across-the-board tariff reduction

简明释义

全面降低关税

英英释义

例句

1.The government announced an across-the-board tariff reduction to boost trade with other countries.

政府宣布实施全面的关税削减以促进与其他国家的贸易。

2.Businesses are hopeful that the across-the-board tariff reduction will enhance their competitiveness.

企业对全面的关税削减能增强他们的竞争力充满希望。

3.Many economists believe that an across-the-board tariff reduction could lower prices for consumers.

许多经济学家认为，全面的关税削减可以降低消费者的价格。

4.During the trade negotiations, a key point was the across-the-board tariff reduction proposed by both sides.

在贸易谈判中，一个关键点是双方提议的全面的关税削减。

5.The recent across-the-board tariff reduction has led to an increase in imports.

最近的全面的关税削减导致进口量增加。

作文

In recent years, the global economy has faced numerous challenges, from trade wars to economic downturns. One strategy that has been proposed to alleviate some of these issues is an across-the-board tariff reduction. This term refers to a comprehensive decrease in tariffs imposed on goods and services by a government, affecting all sectors equally. The idea behind such a policy is to stimulate economic growth, enhance international trade, and ultimately benefit consumers with lower prices. An across-the-board tariff reduction can be particularly beneficial in a world where countries are increasingly interdependent. By lowering tariffs, nations can encourage imports, allowing consumers access to a wider variety of goods at more competitive prices. For example, if a country reduces tariffs on electronics, consumers may find it easier to purchase the latest technology without facing exorbitant costs. Additionally, businesses that rely on imported materials can reduce their production costs, leading to lower prices for their own products. Moreover, such a reduction can foster better diplomatic relations between countries. When nations engage in trade negotiations, a willingness to implement an across-the-board tariff reduction can serve as a gesture of goodwill. It signals a commitment to open markets and mutual economic benefit. Countries that adopt this approach may find themselves in a stronger position during trade discussions, as they demonstrate a readiness to collaborate rather than protect domestic industries at the expense of international partnerships. However, it is essential to consider the potential downsides of an across-the-board tariff reduction. While it can lead to lower prices for consumers, it may also pose challenges for domestic industries that compete with foreign imports. Local manufacturers could struggle to keep up with the influx of cheaper goods, potentially leading to job losses and factory closures. Therefore, while the immediate effects of such a policy may seem beneficial, the long-term implications require careful consideration and planning. Another point to consider is the impact on government revenue. Tariffs are a significant source of income for many governments, and reducing them across the board could lead to budget shortfalls. Policymakers must weigh the benefits of increased consumer spending against the potential loss of revenue that could fund essential services and infrastructure projects. A balanced approach may involve targeting specific industries for tariff reductions while maintaining protections for others that are vital to the national economy. In conclusion, an across-the-board tariff reduction presents both opportunities and challenges. It can enhance consumer choice, lower prices, and promote international cooperation. However, it also poses risks to domestic industries and government revenue. As policymakers consider implementing such a measure, it is crucial to conduct thorough analyses and engage stakeholders from various sectors to ensure that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. Ultimately, the goal should be to create a fair and equitable economic environment that fosters growth for all parties involved.

近年来，全球经济面临诸多挑战，从贸易战到经济衰退。一个被提出来的缓解这些问题的策略是全面降低关税。这个术语指的是政府对商品和服务所征收的关税进行全面减少，影响所有行业。这样的政策背后的想法是刺激经济增长，增强国际贸易，并最终使消费者受益于更低的价格。全面降低关税在一个国家间日益相互依赖的世界中尤为有利。通过降低关税，各国可以鼓励进口，让消费者以更具竞争力的价格获得更广泛的商品。例如，如果一个国家降低电子产品的关税，消费者可能会发现购买最新技术变得更加容易，而无需面对高昂的成本。此外，依赖进口材料的企业可以降低生产成本，从而使自己的产品价格更低。此外，这样的降低可以促进国家之间更好的外交关系。当各国进行贸易谈判时，愿意实施全面降低关税可以作为一种善意的表示。这表明对开放市场和共同经济利益的承诺。采取这种方法的国家可能会在贸易讨论中处于更强的位置，因为他们展示了合作的意愿，而不是以牺牲国际伙伴关系为代价来保护国内产业。然而，考虑全面降低关税的潜在缺点也是至关重要的。虽然这可能导致消费者价格降低，但也可能对与外国进口竞争的国内产业带来挑战。当地制造商可能难以应对便宜商品的涌入，可能导致失业和工厂关闭。因此，尽管这种政策的短期效果似乎是有利的，但长期影响需要仔细考虑和规划。另一个需要考虑的点是对政府收入的影响。关税是许多政府的重要收入来源，全面降低关税可能导致预算赤字。政策制定者必须权衡消费者支出增加的好处与可能失去的收入，这些收入本可以用于资助基本服务和基础设施项目。平衡的方法可能涉及针对特定行业的关税减少，同时保持对对国家经济至关重要的其他行业的保护。总之，全面降低关税既带来了机遇，也带来了挑战。它可以增强消费者选择、降低价格并促进国际合作。然而，它也对国内产业和政府收入构成风险。当政策制定者考虑实施这样的措施时，进行全面分析并与各个行业的利益相关者进行沟通至关重要，以确保收益大于缺陷。最终，目标应该是创造一个公平和公正的经济环境，促进所有参与方的增长。