surreptitious

简明释义

英[ˌsʌrəpˈtɪʃəs]美[ˌsɜːrəpˈtɪʃəs]

adj. 秘密的；鬼鬼祟祟的；暗中的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Those people hyenas birds and insects are painted with black oil paint pigment with a large amount of acrylic added and the effect is very surreptitious as long as I maintain the shape.

那些人、鬣狗、鸟儿、虫子则用黑色的油画颜料加大量的丙烯剂画上去，效果很是随意，只要保持外形就行了。

2.To see how they were feeling in the moment, participants were given surreptitious measures both before and after writing these short descriptions.

为了观察被试当时的真实感受，研究者已经在他们写这些简短描述之前和之后秘密地对他们进行了测量。

3.This "couture" outfit from the Office of Technical Readiness allowed spies to munch on canapes and dance a waltz while still snapping surreptitious pics and recording cocktail chatter.

这款由中情局技术储备办公室开发的“时装系列”间谍设备让特工们在开怀畅饮声色犬马之时，依然能够拍照录音。

4.It is similar with the crime of making a false capital contribution and surreptitious withdrawing the contributed capital.

虚报注册资本罪与虚假出资罪、抽逃出资罪尽管有一定的相似之处，但其区别又是十分明显的。

5.Underneath lies what passes for commerce the surreptitious journey of goods that help keep the territory running.

而在地底下则暗藏着商业通道这种偷偷摸摸运送过来的货物帮助维持这个地区的日常运转。

6.His surreptitious behaviour naturally aroused suspicion.

他那鬼鬼祟祟的行为自然引起了旁人的怀疑。

7.Those people hyenas birds and insects are painted with black oil paint pigment with a large amount of acrylic added and the effect is very surreptitious as long as I maintain the shape.

那些人、鬣狗、鸟儿、虫子则用黑色的油画颜料加大量的丙烯剂画上去，效果很是随意，只要保持外形就行了。

8.They planned a surreptitious 秘密的 meeting to discuss their strategy.

他们计划了一次秘密会议来讨论他们的策略。

9.His surreptitious 秘密的 actions eventually caught up with him.

他的秘密行为最终被揭穿了。

10.He made a surreptitious 秘密的 glance at his phone during the meeting.

他在会议期间偷偷地看了手机。

11.She had a surreptitious 秘密的 relationship with her coworker.

她和同事有一段秘密的关系。

12.The surreptitious 秘密的 recording of the conversation was illegal.

对话的秘密录音是非法的。

作文

In today's world, where privacy is increasingly becoming a luxury, the concept of surreptitious actions has gained significant attention. People often engage in surreptitious behaviors to protect their personal lives or to achieve their goals without drawing unwanted attention. This essay explores the implications of surreptitious actions in various contexts, including social interactions, technology, and governance.Firstly, in social interactions, individuals may resort to surreptitious methods to navigate complex relationships. For instance, someone might check their partner’s phone messages without consent, driven by jealousy or insecurity. While the intention might be to safeguard the relationship, such surreptitious behavior often leads to mistrust and conflict. It raises ethical questions about the boundaries of privacy and respect in personal relationships. Trust is fundamental in any partnership, and when one party engages in surreptitious activities, it can undermine that trust, leading to long-term consequences.Moreover, the rise of technology has amplified surreptitious behaviors. With the advent of surveillance tools and social media, people can easily monitor each other’s activities without their knowledge. For example, employers might use surreptitious surveillance methods to track employee productivity, which raises concerns about workplace privacy. While some argue that monitoring is necessary for efficiency, others believe it creates a toxic work environment where employees feel constantly watched. The balance between ensuring productivity and respecting individual privacy is a delicate one, and surreptitious practices can complicate this dynamic.In the realm of governance, surreptitious actions can have profound implications for society. Governments may engage in surreptitious surveillance of citizens under the guise of national security. While the intention might be to protect the public, such actions can lead to a slippery slope of eroding civil liberties. Citizens may feel they are constantly monitored, leading to self-censorship and a chilling effect on free speech. The ethical dilemma here revolves around the justification of surreptitious actions in the name of safety versus the right to privacy and freedom.Furthermore, the media plays a significant role in shaping perceptions of surreptitious behavior. Investigative journalism often involves surreptitious tactics to uncover corruption or malpractice. While such actions can serve the public interest, they also raise questions about the ethics of obtaining information without consent. For instance, undercover journalists may infiltrate organizations to expose wrongdoing, but the methods used can be controversial. The line between ethical reporting and surreptitious invasion of privacy is often blurred, leading to debates about the responsibilities of the press.In conclusion, surreptitious actions permeate various aspects of our lives, from personal relationships to governance and media. While there may be valid reasons for engaging in surreptitious behavior, it is essential to consider the ethical implications and potential consequences. Striking a balance between privacy and transparency is crucial in fostering trust and integrity in all areas of life. As we navigate an increasingly complex world, understanding the nuances of surreptitious actions will help us make informed decisions about our behaviors and the systems we engage with.

