monologizing
简明释义
英[mɒˈnɒləˌdʒaɪz]美[məˈnɑːlədʒaɪz]
vi. 独白;发表长篇大论
第 三 人 称 单 数 m o n o l o g i z e s
现 在 分 词 m o n o l o g i z i n g
过 去 式 m o n o l o g i z e d
过 去 分 词 m o n o l o g i z e d
英英释义
The act of speaking or expressing one's thoughts aloud, often in a lengthy and self-contained manner without interruption from others. | 以较长且自成一体的方式表达自己思想或进行讲话,通常没有他人打断。 |
单词用法
参与独白 | |
停止独白 | |
厌倦独白 | |
冗长的独白 | |
自我放纵的独白 | |
不间断的独白 |
同义词
自言自语 | 他在镜子前自言自语。 |
反义词
对话 | They spent the evening dialoguing about their different perspectives. | 他们花了一晚上的时间对话,讨论各自的观点。 | |
倾听 | Listening to others is just as important as expressing your own thoughts. | 倾听他人和表达自己的想法同样重要。 |
例句
1.At the party, he was monologizing about his career achievements, making it hard for others to join the conversation.
在派对上,他在独白自己的职业成就,让其他人很难加入对话。
2.The teacher warned the students not to monologize during their presentations, as it could lose the audience's interest.
老师警告学生在演讲时不要独白,因为这可能会失去观众的兴趣。
3.In a therapy session, he found himself monologizing about his feelings without giving his therapist a chance to respond.
在治疗会议上,他发现自己在独白自己的感受,而没有给治疗师回应的机会。
4.During the meeting, John kept monologizing about his recent vacation, which bored everyone.
在会议上,约翰不停地独白他最近的假期,这让大家感到无聊。
5.She realized that she had been monologizing for too long when her friend started looking at their watch.
当她的朋友开始看手表时,她意识到自己已经独白太久了。
作文
In today's fast-paced world, effective communication is more important than ever. However, there is a tendency among some individuals to dominate conversations by engaging in excessive monologizing. This term refers to the act of speaking at length about one’s own thoughts or experiences without allowing others to contribute to the dialogue. While sharing personal stories can be enriching, it becomes problematic when it turns into a one-sided conversation.
One of the primary issues with monologizing is that it stifles the voices of others. In any healthy discussion, all participants should have the opportunity to express their opinions and share their experiences. When someone monopolizes the conversation, it creates an imbalance that can lead to frustration among listeners. They may feel undervalued or ignored, which can ultimately damage relationships. This is particularly evident in group settings, such as meetings or social gatherings, where diverse perspectives are essential for meaningful exchanges.
Moreover, monologizing can hinder personal growth. Engaging in dialogue allows individuals to learn from each other, challenge their own beliefs, and broaden their understanding of various topics. When one person dominates the conversation, they miss out on valuable insights that could come from listening to others. For instance, in a classroom setting, a teacher who engages in monologizing may fail to recognize the unique contributions of students, limiting their learning experience and stifling creativity.
Additionally, monologizing can be a sign of deeper issues, such as insecurity or a need for validation. Individuals who frequently engage in this behavior may feel the need to assert themselves or prove their worth through lengthy speeches. This can stem from a lack of confidence in their ability to connect with others or fear of being judged. Instead of fostering genuine connections, monologizing often leads to superficial interactions that do not fulfill the emotional needs of either party.
To combat the tendency to monologize, it is important to practice active listening. This means being fully present in the conversation and showing genuine interest in what others have to say. By asking open-ended questions and encouraging others to share their thoughts, individuals can create a more inclusive environment that values diverse perspectives. Furthermore, setting time limits for speaking during discussions can help ensure that everyone has an opportunity to contribute.
In conclusion, while sharing personal experiences is an essential part of communication, it is crucial to avoid falling into the trap of monologizing. By fostering a culture of active listening and encouraging open dialogue, we can create more meaningful connections and enrich our interactions with others. Ultimately, effective communication is a two-way street that requires mutual respect and understanding. Therefore, let us strive to balance our contributions in conversations and appreciate the value of listening just as much as speaking.
在当今快节奏的世界中,有效沟通比以往任何时候都更加重要。然而,一些人倾向于通过过度的独白来主导谈话。这个词指的是长时间谈论自己的想法或经历,而不允许他人参与对话。当分享个人故事时,这可能是丰富的,但当它变成单方面的对话时,就会变得有问题。
独白的主要问题之一是它压制了他人的声音。在任何健康的讨论中,所有参与者都应该有机会表达他们的意见并分享他们的经历。当某人垄断谈话时,会造成不平衡,导致听众感到沮丧。他们可能会感到被低估或忽视,这最终会破坏关系。这在小组环境中尤其明显,例如会议或社交聚会,在这些场合中,多样化的观点对于有意义的交流至关重要。
此外,独白还可能阻碍个人成长。参与对话使个人能够相互学习,挑战自己的信念,并拓宽对各种主题的理解。当一个人主导谈话时,他们错过了倾听他人的宝贵见解。例如,在课堂环境中,参与独白的老师可能无法认识到学生的独特贡献,从而限制他们的学习体验并抑制创造力。
此外,独白可能是更深层次问题的迹象,例如不安全感或寻求认可。经常参与这种行为的个人可能会觉得需要通过冗长的演讲来证明自己或证明自己的价值。这可能源于缺乏与他人建立联系的信心或害怕被评判。与其促进真诚的联系,独白往往导致表面的互动,无法满足双方的情感需求。
为了对抗独白的倾向,重要的是要练习积极倾听。这意味着在谈话中全神贯注,表现出对他人所说内容的真正兴趣。通过提出开放式问题并鼓励他人分享他们的想法,个人可以创造一个更具包容性的环境,重视多样化的观点。此外,在讨论中设定发言时间限制可以帮助确保每个人都有机会参与。
总之,尽管分享个人经历是沟通的重要部分,但避免陷入独白的陷阱至关重要。通过培养积极倾听的文化并鼓励开放的对话,我们可以创造更有意义的联系,丰富与他人的互动。最终,有效沟通是一条双向街道,需要相互尊重和理解。因此,让我们努力平衡在对话中的贡献,并同样欣赏倾听的价值。