devolve

简明释义

英[dɪˈvɒlv]美[dɪˈvɑːlv]

vi. 被移交；转让

vt. 转移；移交；使滚下；退化；衰落

第 三 人 称 单 数 d e v o l v e s

现 在 分 词 d e v o l v i n g

过 去 式 d e v o l v e d

过 去 分 词 d e v o l v e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The best companies are those that devolve responsibility as far as they can.

最好的公司是那些尽可能把责任下放的公司。

2.And, despite occasional attempts to devolve power in line with Mr Cameron's "Big Society", the state will still fundamentally be the same shape, trying to do virtually all the same things.

并且，尽管为与卡梅伦先生“大社会”理念保持一致偶尔下放了一些权利，国家在根本上还是保持原来的形态，做着几乎同样的事。

3.We devolve your company as a single agent in China.

我们将委托贵公司作为我公司在中国的独家业务代理。

4.But if people tire of it and cede control to special interests that do not align with the public interest, Peer to Patent could devolve into just another prop for the status quo.

但如果人们厌倦了它，放弃去控制并不与公众利益一致的特殊利益的话，“PeertoPatent”也不免沦为维持现状的工具。

5.If the assets of the association devolve on the Treasury, the provisions on an inheritance that devolves on the Treasury as the heir on intestacy apply with the necessary modifications.

社团的财产归属于国库的，准用关于归属于作为法定继承人的国库的遗产的规定。

6.Men who are denied affection for too long devolve into some kind of rage-filled hominoid. Their anger becomes palpable. You can almost feel the wrath emanating from their pores.

他们因为长年没有情感滋润，甚至退化成脾气暴躁的类人猿，甚至从他们的每个毛孔里你都能看出他们的暴躁来。

7.As the project progresses, tasks may devolve to junior staff members.

随着项目的推进，任务可能会转交给初级员工。

8.If we don't manage our resources well, our situation could devolve into chaos.

如果我们不善于管理资源，我们的情况可能会恶化为混乱。

9.The central government may devolve powers to local authorities to improve governance.

中央政府可能会下放权力给地方当局，以改善治理。

10.The responsibility will devolve onto the next team if we fail to meet the deadline.

如果我们未能按时完成，责任将转移到下一个团队。

11.The meeting's focus began to devolve into unrelated topics.

会议的焦点开始偏离到无关的话题上。

作文

In recent years, there has been an increasing debate about the role of government and whether power should be centralized or allowed to devolve (下放) to local authorities. The concept of devolve (下放) power is not new; it has been a topic of discussion in political circles for decades. Many argue that when power is devolve (下放) to local governments, it allows for more tailored and effective solutions to regional issues. Local leaders often have a better understanding of their communities' needs and can respond more swiftly to challenges they face.However, others caution against the complete devolve (下放) of power, arguing that it may lead to inconsistencies in policy and governance across a nation. For instance, if education policies are devolve (下放) to individual states or districts, some areas may excel while others may struggle, leading to significant disparities in educational quality. This could ultimately affect the overall progress of a country.Moreover, the devolve (下放) of power can also raise concerns about accountability. When decisions are made at a local level, it may become more challenging to hold leaders accountable for their actions. Citizens may find it difficult to track who is responsible for certain policies or decisions, which can lead to a lack of trust in local governance.Despite these concerns, the argument for devolve (下放) power often hinges on the idea of democracy and representation. Local governments are typically closer to the people they serve, making it easier for citizens to voice their opinions and influence decisions. This grassroots approach to governance can foster a sense of community and encourage civic engagement.In addition, devolve (下放) power can promote innovation. Local governments, unbound by the constraints of federal policies, may experiment with new ideas and approaches to solve problems. This can lead to creative solutions that might not emerge in a more centralized system. For example, cities have implemented unique public transportation initiatives that cater specifically to their populations, demonstrating how localized decision-making can yield positive results.Furthermore, as global challenges such as climate change become more pressing, the need for localized responses becomes even clearer. Issues like environmental sustainability often vary significantly from one region to another, and what works in one area may not be effective in another. By allowing power to devolve (下放) to local authorities, regions can tailor their strategies to address specific environmental concerns effectively.In conclusion, the debate over whether to devolve (下放) power continues to be a critical issue in modern governance. While there are valid concerns regarding accountability and consistency, the benefits of localized decision-making—such as increased responsiveness, innovation, and community engagement—cannot be overlooked. As societies evolve and face new challenges, finding the right balance between centralization and devolve (下放) power may be key to achieving effective governance in the future.

近年来，关于政府角色的辩论日益增多，讨论是否应将权力集中或允许其下放给地方当局。权力下放的概念并不新鲜；几十年来，它一直是政治圈讨论的话题。许多人认为，当权力下放给地方政府时，可以为地区问题提供更量身定制和有效的解决方案。地方领导者通常更了解其社区的需求，并能更迅速地应对所面临的挑战。然而，其他人则警告完全下放权力可能导致全国政策和治理的不一致。例如，如果教育政策下放给各州或学区，一些地区可能会表现出色，而另一些地区可能会挣扎，从而导致教育质量的显著差异。这最终可能影响一个国家的整体进步。此外，权力下放还可能引发问责制的问题。当决策在地方层面做出时，可能会变得更加困难以追究领导人的责任。公民可能发现很难追踪某些政策或决策的责任人，这可能导致对地方治理的信任缺失。尽管存在这些担忧，权力下放的论点往往围绕民主和代表性展开。地方政府通常更接近他们服务的人民，使公民更容易表达意见并影响决策。这种自下而上的治理方法可以促进社区感并鼓励公民参与。此外，权力下放还可以促进创新。地方政府不受联邦政策的限制，可以尝试新的想法和方法来解决问题。这可能导致那些在更集中的系统中可能不会出现的创造性解决方案。例如，各城市实施了独特的公共交通倡议，专门满足其人口需求，展示了地方决策如何产生积极结果。此外，随着气候变化等全球性挑战变得愈加紧迫，对地方化响应的需求变得更加清晰。环境可持续性等问题在不同地区之间差异显著，适用于一个地区的方法可能在另一个地区无效。通过允许权力下放给地方当局，各地区可以量身定制其策略，以有效应对特定的环境问题。总之，关于是否下放权力的辩论仍然是现代治理中的关键问题。虽然关于问责制和一致性存在合理的担忧，但地方决策的好处——如增强的响应能力、创新和社区参与——不容忽视。随着社会的发展和面临新挑战，找到集中与权力下放之间的正确平衡，可能是未来实现有效治理的关键。