在当今世界，隐私越来越成为一种奢侈品，surreptitious（秘密的，偷偷的）行为的概念引起了人们的广泛关注。人们常常采取surreptitious的方式来保护个人生活，或在不引起不必要注意的情况下实现目标。本文探讨了surreptitious行为在社交互动、技术和治理等不同背景下的影响。首先，在社交互动中，个人可能会采取surreptitious的方法来应对复杂的人际关系。例如，有人可能会在未征得同意的情况下查看伴侣的手机信息，这种行为往往源于嫉妒或不安全感。虽然这种行为的初衷可能是为了保护关系，但这种surreptitious的行为往往会导致不信任和冲突。它提出了关于隐私和尊重在个人关系中的界限的伦理问题。信任是任何伴侣关系的基础，当一方参与surreptitious活动时，可能会破坏这种信任，从而导致长期后果。此外，科技的崛起放大了surreptitious行为的影响。随着监控工具和社交媒体的出现，人们可以轻易地在不知情的情况下监视彼此的活动。例如，雇主可能会使用surreptitious监控方法来跟踪员工的生产力，这引发了对工作场所隐私的担忧。虽然有人认为监控对于提高效率是必要的，但其他人认为这会造成一种有毒的工作环境，让员工感到被不断监视。在确保生产力和尊重个人隐私之间找到平衡是一项微妙的任务，而surreptitious的做法可能会使这一动态复杂化。在治理领域，surreptitious行为可能对社会产生深远的影响。政府可能会以国家安全为名，进行surreptitious监视公民。虽然其意图可能是保护公众，但这种做法可能导致公民自由的侵蚀。公民可能会觉得自己被持续监视，导致自我审查和对言论自由的寒蝉效应。这里的伦理困境围绕着在安全名义下surreptitious行为的正当性与隐私和自由权利之间的权衡。此外，媒体在塑造对surreptitious行为的看法方面发挥着重要作用。调查性新闻报道通常涉及surreptitious策略，以揭露腐败或不当行为。虽然这些行为可能符合公众利益，但也引发了关于在未征得同意的情况下获取信息的伦理问题。例如，卧底记者可能会渗透到组织中以揭露不当行为，但所采用的方法可能引发争议。伦理报道与surreptitious侵犯隐私之间的界限往往模糊不清，导致关于媒体责任的辩论。总之，surreptitious行为渗透到我们生活的各个方面，从个人关系到治理和媒体。虽然参与surreptitious行为可能有合理的理由，但考虑伦理影响和潜在后果至关重要。在所有生活领域中，在隐私和透明度之间找到平衡对于促进信任和诚信至关重要。随着我们在日益复杂的世界中导航，理解surreptitious行为的细微差别将帮助我们对自己的行为和所参与的系统做出明智的决策。