necessarian

简明释义

英[/nəˈsɛsəriən/]美[/nəˈsɛsəriən/]

adj. 必然论的（等于 necessitarian）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Fristly, this article introduces the developed background and key technology, educes the importance and necessarian of this article.

本文首先介绍了采砂船监测系统的开发背景以及相关技术，得出研究本课题的重要性和必要性。

2.Fristly, this article introduces the developed background and key technology, educes the importance and necessarian of this article.

本文首先介绍了采砂船监测系统的开发背景以及相关技术，得出研究本课题的重要性和必要性。

3.A necessarian 必然论者 believes that human actions are predetermined by genetics and environment.

一个必然论者 necessarian 认为人类的行为是由基因和环境预先决定的。

4.The necessarian 必然论者 perspective challenges the concept of free will.

这种必然论者 necessarian 的观点挑战了自由意志的概念。

5.In philosophical discussions, a necessarian 必然论者 argues that all events are determined by preceding causes.

在哲学讨论中，必然论者 necessarian 认为所有事件都是由先前的原因决定的。

6.Many scientists adopt a necessarian 必然论者 view when explaining natural phenomena.

许多科学家在解释自然现象时采用必然论者 necessarian 的观点。

7.In literature, a character who embodies necessarian 必然论者 beliefs often faces moral dilemmas.

在文学中，一个体现必然论者 necessarian 信念的角色通常会面临道德困境。

作文

In the realm of philosophy, the term necessarian refers to a belief system that emphasizes the necessity of events and actions in the universe. This perspective posits that everything that happens is a result of preceding conditions and causes, leaving little room for randomness or free will. The necessarian viewpoint challenges the notion of human agency, suggesting that our choices are predetermined by factors beyond our control. To explore the implications of being a necessarian, we must consider how this philosophy interacts with concepts like morality and responsibility. If all actions are necessitated by prior events, can individuals truly be held accountable for their decisions? This question has significant ramifications in various fields, including law, ethics, and psychology. For instance, in a legal context, if a crime is viewed through a necessarian lens, one might argue that the perpetrator had no choice but to commit the act due to their circumstances. This perspective could lead to more lenient sentences or even a reevaluation of guilt altogether.Moreover, the necessarian perspective raises questions about the nature of existence itself. Are we merely puppets dancing on the strings of fate, or do we possess some form of autonomy? Philosophers such as Baruch Spinoza and David Hume have contributed to this debate, each providing different interpretations of necessity and freedom. Spinoza, for example, argued that understanding the necessity behind our actions can lead to greater personal freedom, while Hume suggested that our perception of free will is an illusion crafted by our experiences and societal norms.In everyday life, many people unknowingly adopt necessarian beliefs when they rationalize their experiences. For instance, someone might say, "I had to take that job because I needed the money," implying that their choice was not truly a choice at all but rather a necessity dictated by their situation. This mindset can be comforting, as it absolves individuals from the burden of making difficult decisions. However, it can also lead to a sense of fatalism, where people feel powerless to change their circumstances.On the other hand, rejecting the necessarian viewpoint can empower individuals to take control of their lives. By embracing the idea that we have the ability to shape our destinies, we can cultivate a proactive approach to challenges and opportunities. This empowerment fosters resilience and encourages individuals to strive for betterment, rather than resigning themselves to the belief that their paths are already laid out.In conclusion, the concept of necessarian philosophy invites us to reflect on the nature of our choices and the extent of our freedom. While it provides a framework for understanding the interconnectedness of events, it also poses challenging questions about accountability and agency. Ultimately, whether one subscribes to a necessarian worldview or not, engaging with these ideas can lead to deeper insights into our lives and the forces that shape them.

在哲学领域，术语necessarian指的是一种强调宇宙中事件和行为必然性的信仰体系。这种观点认为，发生的一切都是前因后果的结果，几乎没有随机性或自由意志的余地。necessarian的观点挑战了人类行为的概念，暗示我们的选择是由超出我们控制的因素所决定的。要探讨作为一个necessarian的含义，我们必须考虑这一哲学如何与道德和责任等概念相互作用。如果所有的行为都是由先前的事件所必然导致的，那么个人是否真的可以对他们的决定负责？这个问题在法律、伦理和心理学等多个领域都有重要的影响。例如，在法律背景下，如果通过necessarian的视角来看待犯罪，人们可能会争辩说，罪犯由于其环境而别无选择，只能实施该行为。这种观点可能导致更宽松的判刑，甚至重新评估罪责。此外，necessarian的观点还引发了关于存在本质的问题。我们是命运之线上的木偶，还是拥有某种形式的自主权？哲学家如巴鲁赫·斯宾诺莎和大卫·休谟为这一辩论作出了贡献，各自提供了对必然性和自由的不同解释。例如，斯宾诺莎认为，理解我们行为背后的必然性可以带来更大的个人自由，而休谟则认为，我们对自由意志的感知是由我们的经历和社会规范构建的幻觉。在日常生活中，许多人在不知不觉中采用necessarian的信念，当他们合理化自己的经历时。例如，有人可能会说：“我不得不接受那份工作，因为我需要钱”，这暗示着他们的选择根本不是选择，而是由他们的处境决定的必然性。这种心态可能令人感到安慰，因为它免除了个人做出艰难决定的负担。然而，它也可能导致宿命论的感觉，人们感到无力改变自己的处境。另一方面，拒绝necessarian的观点可以赋予个人掌控自己生活的能力。通过接受我们有能力塑造自己命运的想法，我们可以培养一种积极主动应对挑战和机遇的方法。这种赋权促进了韧性，并鼓励个人努力追求更好的生活，而不是屈从于自己的道路已经注定的信念。总之，necessarian哲学的概念邀请我们反思选择的本质和自由的程度。虽然它提供了一个理解事件相互关联性的框架，但它也提出了关于责任和代理权的挑战性问题。最终，无论一个人是否认同necessarian的世界观，参与这些思想的讨论都能带来对我们生活及其塑造力量的更深刻见解。