theocracy

简明释义

英[θiˈɒkrəsi]美[θiˈɑːkrəsi]

n. 神政；神权政体；神治国（复数 theocracies）

复 数 t h e o c r a c i e s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Even now quasi - theocracy dies hard.

今天，即使是“准神权”也难以轻易消逝。

2.The theocracy equated rebellious thought and action with Satanic influence.

神权把任何反抗的思想和行为归为魔鬼的影响。

3.Iran, which once held so much sway, is not talked of as a model: theocracy does not appeal to the youngsters on the Arab street.

伊朗，曾经像个墙头草一样，摇摆不定，不能称之为典范。神权对阿拉伯街头的年轻人来说，没有什么吸引力。

4.I had hardly been outside my hotel, and already I realized that visiting a theocracy would be a memorable experience.

我几乎没有走出酒店就已经意识到访问一个神权统治的国家一定会是一种难忘的经历。

5.As private ownership appeared in Xia Dynasty and Shang Dynasty, theocracy became more and more prominent.

随着私有制的出现，夏、商时期，神权思想越来越严重。

6.Iran, which once held so much sway, is not talked of as a model: theocracy does not appeal to the youngsters on the Arab street.

伊朗，曾经像个墙头草一样，摇摆不定，不能称之为典范。神权对阿拉伯街头的年轻人来说，没有什么吸引力。

7.Many of the monasteries are closed, and much of the theocracy seems to have passed into history.

许多寺庙已经关闭，以及大部分的神权似乎已成为历史。

8.Iran is often cited as a modern example of a theocracy.

伊朗常被引用为现代神权政治的例子。

9.In a theocracy, laws are often based on religious texts.

在神权政治中，法律通常基于宗教经典。

10.The concept of theocracy dates back to ancient civilizations, where rulers claimed divine guidance.

神权政治的概念可以追溯到古代文明，那时统治者声称得到神的指导。

11.Critics argue that a theocracy can lead to the oppression of those who do not share the same beliefs.

批评者认为，神权政治可能导致对不同信仰者的压迫。

12.In a theocracy, the religious leaders hold the ultimate authority over the government.

在神权政治中，宗教领袖对政府拥有最终权力。

作文

The concept of theocracy is one that has been prevalent in various cultures and societies throughout history. A theocracy is a form of government in which religious leaders control the government, and the state's legal system is based on religious law. This type of governance can be seen as a fusion of political and religious authority, where the divine will is interpreted by those in power. The implications of a theocracy can be profound, influencing not only the political landscape but also the daily lives of citizens. In a theocracy, the laws of the land are often derived from sacred texts or religious doctrines. This can lead to a society that is deeply intertwined with its religious beliefs, where moral and ethical standards are dictated by religious teachings. For example, in Iran, the government operates under a theocracy, where the Supreme Leader, who is a religious figure, holds significant power over the state. This intertwining of religion and politics can create a sense of unity among followers of the faith, but it can also lead to tension and conflict with those who hold different beliefs.One of the most significant challenges of a theocracy is the potential for oppression of dissenting voices. In many theocratic systems, individuals who do not adhere to the state-sanctioned religion may face discrimination, persecution, or even violence. This raises important questions about human rights and freedom of belief. In a truly democratic society, individuals should have the right to practice their religion freely or to choose not to follow any religion at all. However, in a theocracy, this right can be severely limited.Furthermore, the nature of governance in a theocracy can lead to a lack of accountability and transparency. When leaders claim to represent the divine will, they may feel justified in making decisions without consulting the populace or considering their needs. This can result in a disconnect between the government and the governed, leading to social unrest and dissatisfaction. Citizens may feel powerless to effect change in a system where their voices are overshadowed by religious authority.Despite these challenges, there are arguments in favor of theocracy. Proponents argue that a government guided by spiritual principles can promote moral behavior and social cohesion. In societies where religion plays a central role in people's lives, a theocracy may be seen as a natural extension of their beliefs. Supporters might contend that such a system fosters a sense of purpose and community among its citizens, as they share common values and goals rooted in their faith.In conclusion, the concept of theocracy presents a complex interplay between religion and governance. While it can provide a framework for moral and ethical living, it also poses significant risks to individual freedoms and societal harmony. As we navigate the diverse political landscapes of our world, it is crucial to critically examine the implications of theocracy and strive for systems that respect both religious beliefs and the fundamental rights of all individuals. Understanding the intricacies of theocracy allows us to engage in meaningful discussions about the role of religion in government and the impact it has on society as a whole.

“神权政治”这一概念在历史上各种文化和社会中广泛存在。“神权政治”是一种由宗教领袖控制政府的统治形式，国家的法律体系基于宗教法。这种治理类型可以被视为政治与宗教权威的融合，在这种体制下，神圣意志由掌权者进行解释。“神权政治”的影响深远，不仅影响政治格局，还影响公民的日常生活。在“神权政治”中，国家的法律往往源自神圣文本或宗教教义。这可能导致一个与其宗教信仰紧密相连的社会，在这个社会中，道德和伦理标准由宗教教义决定。例如，在伊朗，政府在“神权政治”的框架下运作，最高领袖是宗教人物，拥有对国家的重大权力。这种宗教与政治的交织可以在信仰的追随者之间创造一种团结感，但也可能导致与持有不同信仰的人之间的紧张和冲突。“神权政治”最显著的挑战之一是压迫异议声音的潜力。在许多“神权政治”体制中，不遵循国家认可宗教的个人可能面临歧视、迫害甚至暴力。这引发了关于人权和信仰自由的重要问题。在一个真正民主的社会中，个人应该有权自由地实践他们的宗教或选择不遵循任何宗教。然而，在“神权政治”中，这一权利可能会受到严重限制。此外，“神权政治”中的治理性质可能导致缺乏问责制和透明度。当领导者声称代表神圣意志时，他们可能会觉得自己有权在不咨询民众或考虑他们需求的情况下做出决定。这可能导致政府与被治理者之间的脱节，从而导致社会动荡和不满。公民可能会感到在一个他们的声音被宗教权威淹没的体制中无能为力。尽管面临这些挑战，但也有人支持“神权政治”。支持者认为，受精神原则指导的政府可以促进道德行为和社会凝聚力。在宗教在人民生活中发挥核心作用的社会中，“神权政治”可能被视为其信仰的自然延伸。支持者可能会主张，这种制度促进了公民之间的目的感和共同体，因为他们共享根植于信仰的共同价值观和目标。总之，“神权政治”这一概念展现了宗教与治理之间复杂的相互作用。虽然它可以为道德和伦理生活提供框架，但也对个人自由和社会和谐构成重大风险。当我们在多样的政治格局中航行时，批判性地审视“神权政治”的影响并努力争取尊重宗教信仰和所有个人基本权利的制度至关重要。理解“神权政治”的复杂性使我们能够就宗教在政府中的作用及其对整个社会的影响进行有意义的讨论。