sweeping hold charges

简明释义

扫舱费

英英释义

例句

1.Due to the new policy, customers will face sweeping hold charges if they do not cancel their reservations in time.

由于新政策，如果客户未能及时取消预订，将面临全面的保留费用。

2.Travel agencies are now notifying clients about sweeping hold charges for late cancellations.

旅行社现在通知客户关于延迟取消的全面的保留费用。

3.In response to no-shows, the restaurant now applies sweeping hold charges for unconfirmed reservations.

为了应对未到场的情况，餐厅现在对未确认的预订收取全面的保留费用。

4.The hotel introduced sweeping hold charges to ensure that guests honor their bookings.

酒店引入了全面的保留费用以确保客人遵守他们的预订。

5.The airline implemented sweeping hold charges to manage the increased demand for flights during the holiday season.

航空公司实施了全面的保留费用以应对假期期间航班需求的增加。

作文

In recent years, the concept of justice has evolved significantly, particularly in the realm of criminal law. One term that has garnered attention is sweeping hold charges, which refers to broad or extensive charges that can be applied to individuals during legal proceedings. These charges often encompass a wide range of offenses, making them particularly controversial in discussions about fairness and due process. The implications of using sweeping hold charges can be profound, affecting not only the accused individuals but also the judicial system as a whole.To understand the impact of sweeping hold charges, it is essential to examine their application in real-world scenarios. For instance, during large-scale protests or riots, law enforcement agencies may resort to sweeping hold charges to detain numerous individuals under the assumption that they were all involved in unlawful activities. This practice raises significant ethical questions, as it often leads to the arrest of innocent people who were merely present at the scene.Critics argue that sweeping hold charges undermine the principle of individual culpability, which is a cornerstone of the justice system. Each person should be held accountable for their actions based on evidence and due process, rather than being swept up in a broad net of accusations. The use of such charges can lead to a culture of fear and mistrust between communities and law enforcement, as people may feel that they could be wrongfully accused at any time.Moreover, the consequences of sweeping hold charges extend beyond the immediate legal ramifications. Individuals who are charged may face social stigma, loss of employment, and emotional distress, even if they are eventually exonerated. The long-term effects can be devastating, leading to a cycle of poverty and disenfranchisement that disproportionately affects marginalized communities.In light of these issues, it is crucial for lawmakers and legal practitioners to reconsider the use of sweeping hold charges. There needs to be a balance between maintaining public order and protecting individual rights. Alternatives to broad charges should be explored, such as targeted investigations that rely on specific evidence rather than generalizations.Furthermore, public awareness and education about the implications of sweeping hold charges are vital. Communities must be informed about their rights and the legal processes that govern their interactions with law enforcement. Advocacy groups can play a key role in this, providing resources and support to those who may find themselves facing unjust charges.In conclusion, while sweeping hold charges may seem like a practical solution for law enforcement in times of crisis, they pose significant risks to the integrity of the justice system. By prioritizing individual accountability and due process, society can work towards a fairer legal framework that respects the rights of all individuals. It is imperative that we critically assess the implications of such charges and strive for a justice system that is equitable and just for everyone.

近年来，正义的概念在刑法领域发生了显著变化。其中一个引起关注的术语是广泛拘留指控，它指的是在法律程序中可以适用于个人的广泛或广泛的指控。这些指控通常涵盖一系列罪行，使其在关于公平和正当程序的讨论中尤为有争议。使用广泛拘留指控的影响可能是深远的，不仅影响被告个人，还影响整个司法系统。要理解广泛拘留指控的影响，有必要检查其在现实场景中的应用。例如，在大规模抗议或骚乱期间，执法机构可能会诉诸于广泛拘留指控，以假定所有在场的人都参与了非法活动，从而拘留大量个体。这种做法引发了重大的伦理问题，因为这往往导致无辜的人被逮捕，而他们只是恰好在现场。批评者认为，广泛拘留指控削弱了个人责任的原则，这是司法系统的基石。每个人都应根据证据和正当程序对自己的行为负责，而不是被笼统的指控所牵连。这种指控的使用可能导致社区与执法之间的恐惧和不信任文化，因为人们可能会觉得他们随时可能被错误指控。此外，广泛拘留指控的后果不仅限于即时的法律后果。被指控的个人可能面临社会污名、失去就业机会和情感困扰，即使他们最终被证明无罪。长期影响可能是毁灭性的，导致贫困和无权状态的循环，这对边缘化社区造成了不成比例的影响。鉴于这些问题，立法者和法律从业者必须重新考虑使用广泛拘留指控。需要在维护公共秩序和保护个人权利之间取得平衡。应探索替代广泛指控的方法，例如依赖特定证据而非概括的针对性调查。此外，公众意识和教育关于广泛拘留指控的影响至关重要。社区必须了解他们的权利以及管理他们与执法互动的法律程序。倡导团体在这方面可以发挥关键作用，为那些可能面临不公正指控的人提供资源和支持。总之，尽管在危机时期，广泛拘留指控似乎是执法的实用解决方案，但它们对司法系统的完整性构成了重大风险。通过优先考虑个人责任和正当程序，社会可以朝着一个更公平的法律框架发展，尊重所有个人的权利。我们必须认真评估此类指控的影响，并努力实现一个对每个人都公平和公正的司法系统。