tangential point

简明释义

切点

英英释义

例句

1.While discussing the budget, Sarah brought up a tangential point regarding team morale, which sparked a side conversation.

在讨论预算时，萨拉提到了一个关于团队士气的旁枝末节，引发了一场侧面的对话。

2.During the meeting, John made a tangential point about the marketing strategy that was interesting but not directly related to the main discussion.

在会议上，约翰提出了一个关于市场策略的旁枝末节，虽然很有趣，但与主要讨论无关。

3.The report contained a tangential point about future trends that was not relevant to the current analysis.

报告中包含了一个关于未来趋势的旁枝末节，与当前分析无关。

4.In her presentation, Lisa made a tangential point about environmental issues that caught everyone's attention.

在她的演示中，丽莎提到了一个关于环境问题的旁枝末节，引起了大家的注意。

5.The professor's lecture included a tangential point about historical events that were not part of the syllabus.

教授的讲座中包含了一个关于历史事件的旁枝末节，这些事件并不在课程大纲中。

作文

In discussions and debates, it is not uncommon for participants to stray from the main topic, often bringing up what are known as tangential points. These are ideas or arguments that, while related to the broader subject, do not directly address the core issue at hand. Understanding the nature of tangential points can enhance our ability to engage in productive conversations and maintain focus on the primary objectives.For instance, consider a debate about climate change. A speaker might begin by discussing the importance of reducing carbon emissions but then veer off into a discussion about renewable energy technologies. While this information is certainly relevant, it may not directly contribute to the immediate goal of addressing policy changes needed to combat climate change. In this case, the discussion about renewable energy becomes a tangential point, diverting attention from the central argument.Recognizing tangential points is crucial for effective communication. It allows participants to steer conversations back to the main topic when necessary. In academic writing, for example, a well-structured essay should remain focused on its thesis statement. If an author introduces several tangential points, the reader may become confused about the primary argument being presented. This can dilute the overall impact of the work and lead to misunderstandings.Moreover, the ability to identify tangential points can also help individuals develop critical thinking skills. When we analyze a discussion, we can ask ourselves whether the points being made are essential to the argument or if they simply serve as distractions. This practice not only sharpens our analytical abilities but also enhances our capacity to engage with others meaningfully.In professional settings, the recognition of tangential points is equally important. During meetings, it is easy for discussions to drift into unrelated topics, which can waste time and hinder decision-making processes. By being aware of these diversions, team members can gently guide the conversation back on track, ensuring that all relevant issues are addressed without getting sidetracked.Furthermore, while some tangential points may seem irrelevant at first glance, they can sometimes lead to fruitful discussions. For example, a sidebar conversation about the economic impacts of climate change might initially appear off-topic, but it could ultimately provide valuable insights that enrich the main discussion. Thus, while it is essential to recognize and manage tangential points, we should also remain open to the possibility that these diversions can contribute positively to the overall dialogue.In conclusion, understanding and managing tangential points is a vital skill in both personal and professional communication. By focusing on the main topics and being aware of potential distractions, we can foster more meaningful and productive conversations. Whether in debates, academic writing, or workplace discussions, the ability to discern and address tangential points will ultimately lead to clearer communication and better outcomes.

在讨论和辩论中，参与者偏离主题的情况并不少见，他们常常提出被称为切题点的观点。这些观点或论据虽然与更广泛的主题相关，但并不直接解决核心问题。理解切题点的性质可以增强我们参与富有成效的对话的能力，并保持对主要目标的关注。例如，考虑一次关于气候变化的辩论。一位发言者可能开始讨论减少碳排放的重要性，但随后转而讨论可再生能源技术。虽然这些信息确实相关，但它可能并没有直接贡献于应对气候变化所需的政策变化的即时目标。在这种情况下，关于可再生能源的讨论就成为了一个切题点，使注意力偏离了核心论点。识别切题点对有效沟通至关重要。这使得参与者能够在必要时将对话引导回主要主题。在学术写作中，例如，一篇结构良好的文章应该保持对其论点的关注。如果作者引入多个切题点，读者可能会对所呈现的主要论点感到困惑。这可能会削弱作品的整体影响力，并导致误解。此外，识别切题点的能力也可以帮助个人发展批判性思维技能。当我们分析一场讨论时，我们可以问自己，所提出的观点是否对论证至关重要，还是仅仅作为干扰存在。这种实践不仅能提高我们的分析能力，还能增强我们与他人进行有意义互动的能力。在专业环境中，识别切题点同样重要。在会议期间，讨论很容易偏离无关的话题，这可能浪费时间并妨碍决策过程。通过意识到这些分歧，团队成员可以温和地将对话引导回正轨，确保所有相关问题都得到解决，而不会偏离主题。此外，尽管某些切题点乍一看似乎不相关，但它们有时可能会引发富有成效的讨论。例如，关于气候变化经济影响的旁谈最初可能显得无关紧要，但最终可能提供丰富的见解，丰富主要讨论。因此，虽然识别和管理切题点至关重要，但我们也应该保持开放的态度，认为这些偏离可能对整体对话产生积极贡献。总之，理解和管理切题点是个人和专业沟通中的一项重要技能。通过关注主要话题并意识到潜在的干扰，我们可以促进更有意义和富有成效的对话。无论是在辩论、学术写作还是工作场所讨论中，辨别和处理切题点的能力最终将导致更清晰的沟通和更好的结果。