technocrat

简明释义

英[ˈteknəkræt]美[ˈteknəkræt]

n. 技术统治论者；专家政治论者；技术统治

复 数 t e c h n o c r a t s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The euro's future could thus be determined by the actions of two Italians: Mr Berlusconi, the buffoon who may kill it; and Mr Draghi, the technocrat who may be the last man able to save it.

因此，欧元的未来可能被两位意大利人的行动所左右：可能会杀死欧元的小丑贝卢斯科尼，和可能是最后一个有能力拯救欧元的技术官员德拉基。

2.Even in the 1960s, he had a strong public image as an honest, competent law enforcement technocrat.

即使在二十世纪60年代，他的公众形象依然算十分良好，被看作是诚实并且能力卓越的执法技术专家。

3.He asked the technocrat, 'Would you send your wife to such a hospital?

他质问政论家：“你会把你的妻子送到这样的医院吗？”

4.With a degree in civil engineering from Tsinghua, a top university, and over 30 years experience in steel plants, Ms Xie is at heart a technocrat.

谢女士毕业于高等学府清华大学的土木工程专业，以及三十多年从事钢铁产业的经验，她无疑是一位技术统治论者。

5.He did not receive them. A technocrat met them instead.

他没接见他们，而去见了政论家。

6.The euro's future could thus be determined by the actions of two Italians: Mr Berlusconi, the buffoon who may kill it; and Mr Draghi, the technocrat who may be the last man able to save it.

因此，欧元的未来可能被两位意大利人的行动所左右：可能会杀死欧元的小丑贝卢斯科尼，和可能是最后一个有能力拯救欧元的技术官员德拉基。

7.In short, he is a technocrat.

总之，他是一个专业的政客。

8.Mr Makoni, a respected technocrat, has at least a chance.

马科尼先生，这位令人爱戴的技术统治论者，至少还有机会。

9.The CEO appointed a 技术官僚 to lead the company's digital transformation.

首席执行官任命了一位技术官僚来领导公司的数字化转型。

10.Critics argue that 技术官僚 often lack the empathy needed for effective governance.

批评者认为，技术官僚通常缺乏有效治理所需的同理心。

11.In times of crisis, a 技术官僚 can provide clear and rational guidance.

在危机时期，技术官僚可以提供清晰而理性的指导。

12.The new government is filled with experienced 技术官僚 who prioritize data-driven policies.

新政府由经验丰富的技术官僚组成，他们优先考虑以数据为驱动的政策。

13.Many believe that a 技术官僚 approach can solve complex urban issues effectively.

许多人认为，采用技术官僚的方法可以有效解决复杂的城市问题。

作文

In today's rapidly evolving world, the role of a technocrat has become increasingly significant. A technocrat is an individual who is highly skilled in a specific area of technology or science and often applies this expertise to manage and solve complex societal problems. The rise of the technocrat has been fueled by the growing reliance on technology in various sectors, including government, healthcare, and education. As societies face unprecedented challenges, such as climate change, economic inequality, and public health crises, the need for skilled professionals who can navigate these issues with a scientific approach has never been more critical.Historically, the term technocrat emerged in the early 20th century, when engineers and scientists began to advocate for a more rational and efficient approach to governance. They believed that decisions should be based on data and empirical evidence rather than political ideology or populism. This idea gained traction during times of crisis, particularly during the Great Depression, when many turned to experts to guide economic recovery efforts. Today, technocrats are often seen in positions of power, from policymakers to CEOs, where their technical knowledge can directly influence decision-making processes.One of the most notable characteristics of a technocrat is their ability to analyze complex data and derive actionable insights. In an age where information is abundant yet overwhelming, the capacity to sift through vast amounts of data and identify trends is invaluable. For instance, during the COVID-19 pandemic, public health technocrats played a crucial role in shaping responses based on epidemiological data. Their expertise helped governments implement strategies to mitigate the spread of the virus while balancing economic concerns.However, the rise of the technocrat also raises important questions about democracy and accountability. Critics argue that placing too much power in the hands of technical experts can lead to a disconnect between policymakers and the public. While technocrats may possess the skills necessary to address complex issues, they may lack the political acumen to understand the social implications of their decisions. This tension between expertise and democratic values is a topic of ongoing debate.Moreover, the influence of technocrats can sometimes lead to technocracy, a system where decision-making is dominated by technical experts, potentially sidelining the voices of ordinary citizens. As we navigate the complexities of modern governance, it is essential to strike a balance between relying on expert knowledge and ensuring that democratic principles are upheld. Engaging the public in discussions and decision-making processes is vital to maintaining trust and transparency in governance.In conclusion, the role of the technocrat in contemporary society is multifaceted and crucial. As we confront global challenges that require innovative solutions, the expertise of technocrats will undoubtedly play a pivotal role in shaping our future. However, it is equally important to recognize the need for accountability and public engagement in the decision-making process. By fostering a collaborative environment where technical expertise and democratic values coexist, we can harness the potential of technocrats while ensuring that the voices of all citizens are heard and respected.

在当今快速发展的世界中，技术官僚的角色变得越来越重要。技术官僚是指在特定技术或科学领域具有高度专业技能的个人，并通常将这种专业知识应用于管理和解决复杂的社会问题。随着各个行业对技术的依赖不断增加，技术官僚的崛起得到了推动，包括政府、医疗保健和教育等领域。随着社会面临前所未有的挑战，如气候变化、经济不平等和公共卫生危机，对能够以科学方法应对这些问题的专业人士的需求比以往任何时候都更加迫切。历史上，技术官僚一词出现在20世纪初，当时工程师和科学家开始倡导一种更理性和高效的治理方式。他们认为，决策应该基于数据和实证证据，而不是政治意识形态或民粹主义。在危机时期，这一思想得到了广泛支持，特别是在大萧条期间，许多人转向专家以指导经济复苏努力。如今，技术官僚通常被视为权力职位中的人，从政策制定者到首席执行官，他们的技术知识可以直接影响决策过程。技术官僚最显著的特点之一是他们分析复杂数据并得出可操作见解的能力。在信息丰富但又令人不知所措的时代，筛选大量数据并识别趋势的能力是无价的。例如，在COVID-19大流行期间，公共卫生技术官僚在根据流行病学数据塑造应对措施方面发挥了关键作用。他们的专业知识帮助各国政府实施策略，以减缓病毒传播，同时平衡经济问题。然而，技术官僚的崛起也引发了关于民主和问责制的重要问题。批评者认为，将过多权力交给技术专家可能会导致政策制定者与公众之间的脱节。虽然技术官僚可能具备解决复杂问题所需的技能，但他们可能缺乏理解其决策社会影响的政治智慧。这种专业知识与民主价值观之间的紧张关系是一个持续辩论的话题。此外，技术官僚的影响有时会导致技术统治，这是一种由技术专家主导决策的制度，可能会使普通公民的声音被边缘化。在我们应对现代治理的复杂性时，至关重要的是在依赖专家知识与确保民主原则之间取得平衡。让公众参与讨论和决策过程对于维护治理中的信任和透明度至关重要。总之，技术官僚在当代社会中的角色是多方面且至关重要的。随着我们面对需要创新解决方案的全球挑战，技术官僚的专业知识无疑将在塑造我们未来方面发挥关键作用。然而，同样重要的是要认识到在决策过程中对问责制和公众参与的需求。通过营造一个技术专长与民主价值观共存的合作环境，我们可以利用技术官僚的潜力，同时确保所有公民的声音都被倾听和尊重。