tangential admission

简明释义

切向进汽

英英释义

例句

1.His tangential admission 附带承认 regarding his lack of preparation surprised everyone in the room.

他关于缺乏准备的附带承认 让房间里的每个人都感到惊讶。

2.The CEO's tangential admission 附带承认 of past failures was unexpected but appreciated by the staff.

首席执行官的附带承认 过去失败的事情是出乎意料的，但员工们对此表示赞赏。

3.During the meeting, Sarah made a tangential admission 附带承认 about her previous mistakes, which diverted the topic from the main agenda.

在会议期间，萨拉做了一项附带承认 关于她之前错误的承认，这使得话题偏离了主要议程。

4.The lawyer's tangential admission 附带承认 during cross-examination raised doubts about the credibility of the witness.

律师在交叉询问中的附带承认 引发了对证人可信度的怀疑。

5.In her speech, she included a tangential admission 附带承认 about her struggles, which resonated with the audience.

在她的演讲中，她提到了一项附带承认 关于她挣扎的事情，这引起了观众的共鸣。

作文

In the realm of communication, particularly in writing and public speaking, clarity and focus are paramount. However, there are instances when speakers or writers introduce elements that may seem unrelated to the main topic. This phenomenon can be described as a tangential admission, which refers to a comment or statement that deviates from the primary subject but is nonetheless acknowledged by the speaker. While such admissions can sometimes enrich the discourse, they can also lead to confusion if not handled carefully.Consider the example of a professor delivering a lecture on climate change. During the lecture, the professor might make a tangential admission about their personal experiences hiking in the mountains and noticing changes in the landscape. While this anecdote adds a personal touch and may engage students, it diverges from the scientific data being presented. The challenge lies in ensuring that this tangential admission does not overshadow the critical information being conveyed.Writers, too, often face the temptation to include tangential admissions in their work. A novelist might weave in a character's backstory that, while intriguing, does not directly contribute to the plot's advancement. Such digressions can enrich character development but can also risk losing the reader's attention if they are not relevant to the central narrative.The effectiveness of a tangential admission hinges on its execution. When used judiciously, these admissions can serve to illustrate a point, provide context, or humanize the speaker or writer. For instance, a politician discussing economic policies might briefly mention their childhood experiences with poverty. This tangential admission could resonate with the audience, providing a relatable backdrop to their policy proposals.However, the danger of excessive or poorly timed tangential admissions cannot be overlooked. They can dilute the message, leading listeners or readers to become sidetracked. In a world where attention spans are dwindling, maintaining focus is crucial for effective communication. Therefore, it is essential to strike a balance between engaging storytelling and staying on topic.In conclusion, tangential admissions can be a double-edged sword in communication. They have the potential to enrich a narrative or discourse, providing depth and relatability. However, if overused or mismanaged, they can detract from the main message, leaving audiences confused or disengaged. Understanding when and how to incorporate these admissions is key to mastering the art of communication, whether in writing or speaking. Ultimately, the goal should always be to enhance understanding and maintain clarity, allowing the audience to grasp the core message without unnecessary distractions.

在交流的领域，特别是在写作和演讲中，清晰和重点至关重要。然而，有时演讲者或作者会引入一些似乎与主要主题无关的元素。这种现象可以被描述为旁支承认，它指的是一种偏离主要主题的评论或陈述，但仍然被说话者所承认。尽管这种承认有时可以丰富讨论，但如果处理不当，也可能导致混乱。考虑一个教授在气候变化讲座中的例子。在讲座中，教授可能会做出一个旁支承认，谈论他们在山中徒步旅行时注意到的景观变化。虽然这个轶事增添了个人色彩并可能吸引学生，但它偏离了正在呈现的科学数据。挑战在于确保这个旁支承认不会遮蔽所传达的重要信息。作家也常常面临在作品中包含旁支承认的诱惑。小说家可能会编织一个角色的背景故事，虽然引人入胜，但并没有直接推动情节的发展。这种离题的叙述可以丰富角色发展，但如果与中心叙事无关，则可能会使读者失去兴趣。旁支承认的有效性取决于其执行。当审慎使用时，这些承认可以用于说明观点、提供背景或使演讲者或作者更具人性化。例如，一位讨论经济政策的政治家可能会简要提及他们童年贫困的经历。这个旁支承认可能与观众产生共鸣，为他们的政策提案提供一个可关联的背景。然而，过度或时机不当的旁支承认的危险不容忽视。它们可能会稀释信息，使听众或读者分心。在一个注意力持续时间越来越短的世界中，保持重点对于有效的沟通至关重要。因此，找到参与性叙述与保持主题之间的平衡是必不可少的。总之，旁支承认在交流中可以是一把双刃剑。它们有潜力丰富叙述或讨论，提供深度和相关性。然而，如果过度使用或管理不当，它们可能会削弱主要信息，使观众感到困惑或失去兴趣。理解何时以及如何纳入这些承认是掌握交流艺术的关键，无论是在写作还是演讲中。最终，目标应该始终是增强理解和保持清晰，让观众在没有不必要干扰的情况下抓住核心信息。