substantive right

简明释义

实体权利

英英释义

例句

1.The new legislation aims to protect the substantive right 实质权利 of workers to fair wages and safe working conditions.

新立法旨在保护工人获得公平工资和安全工作条件的substantive right 实质权利。

2.Legal experts often discuss how the substantive right 实质权利 to privacy is being challenged in the digital age.

法律专家经常讨论在数字时代如何挑战substantive right 实质权利隐私权的问题。

3.In a divorce case, the court emphasized that both parties have a substantive right 实质权利 to equitable distribution of assets.

在离婚案件中，法院强调双方都有权利公平分配资产，拥有substantive right 实质权利。

4.The plaintiff argued that his substantive right 实质权利 to free speech was violated by the company's policies.

原告辩称公司的政策侵犯了他的substantive right 实质权利，即言论自由。

5.The defendant claimed that his actions were justified under the law, asserting that he had a substantive right 实质权利 to defend himself.

被告声称他的行为在法律下是合理的，并主张他有权利为自己辩护，拥有substantive right 实质权利。

作文

In the realm of law, the concept of a substantive right refers to a fundamental right that is granted to individuals by law. These rights are essential as they form the basis for legal claims and protections within a legal system. Understanding substantive rights is crucial for anyone studying law or engaged in legal practices because they directly affect the lives of individuals and the functioning of society as a whole. For instance, the right to free speech, the right to privacy, and the right to own property are all examples of substantive rights. The significance of substantive rights cannot be overstated. They ensure that individuals have the ability to make choices and take actions that are essential to their dignity and autonomy. Without these rights, individuals would be vulnerable to arbitrary actions by the state or other individuals. For example, if the right to free speech were not recognized as a substantive right, individuals could be punished for expressing their thoughts and opinions, which would stifle public discourse and hinder democracy.Moreover, substantive rights also serve as a foundation for social justice. They provide a framework through which individuals can challenge injustices and seek redress. For instance, if someone believes their substantive rights have been violated, they can pursue legal action to restore their rights. This process not only empowers individuals but also reinforces the rule of law, ensuring that everyone is held accountable for their actions.It is important to note that substantive rights can vary significantly across different jurisdictions. While many countries recognize similar rights, the scope and application of these rights can differ. For instance, the right to education is considered a substantive right in many countries, but the extent to which this right is guaranteed and protected can vary widely. Some nations may provide free education at all levels, while others may have limited access, thus affecting the realization of this substantive right.In addition, the protection of substantive rights often requires active enforcement by governments and judicial systems. Laws must be enacted and upheld to protect these rights from infringement. This can include legislation that explicitly recognizes substantive rights and establishes mechanisms for individuals to seek justice when their rights are violated. For example, anti-discrimination laws are vital in protecting individuals from being denied their substantive rights based on race, gender, or other characteristics.Furthermore, the understanding and interpretation of substantive rights can evolve over time. Societal values and norms change, and as a result, what is considered a substantive right may expand or shift. For instance, issues such as digital privacy and data protection have gained prominence in recent years, leading to discussions about whether these should be recognized as substantive rights. In conclusion, substantive rights are integral to the legal framework that governs society. They empower individuals, promote social justice, and require active protection and enforcement by the state. As society evolves, so too must our understanding and recognition of substantive rights, ensuring that they adapt to new challenges and continue to safeguard individual freedoms. It is imperative for individuals to be aware of their substantive rights and advocate for their protection, as these rights are essential for a free and just society.

在法律领域，实质性权利这个概念是指法律赋予个人的基本权利。这些权利是至关重要的，因为它们构成了法律体系中法律主张和保护的基础。理解实质性权利对于任何学习法律或从事法律实践的人来说都是至关重要的，因为它们直接影响个人的生活和社会的整体运作。例如，言论自由权、隐私权和财产权都是实质性权利的例子。实质性权利的重要性不可低估。它们确保个人有能力做出选择和采取行动，这对他们的尊严和自主性至关重要。如果没有这些权利，个人将容易受到国家或其他个人的任意行为的侵害。例如，如果言论自由权不被视为实质性权利，个人可能会因表达自己的思想和观点而受到惩罚，这将扼杀公共话语并阻碍民主。此外，实质性权利还为社会正义提供了基础框架。它们提供了一种机制，通过该机制，个人可以挑战不公正现象并寻求救济。例如，如果有人认为自己的实质性权利受到侵犯，他们可以追求法律行动以恢复其权利。这个过程不仅赋予个人权力，还加强了法治，确保每个人都对自己的行为负责。需要注意的是，实质性权利在不同的法域之间可能会有显著差异。虽然许多国家承认类似的权利，但这些权利的范围和适用性可能会有所不同。例如，在许多国家，教育权被视为实质性权利，但这一权利的保障和保护程度可能差异很大。一些国家可能在所有层次上提供免费教育，而其他国家的获取途径可能有限，从而影响这一实质性权利的实现。此外，保护实质性权利通常需要政府和司法系统的积极执行。必须制定和实施法律，以保护这些权利免受侵犯。这可以包括明确承认实质性权利的立法，并建立机制，让个人在权利受到侵犯时寻求公正。例如，反歧视法在保护个人不因种族、性别或其他特征而被剥夺其实质性权利方面至关重要。此外，对实质性权利的理解和解释可能随着时间的推移而演变。社会价值观和规范发生变化，因此，被视为实质性权利的内容可能会扩展或转变。例如，数字隐私和数据保护等问题近年来日益突出，引发了关于这些是否应被承认为实质性权利的讨论。总之，实质性权利是治理社会的法律框架中不可或缺的部分。它们赋予个人权力，促进社会正义，并要求国家积极保护和执行。随着社会的发展，我们对实质性权利的理解和承认也必须不断演变，以确保它们能够适应新的挑战，并继续保护个人自由。个人必须意识到自己的实质性权利并倡导其保护，因为这些权利对一个自由和公正的社会至关重要。