inculpation

简明释义

英[ˌɪnkʌlˈpeɪʃən]美[ˌɪnkʌlˈpeʃən]

n. 连累；归罪；责难

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Secret investigation is distinct from agent provocateur, because secret policemen have incomplete instigation on purpose, which is short of inculpation.

卧底侦查不同于教唆陷害，卧底警察具有不完整的教唆故意，欠缺可罚性。

2.Secret investigation is distinct from agent provocateur, because secret policemen have incomplete instigation on purpose, which is short of inculpation.

卧底侦查不同于教唆陷害，卧底警察具有不完整的教唆故意，欠缺可罚性。

3.The lawyer argued that the evidence presented was insufficient for any real inculpation 指控 of his client.

律师辩称，提交的证据不足以对他的客户进行任何真正的指控。

4.Her inculpation 指控 of the company's unethical practices led to a major investigation.

她对公司不道德行为的指控导致了一次重大调查。

5.The inculpation 指控 of the suspect was based on circumstantial evidence.

对嫌疑人的指控是基于间接证据。

6.The defense team worked tirelessly to dismantle the inculpation 指控 against their client.

辩护团队不懈努力地拆解对其客户的指控。

7.During the trial, the prosecution's inculpation 指控 relied heavily on witness testimonies.

在审判期间，检方的指控严重依赖于证人的证词。

作文

In the realm of law and justice, the concept of inculpation plays a crucial role in determining an individual's guilt or innocence. The term inculpation refers to the act of accusing someone of a crime or wrongdoing, effectively placing blame on them. Understanding the nuances of inculpation is essential for anyone studying criminal justice or engaging with legal systems. This essay will explore the meaning of inculpation, its implications in legal contexts, and its impact on society at large.To begin with, inculpation is often seen in the context of criminal trials where the prosecution must provide sufficient evidence to support their claims against the defendant. The process of inculpation involves not only presenting evidence but also establishing a narrative that connects the accused to the alleged crime. This can include eyewitness testimonies, forensic evidence, and circumstantial facts that collectively aim to construct a compelling case for guilt.However, it is important to recognize that inculpation does not equate to certainty of guilt. The legal system operates on the principle of 'innocent until proven guilty,' which means that while inculpation may suggest wrongdoing, it is ultimately up to the court to determine the truth. This highlights a fundamental aspect of justice: the necessity of fair trials and the protection of individual rights. Misuse of inculpation can lead to wrongful convictions, which have devastating consequences for individuals and their families.Moreover, the societal implications of inculpation extend beyond the courtroom. When individuals are publicly accused, the stigma associated with inculpation can lead to social ostracism, loss of employment, and damage to personal relationships, even if they are later exonerated. The media often plays a significant role in shaping public perception around inculpation, sometimes leading to a rush to judgment before all the facts are known. This phenomenon raises ethical questions regarding the responsibility of the press and the impact of sensationalism on the lives of those accused.Furthermore, inculpation is not limited to criminal acts; it can also manifest in civil cases where individuals or organizations are held accountable for their actions. In these situations, inculpation may involve allegations of negligence, fraud, or breach of contract. The principles governing inculpation in civil law differ from those in criminal law, yet the underlying theme of attributing responsibility remains consistent.In conclusion, the term inculpation encapsulates a complex interplay of legal, social, and ethical dimensions. It serves as a reminder of the importance of due process and the potential consequences of accusations. As society continues to grapple with issues of justice and accountability, a deeper understanding of inculpation will be vital in ensuring that the rights of individuals are protected while also addressing the need for accountability in our communities. Ultimately, the careful handling of inculpation can contribute to a more just and equitable society, where the truth prevails, and justice is served fairly.

在法律和正义的领域中，inculpation的概念在确定个人的有罪或无罪方面发挥着至关重要的作用。inculpation一词指的是指控某人犯罪或不当行为的行为，有效地将责任归咎于他们。理解inculpation的微妙之处对于任何学习刑事司法或参与法律系统的人来说都是至关重要的。本文将探讨inculpation的含义、其在法律背景下的影响以及对社会的广泛影响。首先，inculpation通常出现在刑事审判的背景中，检方必须提供足够的证据来支持他们对被告的指控。inculpation的过程不仅涉及呈现证据，还包括建立一个将被告与所指控的犯罪联系起来的叙述。这可以包括目击者的证词、法医证据和间接事实，这些都旨在共同构建一个有力的有罪案件。然而，重要的是要认识到，inculpation并不等同于有罪的确定性。法律系统以“无罪推定”的原则运作，这意味着虽然inculpation可能暗示不当行为，但最终由法庭决定真相。这突显了正义的基本方面：公正审判和保护个人权利的必要性。滥用inculpation可能导致错误定罪，这对个人及其家庭产生毁灭性的后果。此外，inculpation的社会影响超出了法庭。当个人被公开指控时，与inculpation相关的污名可能导致社会排斥、失业和个人关系的破裂，即使他们后来被证明无罪。媒体往往在塑造公众对inculpation的看法方面发挥重要作用，有时在所有事实尚未明确之前就急于做出判断。这种现象引发了关于媒体责任和轰动效应对被指控者生活影响的伦理问题。此外，inculpation不仅限于犯罪行为；它也可以在民事案件中表现出来，在这些案件中，个人或组织因其行为而被追究责任。在这些情况下，inculpation可能涉及疏忽、欺诈或违反合同的指控。在民法中，调控inculpation的原则与刑法有所不同，但归属责任的基本主题仍然是一致的。总之，inculpation一词概括了法律、社会和伦理维度之间复杂的相互作用。它提醒我们注意正当程序的重要性以及指控的潜在后果。随着社会继续努力解决正义和问责的问题，对inculpation的更深入理解将对确保个人权利得到保护，同时满足我们社区对问责的需求至关重要。最终，妥善处理inculpation可以促进一个更加公正和公平的社会，在这个社会中，真理得以实现，正义得到公正的伸张。