alarmist

简明释义

英[əˈlɑːmɪst]美[əˈlɑːrmɪst]

adj. 危言耸听的，大惊小怪的

n. 大惊小怪者，杞人忧天者

复 数 a l a r m i s t s

比 较 级 m o r e a l a r m i s t

最 高 级 m o s t a l a r m i s t

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.But while parts of the document seem overly alarmist, there are a couple of legitimate points.

不过，虽然文件的某些部分似乎过于危言耸听，有两个合法的地方。

2.Officials dismiss this as alarmist. But Lula is worried enough to have attended a recent meeting of his for the first time.

官员们都认为这是杞人忧天拒不接受，但是卢拉对此十分担心，并且破例第一次参加了巴西国家能源政策委员会（National Energy Policy Council）的最近一期会议。

3.Part of what alarms his critics is how un-alarmist his conclusions have turned out to be.

警报批评的部分并非危言耸听，他的结论已证明确有此事。

4.Other investors say this is alarmist nonsense.

其他投资者认为这不过是危言耸听的无稽之谈。

5.This may sound alarming but this is not alarmist.

这可能听起来令人震惊，但是这绝不是危言耸听。

6.They say, 'It's not so bad' or 'You're seeing things' or' You're an alarmist. '.

他们说，‘还不算太坏’，‘你看到了’，或者‘你说的倒是蛮吓人的’。

7.While some may see the warnings as alarmist, they still serve to raise awareness about important issues.

虽然有些人可能将这些警告视为危言耸听，但它们仍然有助于提高人们对重要问题的关注。

8.Many scientists argue that the alarmist predictions about climate change are not based on solid evidence.

许多科学家认为关于气候变化的危言耸听预测并没有扎实的证据支持。

9.The news report was criticized for being too alarmist, creating unnecessary panic among the public.

这则新闻报道因过于危言耸听而受到批评，造成公众的不必要恐慌。

10.His alarmist rhetoric during the debate turned off many voters who preferred a more measured approach.

他在辩论中危言耸听的言辞让许多选民感到厌烦，他们更喜欢一种更加稳妥的方法。

11.The alarmist tone of the article made it difficult to discern the actual risks involved.

文章的危言耸听语气使得人们难以辨别实际风险。

作文

In today's world, we are constantly bombarded with information about various global issues, from climate change to economic instability. Among the voices we hear, there are those who can be classified as alarmists. These individuals often exaggerate the dangers of certain situations, creating a sense of panic and urgency that may not always be warranted. While it is essential to be aware of potential threats, the role of an alarmist can sometimes lead to misinformation and unnecessary fear.The term alarmist refers to someone who raises alarms about issues, often emphasizing the worst-case scenarios. For instance, in discussions about climate change, an alarmist might claim that we are on the brink of extinction if immediate action is not taken. While it is true that climate change is a significant threat, such extreme statements can cause people to become desensitized or dismissive over time, leading them to tune out important warnings altogether.Moreover, alarmists can also be found in other areas, such as health crises. During the COVID-19 pandemic, some media outlets and public figures adopted an alarmist tone, suggesting that the virus would wipe out entire populations. This approach, while intended to spur action, can result in widespread anxiety and panic, which may hinder effective responses to the actual crisis.On the other hand, it is crucial to recognize that not all warnings are alarmist. Some experts genuinely believe that their concerns are based on solid evidence and research. The challenge lies in distinguishing between justified alarm and undue hysteria. It is essential for the public to critically evaluate the sources of information and the motivations behind them.To combat the influence of alarmists, we can adopt a more balanced approach to discussing global issues. This involves acknowledging the seriousness of problems without resorting to sensationalism. For example, instead of saying that climate change will lead to the end of humanity, we could discuss how it poses significant risks to ecosystems and human livelihoods, urging people to take action without inducing panic.Furthermore, education plays a vital role in this process. By fostering critical thinking skills, we can equip individuals to discern between credible information and alarmist rhetoric. Schools and communities should encourage open discussions about pressing issues, promoting an environment where questions can be asked, and diverse viewpoints can be considered.In conclusion, while alarmists play a role in raising awareness about critical issues, their exaggerated claims can lead to fear and confusion. It is essential to approach these topics with a balanced perspective, recognizing the importance of informed action without succumbing to panic. By promoting education and critical thinking, we can better navigate the complexities of the modern world and respond effectively to the challenges we face.

在当今世界，我们不断受到关于各种全球问题的信息轰炸，从气候变化到经济不稳定。在我们听到的声音中，有些人可以被归类为警报主义者。这些人往往夸大某些情况的危险性，制造一种可能并不总是合理的恐慌和紧迫感。虽然意识到潜在威胁至关重要，但警报主义者的角色有时会导致错误信息和不必要的恐惧。术语警报主义者指的是那些对问题发出警报的人，通常强调最坏的情况。例如，在关于气候变化的讨论中，警报主义者可能声称如果不立即采取行动，我们就处于灭绝的边缘。虽然气候变化确实是一个重大威胁，但如此极端的说法可能导致人们逐渐麻木或不屑一顾，最终使他们对重要警告的关注度下降。此外，警报主义者还可以在其他领域找到，例如健康危机。在COVID-19大流行期间，一些媒体和公众人物采取了警报主义者的语气，暗示这种病毒将消灭整个种群。这种方法虽然旨在促使采取行动，但可能导致广泛的焦虑和恐慌，从而妨碍对实际危机的有效应对。另一方面，必须认识到并非所有的警告都是警报主义者的。某些专家确实相信，他们的担忧是基于可靠的证据和研究。挑战在于区分合理的警报和不必要的歇斯底里。公众必须批判性地评估信息来源及其背后的动机。为了对抗警报主义者的影响，我们可以采取更为平衡的方式来讨论全球问题。这涉及到承认问题的严重性，而不诉诸于耸人听闻的言辞。例如，可以讨论气候变化对生态系统和人类生计构成重大风险，而不是说气候变化将导致人类的终结，鼓励人们采取行动，而不是引发恐慌。此外，教育在这个过程中发挥着至关重要的作用。通过培养批判性思维能力，我们可以使个人具备辨别可信信息和警报主义者修辞的能力。学校和社区应该鼓励关于紧迫问题的开放讨论，促进一个可以提出问题和考虑多样观点的环境。总之，虽然警报主义者在提高对关键问题的认识方面发挥了一定作用，但他们的夸大言论可能导致恐惧和困惑。以平衡的视角看待这些话题至关重要，既要认识到采取知情行动的重要性，又不要屈从于恐慌。通过促进教育和批判性思维，我们可以更好地应对现代世界的复杂性，并有效应对我们面临的挑战。