strike clause

简明释义

罢工条款(提单

英英释义

例句

1.Our legal team recommended revising the strike clause to ensure it complies with labor laws.

我们的法律团队建议修订罢工条款以确保其符合劳动法。

2.During negotiations, they decided to add a strike clause to protect against unforeseen circumstances.

在谈判过程中，他们决定添加一条罢工条款以防范不可预见的情况。

3.If the company fails to meet its obligations, the employees can activate the strike clause.

如果公司未能履行其义务，员工可以激活罢工条款。

4.The contract included a strike clause that allowed either party to terminate the agreement under specific conditions.

合同中包含了一条罢工条款，允许任何一方在特定条件下终止协议。

5.The strike clause was invoked when the workers demanded better wages and working conditions.

当工人们要求更好的工资和工作条件时，罢工条款被启动。

作文

In the realm of contract law and negotiations, the term strike clause refers to a specific provision that allows one party to remove or nullify certain terms from an agreement. This can be particularly important in various business dealings, where parties may wish to negotiate terms that are more favorable to their interests. The ability to strike clause can empower negotiators, providing them with leverage to amend agreements without having to completely renegotiate the entire contract.The significance of a strike clause becomes evident in situations where a particular clause within a contract is deemed unfavorable or unnecessary by one of the parties involved. For instance, if a company is entering into a partnership agreement, they may encounter a clause that imposes excessive penalties for non-compliance. In such cases, the company might seek to strike clause to avoid potential financial burdens in the future.Moreover, the process of negotiating a strike clause can lead to more transparent and collaborative discussions between parties. When both sides are open to modifying certain terms, it fosters an environment where mutual understanding and respect can flourish. This is particularly crucial in long-term partnerships, where maintaining a positive relationship is essential for ongoing success.However, the use of strike clause is not without its challenges. One of the main issues arises when parties have differing interpretations of what constitutes a reasonable amendment. For example, one party may view a particular term as standard practice, while the other sees it as an unreasonable demand. This discrepancy can lead to disputes and hinder the negotiation process.Additionally, there is a risk that the frequent use of strike clause could lead to an erosion of trust between negotiating parties. If one side is perceived as constantly seeking to strike clause critical terms, the other may feel that they are being taken advantage of, which could damage the relationship irreparably.To navigate these complexities, it is essential for parties to approach negotiations with a clear understanding of their objectives and the implications of strike clause usage. Establishing a framework for discussions, where both parties can express their concerns and preferences, can help mitigate misunderstandings. Transparency in communication is vital; when parties openly discuss their reasons for wanting to strike clause, it can lead to more amicable resolutions.In conclusion, the strike clause serves as a powerful tool in contract negotiations, enabling parties to tailor agreements to better fit their needs. While it offers significant advantages in terms of flexibility and adaptability, it also requires careful consideration and mutual respect to ensure that the negotiation process remains constructive. By fostering open dialogue and understanding, parties can effectively utilize the strike clause to create agreements that benefit all involved, ultimately leading to more successful and sustainable partnerships in the long run.

在合同法和谈判领域，术语strike clause指的是一项特定条款，允许一方从协议中删除或废除某些条款。这在各种商业交易中尤为重要，因为各方可能希望谈判出更有利于自身利益的条款。能够使用strike clause可以赋予谈判者权力，使他们能够在不必完全重新谈判整个合同的情况下修改协议。strike clause的重要性在于，当合同中的某一条款被其中一方认为不利或不必要时，这种情况变得显而易见。例如，如果一家公司正在签订合作协议，他们可能会遇到一条对不合规行为施加过高罚款的条款。在这种情况下，该公司可能会寻求删除该条款，以避免未来可能的财务负担。此外，谈判strike clause的过程可以促使双方之间更加透明和协作的讨论。当双方都愿意修改某些条款时，这种做法有助于营造一个相互理解和尊重的氛围。这在长期合作关系中特别重要，因为维持良好的关系对于持续的成功至关重要。然而，使用strike clause并非没有挑战。主要问题之一是当各方对合理修改的定义存在不同解读时。例如，一方可能将某一特定条款视为标准做法，而另一方则认为这是不合理的要求。这种差异可能导致争议并阻碍谈判进程。此外，频繁使用strike clause可能会导致谈判各方之间的信任逐渐侵蚀。如果一方被视为不断试图删除关键条款，另一方可能会感到自己被占便宜，这可能会对关系造成不可挽回的损害。为了应对这些复杂性，各方必须以清晰的目标和对strike clause使用影响的理解来进行谈判。建立讨论框架，让双方表达自己的担忧和偏好，可以帮助减少误解。沟通的透明度至关重要；当各方公开讨论他们想要strike clause的理由时，可能会导致更友好的解决方案。总之，strike clause作为合同谈判中的一种强大工具，使各方能够根据自身需要量身定制协议。虽然它在灵活性和适应性方面提供了显著优势，但也需要谨慎考虑和相互尊重，以确保谈判过程保持建设性。通过促进开放对话和理解，各方可以有效利用strike clause来创建对所有相关方都有利的协议，最终促进更成功和可持续的长期合作关系。