administrative interference

简明释义

行政干预

英英释义

例句

1.The team's success was partly due to the lack of administrative interference during their project.

团队的成功部分归功于项目期间缺乏行政干预。

2.Many employees complained about the administrative interference that hindered their productivity.

许多员工抱怨行政干预妨碍了他们的工作效率。

3.The project was delayed because of administrative interference from higher management.

由于高层管理的行政干预，项目被延迟。

4.To improve efficiency, the organization aimed to reduce administrative interference in decision-making processes.

为了提高效率，组织旨在减少决策过程中的行政干预。

5.The company faced significant challenges due to administrative interference in its operations.

由于行政干预，公司在运营中面临重大挑战。

作文

In modern governance, the concept of administrative interference plays a crucial role in shaping the relationship between governmental bodies and the public. 行政干预 refers to actions taken by government officials or agencies that impact the operations and decisions of other entities, including businesses, non-profits, and even individual citizens. Understanding the implications of administrative interference is essential for both policymakers and the general public, as it can significantly affect economic stability, social equity, and individual freedoms.One of the primary areas where administrative interference is observed is in the regulation of businesses. Governments often implement rules and regulations aimed at ensuring fair competition, protecting consumers, and safeguarding the environment. While these regulations are necessary for maintaining order and accountability, excessive or poorly designed administrative interference can stifle innovation and create barriers to entry for new businesses. For instance, overly stringent licensing requirements may discourage entrepreneurs from starting new ventures, ultimately hindering economic growth.Moreover, administrative interference can manifest in various forms, such as bureaucratic red tape, which complicates processes and prolongs decision-making. This can lead to frustration among citizens and businesses alike, as they navigate through a labyrinth of procedures to obtain necessary permits or approvals. In some cases, administrative interference may even lead to corruption, where officials exploit their power for personal gain, further eroding public trust in governmental institutions.On the other hand, there are instances where administrative interference is necessary and beneficial. For example, during a public health crisis, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, governments may need to impose restrictions on public gatherings and mandate mask-wearing to protect the health and safety of their citizens. In these situations, 行政干预 serves a vital purpose in safeguarding public welfare, demonstrating that not all forms of interference are detrimental.Furthermore, the balance between necessary administrative interference and excessive control is delicate. Policymakers must carefully consider the potential consequences of their actions, striving to create regulations that promote the common good without infringing on individual rights. This requires a thorough understanding of the needs and challenges faced by various stakeholders, including business owners, employees, and the broader community.In conclusion, administrative interference is a multifaceted concept that can have both positive and negative implications. While it is essential for maintaining order and protecting public interests, excessive or poorly implemented interference can hinder progress and undermine trust in government. As society continues to evolve, it is imperative for policymakers to strike a balance that fosters innovation and economic growth while ensuring the welfare of the public. By doing so, they can navigate the complexities of administrative interference and contribute to a more equitable and prosperous society.

在现代治理中，行政干预的概念在塑造政府机构与公众之间的关系方面发挥着至关重要的作用。行政干预是指政府官员或机构采取的影响其他实体（包括企业、非营利组织甚至个人公民）操作和决策的行为。理解行政干预的含义对政策制定者和公众来说至关重要，因为它会显著影响经济稳定、社会公平和个人自由。行政干预主要体现在商业监管领域。政府通常实施旨在确保公平竞争、保护消费者和维护环境的规则和法规。虽然这些法规对于维护秩序和问责制是必要的，但过度或设计不当的行政干预可能会扼杀创新，并为新企业设立障碍。例如，过于严格的许可要求可能会阻止企业家创办新企业，从而最终妨碍经济增长。此外，行政干预可以以各种形式表现出来，例如官僚主义的繁文缛节，这使得流程复杂并延长决策时间。这可能导致公民和企业感到沮丧，因为他们在获得必要的许可证或批准时需要穿越一系列程序。在某些情况下，行政干预甚至可能导致腐败，官员利用其权力谋取个人利益，从而进一步侵蚀公众对政府机构的信任。另一方面，有些情况下，行政干预是必要且有益的。例如，在公共卫生危机期间，如COVID-19大流行，政府可能需要对公众聚集施加限制，并强制要求佩戴口罩，以保护公民的健康和安全。在这些情况下，行政干预在保障公共福利方面发挥了重要作用，表明并非所有形式的干预都是有害的。此外，必要的行政干预与过度控制之间的平衡是微妙的。政策制定者必须仔细考虑其行动的潜在后果，努力制定促进公共利益而不侵犯个人权利的法规。这需要深入了解各利益相关者面临的需求和挑战，包括企业主、员工和更广泛的社区。总之，行政干预是一个多方面的概念，可能具有积极和消极的影响。虽然它对维持秩序和保护公共利益至关重要，但过度或实施不当的干预可能会阻碍进步并削弱公众对政府的信任。随着社会的不断发展，政策制定者必须努力实现促进创新和经济增长的平衡，同时确保公众的福利。通过这样做，他们可以驾驭行政干预的复杂性，为建立一个更加公平和繁荣的社会作出贡献。