conscription
简明释义
n. 征兵;征兵制度;征用
英英释义
The compulsory enlistment of people, typically into the armed forces. | 通常指强制性征兵,通常是指进入武装部队。 |
单词用法
军事征兵 | |
征兵服务 | |
自愿征兵 | |
征兵政策 | |
实施征兵 | |
反对征兵 | |
征兵通知 | |
免于征兵 |
同义词
反义词
志愿服务 | 许多年轻人选择志愿服务而不是征兵。 | ||
征兵豁免 | Some individuals qualify for draft exemption due to their circumstances. | 一些人因其情况而获得征兵豁免。 |
例句
1.The man flee to the mountain to avoid the conscription.
为了逃避征兵,那个人躲到山里去了。
2.Mr Zu Guttenberg has done one big thing: ending conscription, which had been a bulwark of Germany's post-war order.
另外,古滕贝格还做了一件大事:结束征兵制度,这个曾经是德国战后秩序的一个壁垒。
3.Conscription was ended in 1973, by which time the Vietnam war had anyway turned public opinion against it.
在1973年,兵役制就被废止了,好在是美国反越战舆论矛头指向兵役制之前。
4.Germany is to suspend military conscription from next July.
从明年七月起,德国将中止军事征招制度。
5.By yesterday, the Shanghai 2008 winter conscription medical work in full swing on the first day.
本报讯昨天,是上海2008年冬季征兵体检工作全面展开的第一天。
6.Conscription is universal; men serve 10 years and women seven.
征兵在这个国家来说相当普遍,男性通常要服役10年,而女性要服役7年。
7.Your body is in full compliance with the requirements of conscription.
你的身体完全符合征兵要求。
8.Support for conscription was a badge of identity for the CDU;
支持征兵是基民盟的典型标志;
9.One way around this would be for Afghanistan to reintroduce conscription, as Hamid Karzai suggested this month at a conference in Munich.
解决办法之一是像Hamid Karzai本月在慕尼黑会议上建议的那样,阿富汗再度征兵。
10.The government announced a new policy on conscription 征兵 to increase military personnel.
政府宣布了一项关于征兵 征兵的新政策,以增加军队人员。
11.During wartime, many countries rely on conscription 征兵 to fill their ranks.
在战争期间,许多国家依靠征兵 征兵来填补军队的空缺。
12.Many young men dread the possibility of conscription 征兵 after graduating from school.
许多年轻人在毕业后害怕被征兵 征兵的可能性。
13.His family was against conscription 征兵, believing it infringed on personal freedoms.
他的家人反对征兵 征兵,认为这侵犯了个人自由。
14.The debate over conscription 征兵 has been a contentious issue in many democracies.
关于征兵 征兵的辩论在许多民主国家中一直是一个有争议的问题。
作文
Throughout history, many nations have faced the necessity of maintaining a strong military presence to protect their sovereignty and interests. One of the most significant methods employed by governments to achieve this goal is through conscription, a system that requires citizens to serve in the armed forces for a certain period. While conscription has been a controversial topic, it plays a crucial role in shaping a nation's military capabilities and societal structure.The concept of conscription can be traced back to ancient civilizations, where city-states would draft young men into their armies during times of war. This practice ensured that a sufficient number of soldiers were available to defend the state. In modern times, conscription has been implemented in various forms across different countries, especially during major conflicts like World War I and World War II. Nations such as the United States, Russia, and Israel have used conscription to bolster their military forces when volunteer enlistments fell short.One of the primary advantages of conscription is that it creates a large and diverse pool of military personnel. By mandating service from a broad segment of the population, governments can ensure that their armed forces are representative of the society they protect. This diversity can enhance unit cohesion and effectiveness, as soldiers from different backgrounds bring unique perspectives and skills to the battlefield.However, conscription also raises significant ethical and moral questions. For many individuals, being compelled to serve in the military can be seen as a violation of personal freedom. Critics argue that conscription disproportionately affects lower-income individuals who may have fewer options to avoid service, leading to an inequitable burden on certain segments of society. Additionally, the psychological impact of mandatory military service can be profound, as young people are thrust into life-threatening situations against their will.Moreover, the debate over conscription often intersects with discussions about national security and military strategy. Proponents argue that a conscripted army can be more effective in times of crisis, providing a rapid influx of trained personnel ready to respond to threats. On the other hand, opponents contend that a professional volunteer army is more motivated and better trained, as soldiers choose to serve out of a sense of duty rather than obligation.In recent years, some countries have moved away from conscription in favor of an all-volunteer military force. This shift reflects changing societal values and the belief that military service should be a choice rather than a mandate. However, the reintroduction of conscription remains a possibility in response to emerging global threats, as governments must balance the need for a capable military with the rights of individuals.In conclusion, conscription is a complex and multifaceted issue that encompasses historical, ethical, and strategic dimensions. While it has been instrumental in building and sustaining military forces throughout history, it also poses significant challenges regarding individual rights and societal equity. As nations navigate the ever-changing landscape of global security, the debate over conscription will likely continue, reflecting the ongoing tension between collective responsibility and personal freedom.
在历史上,许多国家面临着维护强大军事力量以保护其主权和利益的必要性。政府为实现这一目标所采用的最重要的方法之一就是通过征兵,一种要求公民在武装部队服役一定时间的制度。虽然征兵一直是一个有争议的话题,但它在塑造国家军事能力和社会结构方面发挥着至关重要的作用。征兵的概念可以追溯到古代文明,当时城邦在战争时期会征召年轻男性入伍。这种做法确保了足够数量的士兵可用于保卫国家。在现代,征兵以不同形式在各国实施,尤其是在第一次和第二次世界大战等重大冲突期间。美国、俄罗斯和以色列等国家在志愿征兵不足时,利用征兵来增强军队力量。征兵的主要优点之一是它创造了一个庞大而多样化的军事人员库。通过强制服务于广泛的社会群体,政府可以确保其武装部队代表其保护的社会。这种多样性可以增强部队的凝聚力和有效性,因为来自不同背景的士兵为战场带来了独特的视角和技能。然而,征兵也引发了重大的伦理和道德问题。对于许多人来说,被迫在军队服役可能被视为对个人自由的侵犯。批评者认为,征兵不成比例地影响低收入个体,他们可能没有太多选择来避免服役,从而导致社会某些群体承受不公平的负担。此外,强制军事服务的心理影响可能是深远的,因为年轻人被迫置身于生死攸关的境地。此外,关于征兵的辩论常常与国家安全和军事战略的讨论交织在一起。支持者认为,在危机时期,征召军队可以更有效地提供训练有素的人员快速响应威胁。另一方面,反对者则认为,职业志愿军更有动力和训练,因为士兵出于责任感而选择服役,而不是出于义务。近年来,一些国家已经转向全志愿军,放弃征兵。这种转变反映了社会价值观的变化,以及对军事服务应该是选择而非强制的信念。然而,面对新兴全球威胁,重新引入征兵仍然是一个可能性,因为政府必须在需要一支能干的军队与个人权利之间找到平衡。总之,征兵是一个复杂而多面的议题,涵盖了历史、伦理和战略维度。虽然它在历史上构建和维持军队方面发挥了重要作用,但它也在个人权利和社会公平方面带来了重大挑战。随着各国在不断变化的全球安全格局中航行,关于征兵的辩论可能会继续,反映出集体责任与个人自由之间的持续紧张关系。