testimony of witness

简明释义

人证

英英释义

例句

1.The jury found the testimony of witness to be compelling evidence in the case.

陪审团认为证人证词是案件中有力的证据。

2.During the trial, the lawyer challenged the credibility of the testimony of witness.

在审判期间，律师质疑了证人证词的可信度。

3.The defense attorney argued that the testimony of witness was biased.

辩护律师辩称证人证词存在偏见。

4.The judge carefully considered the testimony of witness before making a ruling.

法官在做出裁决之前仔细考虑了证人证词。

5.After hearing the testimony of witness, the police decided to reopen the investigation.

在听取了证人证词后，警方决定重新调查。

作文

The justice system relies heavily on the testimony of witness to establish the facts of a case. When an incident occurs, witnesses are often the only source of information that can help determine what really happened. Their accounts can provide crucial details that may not be captured in physical evidence. For instance, in a robbery case, a witness might describe the appearance of the suspect, the direction they fled, or even the time of the incident. This information can be pivotal in identifying and apprehending the perpetrator. However, the reliability of the testimony of witness can sometimes be called into question. Human memory is not infallible; it can be influenced by various factors such as stress, time elapsed since the event, and even leading questions from investigators. Studies have shown that eyewitness testimonies can be inaccurate, leading to wrongful convictions. This is why it is essential for law enforcement and judicial systems to approach witness statements carefully and corroborate them with other forms of evidence whenever possible. Moreover, the testimony of witness can vary significantly between individuals. Two people may witness the same event but interpret it differently based on their perspectives, backgrounds, and biases. This subjectivity can complicate legal proceedings, as jurors must weigh conflicting testimonies and decide which account to believe. The introduction of expert witnesses in some cases can help clarify these discrepancies, offering insights into how memory works and the factors that can affect it. In addition to criminal cases, the testimony of witness also plays a vital role in civil litigation. In disputes involving contracts, personal injury, or property damage, witnesses can provide evidence that supports one party's claims over another. Their statements can help establish liability and influence the outcome of the case. For example, in a car accident lawsuit, witnesses who saw the crash can testify about the circumstances leading up to the collision, potentially swaying the court’s decision. The importance of the testimony of witness extends beyond the courtroom. It can shape public opinion and influence societal norms. High-profile cases often garner media attention, and the testimonies provided can lead to widespread discussions about justice, accountability, and reform. When witnesses come forward to share their experiences, they contribute to a collective understanding of events that can lead to significant changes in policies and practices. In conclusion, while the testimony of witness is a cornerstone of the legal system, its complexities cannot be overlooked. It is essential to recognize both its power and its limitations. As society continues to evolve, so too must our approaches to gathering and evaluating witness statements. By fostering an environment where accurate and truthful testimonies can be obtained, we can enhance the integrity of our justice system and ensure that it serves its fundamental purpose: to uphold the truth and deliver justice. In summary, the testimony of witness (证人证言) is crucial in establishing facts in both criminal and civil cases, but it requires careful scrutiny to ensure its reliability and accuracy.

司法系统在很大程度上依赖于证人证言来建立案件事实。当事件发生时，证人往往是帮助确定真实情况的唯一信息来源。他们的叙述可以提供关键细节，这些细节可能不会在物证中被捕捉到。例如，在一起抢劫案件中，证人可能会描述嫌疑人的外貌、他们逃跑的方向，甚至是事件发生的时间。这些信息在识别和逮捕罪犯方面可能至关重要。然而，证人证言的可靠性有时会受到质疑。人类的记忆并不是无懈可击的；它可能受到各种因素的影响，例如压力、事件发生后的时间以及调查人员的引导性问题。研究表明，目击者的证词可能不准确，导致错误定罪。这就是为什么执法和司法系统必须小心处理证人陈述，并尽可能用其他证据来证实它们的重要性。此外，证人证言在不同个体之间可能存在显著差异。两个人可能目睹同一事件，但根据他们的视角、背景和偏见对其进行不同的解读。这种主观性可能会使法律程序复杂化，因为陪审员必须权衡相互矛盾的证词，并决定相信哪个叙述。在某些情况下，专家证人的引入可以帮助澄清这些差异，提供有关记忆如何运作及其可能受到影响的因素的见解。除了刑事案件，证人证言在民事诉讼中也发挥着至关重要的作用。在涉及合同、个人伤害或财产损害的争议中，证人可以提供支持一方主张的证据。他们的陈述可以帮助确立责任并影响案件的结果。例如，在一起车祸诉讼中，目击者看到事故可以作证关于碰撞发生前的情况，可能影响法庭的裁决。证人证言的重要性超出了法庭。它可以塑造公众舆论并影响社会规范。高调案件通常会引起媒体关注，而提供的证词可能导致关于正义、问责和改革的广泛讨论。当证人站出来分享他们的经历时，他们为对事件的集体理解做出了贡献，这可能导致政策和实践的重大变化。总之，虽然证人证言是法律系统的基石，但其复杂性不容忽视。必须认识到它的力量和局限性。随着社会的不断发展，我们对收集和评估证人陈述的方法也必须不断演变。通过营造一个能够获得准确和真实证词的环境，我们可以增强司法系统的完整性，确保其履行基本目的：维护真相和实现正义。总之，证人证言（testimony of witness）在建立刑事和民事案件事实方面至关重要，但它需要仔细审查以确保其可靠性和准确性。