agency by estoppel

简明释义

表见代理

英英释义

例句

1.The client assumed that the consultant had the authority to make decisions, resulting in an agency by estoppel when the consultant acted.

客户假设顾问有权做出决定，导致顾问采取行动时产生了代理推定。

2.The court ruled that there was an agency by estoppel because the principal had allowed the agent to act on their behalf without proper authority.

法院裁定存在代理推定，因为委托人允许代理人在没有适当授权的情况下代表他们行事。

3.Due to the principal's silence and inaction, the third party believed there was an agency by estoppel and entered into a contract with the agent.

由于委托人的沉默和不作为，第三方相信存在代理推定，并与代理人签订了合同。

4.In a case involving real estate, the seller's actions created an agency by estoppel, leading the buyer to believe the agent was authorized to negotiate.

在一起涉及房地产的案件中，卖方的行为造成了代理推定，使买方相信代理人有权进行谈判。

5.When the company allowed its employee to represent it in negotiations, it established an agency by estoppel that bound the company to the agreement.

当公司允许其员工代表公司进行谈判时，它建立了一个代理推定，使公司对协议承担责任。

作文

In the realm of contract law, the concept of agency by estoppel plays a significant role in determining the rights and responsibilities of parties involved in a transaction. It arises when one party creates an impression that another party has the authority to act on their behalf, and as a result, a third party relies on this assumption. This legal doctrine prevents a principal from denying the existence of an agency relationship when they have led a third party to believe in its existence. Essentially, agency by estoppel serves to protect the interests of those who have relied on the representations made by the principal. To better understand agency by estoppel, let's consider a practical example. Imagine a scenario where a company, ABC Corp, allows one of its employees, John, to represent the company in negotiations with potential clients. Although John does not have formal authority to finalize deals, he frequently acts as if he does, and ABC Corp is aware of this behavior but does nothing to correct it. If a client, believing John has the authority, enters into a contract with him, ABC Corp may be bound by that contract under the principle of agency by estoppel. This situation illustrates how the conduct of the principal can create an agency relationship, even when no formal agreement exists.The implications of agency by estoppel are profound, especially in business transactions. It emphasizes the importance of clear communication and representation in any professional setting. Companies must ensure that their employees and agents do not misrepresent their authority, as this could lead to unintended contractual obligations. Conversely, third parties must exercise due diligence when entering into agreements, ensuring that they verify the authority of individuals claiming to act on behalf of another entity. Moreover, agency by estoppel highlights the balance between protecting the interests of third parties and holding principals accountable for their actions or inactions. It serves as a reminder that parties cannot simply deny responsibility for their representations, especially when others have relied on them. In essence, this legal doctrine fosters trust and reliability in commercial relationships, encouraging parties to act in good faith. In conclusion, agency by estoppel is a crucial concept in contract law that safeguards the interests of third parties who rely on the representations made by a principal. It underscores the importance of clarity in agency relationships and the need for principals to manage their representatives' actions carefully. Understanding this principle can help businesses navigate legal complexities and foster more trustworthy relationships with clients and partners. As the business landscape continues to evolve, the relevance of agency by estoppel remains significant, reminding all parties of the importance of ethical conduct and clear communication in their dealings.

代理禁止反言在合同法领域中扮演着重要角色，决定了参与交易的各方的权利与责任。当一方创造出另一方有权代表他们行事的印象时，且因此导致第三方依赖这一假设时，就会产生这一概念。这一法律原则阻止委托人否认代理关系的存在，尤其是在他们曾让第三方相信这种关系存在的情况下。基本上，代理禁止反言旨在保护那些依赖委托人所作陈述的利益。为了更好地理解代理禁止反言，我们可以考虑一个实际例子。想象这样一个场景：一家名为ABC公司的公司允许其员工约翰在与潜在客户的谈判中代表公司。尽管约翰没有正式的权力来最终确定交易，但他经常表现得好像他有这样的权力，而ABC公司对此行为知情却没有采取任何纠正措施。如果一位客户相信约翰有权力并与他签订合同，那么根据代理禁止反言的原则，ABC公司可能会受到该合同的约束。这种情况说明了委托人的行为如何在没有正式协议的情况下创建代理关系。代理禁止反言的影响深远，特别是在商业交易中。它强调了在任何专业环境中清晰沟通和表述的重要性。公司必须确保其员工和代理人不会误表述他们的权威，因为这可能导致意想不到的合同义务。相反，第三方在签订协议时必须尽职调查，确保他们验证声称代表另一个实体的个人的权威。此外，代理禁止反言突显了保护第三方利益和追究委托人因其行为或不作为而承担责任之间的平衡。它提醒各方，不能简单地否认其陈述的责任，尤其是在其他人依赖这些陈述的情况下。本质上，这一法律原则促进了商业关系中的信任和可靠性，鼓励各方诚信行事。总之，代理禁止反言是合同法中的一个关键概念，保护了依赖委托人陈述的第三方的利益。它强调了代理关系中清晰度的重要性，以及委托人对其代表行为的管理需求。理解这一原则可以帮助企业应对法律复杂性，并与客户和合作伙伴建立更值得信赖的关系。随着商业环境的不断发展，代理禁止反言的相关性仍然显著，提醒所有各方在交易中遵循道德行为和清晰沟通的重要性。