exempts

简明释义

英[ɪɡˈzempts]美[ɪɡˈzempts]

豁免

免除

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Its three-wheel design exempts it from onerous federal testing regulations.

它的三轮设计使它不用再受繁杂的联邦机动车测试规定的约束。

2.Unfortunately for the state’s finances, which involve a budget gap of close to $1 billion, state law exempts mines from almost any taxes.

不幸的是由于州财政上出现的将近1亿美金的财政缺口，州法律已经免除了采矿业上的所有税收。

3.Therefore if you really love her, also did not have too to be good to her, exempts has harmed her.

所以如果你真的爱她，也不要对她太好，免的害了她。

4.Nikopol: Secrets of the Immortals The game exempts the compact disc patch Exempts the compact disc the meaning on not ton…

尼科波尔：不朽的秘密游戏的免光盘补丁 免光盘的意思就是不用验证光盘，直接玩。

5.While individuals with increased skin pigmentation have added protection against the UV rays of the sun, it is dangerous to assume that our darker skin exempts us from this serious skin problem.

这是危险的假设，我们的肤色较深的豁免我们从这个严重的皮肤问题。

6.Frontlines: Fuel of War The game exempts the compact disc patch Exempts the compact disc the meaning on not to need to confirm t…

前线之战火之源游戏的免光盘补丁 免光盘的意思就是不用验证光盘，直接玩。

7.The new law exempts small businesses from certain taxes.

新法律免除了小型企业的某些税收。

8.Certain items are exempt from sales tax in our state.

在我们州，某些物品免除了销售税。

9.The program exempts low-income families from paying fees.

该项目免除了低收入家庭的费用。

10.She was exempted from the final exam due to her illness.

由于生病，她被免除了期末考试。

11.Students who maintain a high GPA are exempt from additional coursework.

保持高GPA的学生免除了额外的课程要求。

作文

In today's society, the concept of fairness is often debated, especially when it comes to taxation and legal responsibilities. Many people believe that certain individuals or organizations should be treated differently under the law. This brings us to the term 'exempts', which refers to the act of freeing someone or something from an obligation or rule. For instance, a government might create tax laws that exempts non-profit organizations from paying taxes. This exemption allows these organizations to allocate more resources towards their charitable activities rather than paying taxes. While this practice may seem beneficial, it raises questions about equity among different sectors of society.One argument in favor of such exemptions is that they encourage philanthropy and support for various causes. By exempting non-profits from taxes, governments can incentivize donations and volunteer work, ultimately benefiting the community. For example, a local charity that provides food to the homeless can operate more effectively if it does not have to worry about tax burdens. This can lead to a more vibrant civil society where citizens are more willing to contribute to social causes.On the other hand, critics argue that these exemptions can lead to unfair advantages. When certain groups are exempted from taxes, it places a heavier burden on those who do not qualify for such benefits. For instance, small businesses that do not receive similar tax relief may struggle to compete with larger non-profit organizations that enjoy these privileges. This can create an uneven playing field, where some entities thrive while others are left to fend for themselves.Moreover, the criteria for who gets exempted can sometimes be ambiguous. Different jurisdictions may have varying definitions of what constitutes a non-profit or a charitable organization. This inconsistency can lead to loopholes where organizations manipulate their status to gain tax benefits unfairly. Therefore, it is crucial for lawmakers to establish clear guidelines that determine who qualifies for these exemptions.In addition, the issue of whether to exempt certain sectors from regulations also arises in discussions about environmental protection. Some industries argue that they should be exempted from strict environmental laws to promote economic growth. However, this can lead to significant environmental degradation, which ultimately affects everyone. Striking a balance between economic development and environmental responsibility is essential for sustainable progress.To conclude, the term exempts carries significant weight in discussions about fairness and equality in society. While there are valid reasons for providing exemptions, it is important to consider the broader implications of such actions. Policymakers must carefully evaluate who is exempted and ensure that these decisions do not create disparities or injustice. As we move forward, fostering a fair system that supports both individual initiatives and collective responsibilities will be key to building a just society.

在当今社会，公平的概念常常被辩论，尤其是在税收和法律责任方面。许多人认为，某些个人或组织应该在法律下受到不同的对待。这使我们想到了“exempts”这个词，它指的是将某人或某物从义务或规则中解放出来的行为。例如，政府可能会制定税法，使非营利组织免于缴税。这种豁免使这些组织能够将更多资源用于慈善活动，而不是支付税款。虽然这种做法看起来是有益的，但它引发了关于社会不同部门之间公平性的问题。支持这种豁免的一个论点是，它们鼓励慈善事业和对各种事业的支持。通过免除非营利组织的税收，政府可以激励捐赠和志愿工作，最终使社区受益。例如，一个为无家可归者提供食物的地方慈善机构，如果不必担心税负，可以更有效地运作。这可以导致一个更加活跃的公民社会，公民更愿意为社会事业做出贡献。另一方面，批评者认为，这些豁免可能导致不公平的优势。当某些群体被免于纳税时，这会给那些没有资格享受此类福利的人带来更重的负担。例如，未获得类似税收减免的小企业可能难以与享受这些特权的大型非营利组织竞争。这可能导致一个不平等的竞争环境，一些实体繁荣而其他实体则不得不自谋生路。此外，谁被豁免的问题有时可能模糊不清。不同的司法管辖区可能对什么构成非营利组织或慈善组织有不同的定义。这种不一致可能导致漏洞，一些组织操纵其身份以不公平地获得税收利益。因此，立法者必须建立明确的准则，确定谁符合这些豁免的条件。此外，在关于环境保护的讨论中，是否应豁免某些行业的法规问题也会出现。一些行业认为，他们应该免于严格的环境法律，以促进经济增长。然而，这可能导致严重的环境退化，最终影响到每个人。在经济发展与环境责任之间找到平衡对于可持续发展至关重要。总之，术语“exempts”在关于社会公平和平等的讨论中具有重要意义。虽然提供豁免有其合理理由，但考虑此类行为的更广泛影响也很重要。政策制定者必须仔细评估谁被豁免，并确保这些决定不会造成不平等或不公正。随着我们向前发展，促进一个支持个人倡议和集体责任的公平系统将是建设公正社会的关键。