pretrial
简明释义
英[ˌpriːˈtraɪəl]美[ˌpriːˈtraɪəl]
n. 事先审理
adj. 审判前的
英英释义
Relating to the period or proceedings before a trial in a court of law. | 与法庭审判前的阶段或程序相关。 |
单词用法
预审会议 | |
预审释放 | |
预审服务 | |
进行预审 | |
提交预审动议 | |
接受预审评估 |
同义词
反义词
审判后 | After the posttrial motions were filed, the judge made a final ruling. | 在提交了审判后的动议后,法官做出了最终裁决。 | |
审判 | The trial lasted for several weeks and concluded with a verdict. | 审判持续了几周,并以裁决结束。 |
例句
1.Pretrial Procedure has a unique value for ensuring Justice and improving efficiency of Civil Procedure.
完善的审前程序对于确保审判公正、提高诉讼效率具有独特的价值。
2.To some extent, specific procedure and system plans in pretrial procedure are designed based on this issue.
从一定意义上讲,刑事审前程序中具体的程序和制度设计都是围绕这个问题展开的。
3.The first part is summary of the pretrial custody system.
第一部分是审前羁押概述。
4.I don't need security clearance for the pretrial?
所以审判前我不需要经过安全检查?
5.The defense USES the pretrial period to its own advantage.
辩护方常利用对其有利的庭审前的阶段。
6.On Sunday, a Japanese court approved a request by prosecutors to extend the captain's pretrial detention for 10 days.
星期天,日本的法院同意了检察官提出的延长十天庭前拘留的请求。
7.The first part tells about what'sthe precise meaning of the pretrial detaining.
第一部分,审前羁押体制的限定及其研究意义。
8.The third part refers the necessity of the pretrial detaining innovation.
第三部分,我国审前羁押体制改革的必要性。
9.The judge scheduled a pretrial hearing to discuss the evidence.
法官安排了一次审前听证会来讨论证据。
10.The attorney filed a motion during the pretrial proceedings.
律师在审前程序中提交了一项动议。
11.They reached a settlement before the pretrial conference.
他们在审前会议之前达成了和解。
12.The pretrial motions were crucial in determining the trial's outcome.
审前动议对决定审判结果至关重要。
13.During the pretrial phase, both parties exchanged documents.
在审前阶段,双方交换了文件。
作文
In the realm of the legal system, the term pretrial refers to the period and procedures that occur before a trial takes place. This phase is crucial as it sets the stage for how the trial will unfold. During the pretrial process, various activities take place, including the gathering of evidence, filing motions, and negotiating settlements. Understanding the significance of the pretrial phase is essential for anyone involved in or studying the law.One of the primary objectives of the pretrial process is to ensure that both parties are adequately prepared for the upcoming trial. This preparation often involves discovery, where both sides exchange information related to the case. For instance, if a plaintiff sues a defendant for breach of contract, the pretrial phase allows both parties to request documents, interrogate witnesses, and gather any other relevant evidence that may support their arguments in court.Additionally, the pretrial phase provides an opportunity for the parties to resolve their disputes without the need for a full trial. Many cases settle during this time, as the costs and uncertainties associated with a trial can be daunting. Mediation and settlement negotiations are common during the pretrial stage, allowing parties to come to an agreement that satisfies both sides, thereby avoiding the lengthy and often stressful trial process.Moreover, the pretrial phase includes various hearings where judges may rule on motions filed by either party. These motions can include requests to dismiss the case, suppress evidence, or compel discovery. The outcomes of these motions can significantly impact the direction of the case, making the pretrial stage a critical component of the judicial process.For defendants, the pretrial phase can be particularly important. It is during this time that they can assess the strength of the prosecution's case against them. By reviewing evidence and witness statements, defendants can make informed decisions about whether to pursue a plea bargain or proceed to trial. This decision-making process is vital, as it can affect the potential consequences they face if found guilty.In conclusion, the pretrial phase is a fundamental aspect of the legal system that serves multiple purposes. It facilitates the preparation of both parties, encourages dispute resolution, and allows for critical rulings that can shape the trial outcome. A thorough understanding of the pretrial process is essential for legal practitioners, defendants, and plaintiffs alike, as it lays the groundwork for the trial and ultimately influences the pursuit of justice. By recognizing the importance of this phase, individuals can better navigate the complexities of the legal system and work towards favorable outcomes in their cases.
在法律体系中,术语pretrial指的是审判之前发生的时间和程序。这个阶段至关重要,因为它为审判的展开奠定了基础。在pretrial过程中,各种活动会发生,包括证据的收集、动议的提交和和解的谈判。理解pretrial阶段的重要性对于任何参与或研究法律的人来说都是必不可少的。pretrial过程的主要目标之一是确保双方为即将到来的审判做好充分准备。这种准备通常涉及发现程序,在此过程中双方交换与案件相关的信息。例如,如果原告起诉被告违反合同,pretrial阶段允许双方请求文件、讯问证人以及收集任何其他可能支持他们在法庭上论点的相关证据。此外,pretrial阶段为当事方提供了在无需进行完整审判的情况下解决争端的机会。许多案件在此期间达成和解,因为与审判相关的费用和不确定性可能令人望而生畏。调解和和解谈判在pretrial阶段是常见的,允许双方达成满意的协议,从而避免漫长且通常压力重重的审判过程。此外,pretrial阶段包括各种听证会,法官可能会对任一方提交的动议作出裁决。这些动议可以包括请求驳回案件、禁止证据或强制发现的请求。这些动议的结果可能会显著影响案件的方向,使得pretrial阶段成为司法过程的关键组成部分。对于被告而言,pretrial阶段尤其重要。在此期间,他们可以评估控方针对他们的案件的强度。通过审查证据和证人陈述,被告可以做出明智的决定,选择是追求认罪协议还是继续进行审判。这个决策过程至关重要,因为它可能会影响如果被判有罪所面临的潜在后果。总之,pretrial阶段是法律系统的一个基本方面,具有多重目的。它促进了双方的准备,鼓励争端解决,并允许进行关键裁决,这些裁决可以影响审判结果。全面理解pretrial过程对于法律从业者、被告和原告来说都是必不可少的,因为它为审判奠定了基础,并最终影响了对正义的追求。通过认识到这一阶段的重要性,个人可以更好地驾驭法律体系的复杂性,并努力在其案件中获得有利结果。