释了那些真正为积极变化而努力的人的影响力。例如，努力解决社会正义问题的非营利组织可能会发现，他们的努力因大型实体的空头承诺而受到阻碍。此外，lip service可能会造成一种虚假的进步感。当人们听到领导者谈论重要问题时，可能会感到安逸，认为改变即将到来，单因为这些问题得到了承认。这可能导致缺乏问责，因为利益相关者可能会假设问题正在得到解决，而实际上它却被忽视。因此，个人和组织必须超越lip service，参与反映其所宣称价值观的真实行动。为了对抗lip service，公众必须对领导者进行问责。这可以通过倡导、要求透明度以及确保承诺得到履行来实现。社交媒体在这方面已成为一个强大的工具，使人们能够揭露不一致之处，并推动真正的变化。当公众积极与权力者互动时，可以创造一个更少容忍lip service、更多认可和奖励真实努力的环境。总之，尽管对重要事业表达支持是积极的一步，但至关重要的是，这些表达需要有切实行动的支持。lip service可能导致失望，并阻碍真正的进步。通过对自己和他人进行问责，我们可以确保我们的言辞转化为有意义的变化。对抗lip service的斗争需要警惕和承诺，但结果可以导致我们最关心的事业的更真实和有效的追求。