asset stripper

简明释义

拆骨专家

英英释义

例句

1.The recent acquisition by the asset stripper raised alarms among employees about potential layoffs.

最近被资产剥离者收购引发了员工对潜在裁员的警报。

2.The company was taken over by an asset stripper, which led to the sale of its valuable properties.

这家公司被一个资产剥离者收购，导致其有价值的资产被出售。

3.An asset stripper often focuses on selling off parts of a company rather than improving its overall performance.

一个资产剥离者通常专注于出售公司的部分资产，而不是改善其整体表现。

4.Investors were concerned that the new management team would act like an asset stripper and dismantle the business for profit.

投资者担心新管理团队会像一个资产剥离者一样，为了利润拆解业务。

5.In the eyes of many, the CEO was nothing more than an asset stripper who cared only about short-term gains.

在许多人看来，这位首席执行官只是一个资产剥离者，只关心短期利益。

作文

In the world of finance and business, various terms are used to describe different practices and strategies. One such term that often carries a negative connotation is asset stripper. An asset stripper refers to an individual or company that acquires another company primarily to sell off its assets for profit, rather than to operate the business as a going concern. This practice can lead to significant job losses and can harm the overall economy, as the stripped assets may include valuable resources, intellectual property, and even real estate. The process typically begins when an asset stripper identifies a target company that is undervalued or struggling financially. The asset stripper believes that the company's assets are worth more than its current market valuation. Once the acquisition is made, the asset stripper will often look to sell off parts of the company, such as equipment, buildings, or brand names, to maximize their return on investment. This strategy can be particularly appealing in industries where companies have accumulated substantial physical assets over time.However, the implications of being an asset stripper extend beyond mere financial gain. The act of stripping a company of its assets can have devastating effects on employees and communities. When a company is sold off piece by piece, it often results in layoffs, as the new owner may not need the entire workforce to manage the remaining assets. Additionally, local economies can suffer when businesses close down, leading to reduced consumer spending and increased unemployment rates.Critics of asset strippers argue that this practice prioritizes short-term profits over long-term sustainability. While it may benefit shareholders in the short run, it often leaves a trail of destruction in its wake. Employees lose their jobs, suppliers lose contracts, and communities lose vital economic contributors. Furthermore, the long-term consequences can include a diminished reputation for the industry as a whole, making it harder for legitimate businesses to thrive.Despite the negative aspects of being an asset stripper, some argue that this practice can serve a purpose in the market. For example, if a company is failing and unable to recover, selling off its assets might allow for a more efficient allocation of resources. In some cases, the assets acquired by the asset stripper can be repurposed or revitalized in other ventures, potentially leading to new job creation elsewhere.In conclusion, while the term asset stripper may evoke images of corporate raiders and ruthless financiers, it is essential to understand the broader context of this practice. It involves complex decisions that affect not only the companies involved but also their employees and surrounding communities. As we continue to navigate the intricacies of modern economics, it is crucial to consider the ethical implications of our business practices and strive for a balance between profitability and social responsibility.

在金融和商业的世界中，使用各种术语来描述不同的实践和策略。其中一个经常带有负面含义的术语是资产剥离者。资产剥离者指的是一个个人或公司，主要通过收购另一家公司来出售其资产以获取利润，而不是将其作为持续经营的业务。这种做法可能导致大量失业，并可能对整体经济造成伤害，因为被剥离的资产可能包括有价值的资源、知识产权甚至房地产。这一过程通常始于资产剥离者识别出一个被低估或财务状况不佳的目标公司。资产剥离者认为，该公司的资产价值超过其当前的市场估值。一旦收购完成，资产剥离者通常会考虑出售公司的部分资产，例如设备、建筑物或品牌名称，以最大化其投资回报。这一策略在那些公司积累了大量实物资产的行业中特别吸引人。然而，作为资产剥离者的影响超出了单纯的财务收益。剥离公司资产的行为可能对员工和社区产生毁灭性的影响。当一家公司被一块一块地出售时，通常会导致裁员，因为新所有者可能不需要整个劳动力来管理剩余的资产。此外，当企业关闭时，当地经济可能会受到影响，导致消费者支出减少和失业率上升。资产剥离者的批评者认为，这种做法优先考虑短期利润而非长期可持续性。虽然这可能在短期内使股东受益，但它往往会留下破坏的痕迹。员工失去工作，供应商失去合同，社区失去重要的经济贡献者。此外，长期后果可能包括整个行业的声誉下降，使合法企业更难以生存。尽管作为资产剥离者的负面方面存在，一些人认为这种做法在市场中可以发挥作用。例如，如果一家公司失败并无法恢复，出售其资产可能允许资源的更有效分配。在某些情况下，资产剥离者收购的资产可以在其他企业中重新利用或复兴，潜在地导致其他地方的新工作创造。总之，虽然资产剥离者这个术语可能唤起企业掠夺者和无情金融家的形象，但理解这一实践的更广泛背景至关重要。它涉及复杂的决策，不仅影响相关公司，还影响其员工和周围社区。在我们继续驾驭现代经济的复杂性时，考虑商业实践的伦理影响并努力在盈利与社会责任之间取得平衡是至关重要的。