summary action

简明释义

即决诉讼

英英释义

例句

1.The board's decision was to implement a summary action 总结性措施 to cut costs immediately.

董事会的决定是立即实施总结性措施 summary action来削减成本。

2.After reviewing the evidence, the committee took summary action 总结性措施 to ensure compliance with regulations.

在审查证据后，委员会采取了总结性措施 summary action以确保遵守规定。

3.The manager decided to take a summary action 总结性措施 to address the team's performance issues.

经理决定采取一个总结性措施 summary action来解决团队的表现问题。

4.In cases of misconduct, the school may implement a summary action 总结性措施 against the offending student.

在不当行为的情况下，学校可能会对违规学生实施总结性措施 summary action。

5.The legal team recommended a summary action 总结性措施 to expedite the resolution of the dispute.

法律团队建议采取总结性措施 summary action以加快争议的解决。

作文

In the realm of law and governance, the term summary action refers to a legal process that allows for a swift resolution of a case without the need for a lengthy trial. This procedural mechanism is designed to expedite the judicial process, ensuring that justice can be delivered in a timely manner. A summary action typically occurs when the facts of a case are clear and undisputed, allowing the court to make a decision based on the evidence presented without the need for extensive witness testimony or elaborate arguments from both sides.The importance of summary action cannot be overstated. In many instances, individuals or entities involved in legal disputes may seek this expedited process to avoid the high costs and prolonged timelines associated with traditional litigation. For example, in civil cases where the amount of damages claimed is relatively small, parties may prefer to pursue a summary action to resolve their issues quickly and efficiently.Moreover, summary action serves a crucial role in maintaining the efficiency of the legal system. Courts are often inundated with a backlog of cases, and allowing for summary actions helps to alleviate some of this pressure. By enabling judges to resolve straightforward matters swiftly, the judicial system can focus its resources on more complex cases that require a full trial. This not only benefits the courts but also enhances access to justice for individuals who may otherwise be deterred by the complexities and costs of traditional legal proceedings.However, while summary action offers many advantages, it is not without its limitations. One significant drawback is that it may not be suitable for all types of cases. In situations where the facts are disputed or where there are substantial legal questions to consider, a full trial may be necessary to ensure that all parties receive a fair hearing. Additionally, the criteria for initiating a summary action can vary by jurisdiction, which may lead to inconsistencies in how these cases are handled across different courts.In conclusion, the concept of summary action represents a vital component of the legal landscape, providing a mechanism for swift and efficient resolutions in certain types of cases. While it is essential to recognize the benefits of this process, it is equally important to understand its limitations. As society continues to evolve and the legal system adapts to new challenges, the role of summary action will likely remain an important topic of discussion among legal professionals and scholars alike. Ultimately, the goal should always be to balance efficiency with fairness, ensuring that justice is served in a manner that respects the rights and needs of all parties involved.

在法律和治理的领域中，术语summary action指的是一种法律程序，允许在不需要漫长审判的情况下迅速解决案件。这一程序机制旨在加快司法进程，确保公正能够及时交付。summary action通常发生在案件事实清晰且无争议的情况下，法院可以根据提出的证据做出裁决，而无需广泛的证人证言或双方的详细辩论。summary action的重要性不容小觑。在许多情况下，涉及法律争议的个人或实体可能会寻求这种加快的程序，以避免与传统诉讼相关的高昂费用和漫长时间。例如，在索赔金额相对较小的民事案件中，各方可能更愿意追求summary action以快速有效地解决他们的问题。此外，summary action在维护法律系统效率方面发挥着至关重要的作用。法院常常面临案件积压的压力，允许进行简易诉讼有助于缓解这种压力。通过使法官能够迅速解决简单事项，司法系统可以将资源集中在需要全面审判的复杂案件上。这不仅有利于法院，也增强了普通人获得公正的机会，因为他们可能会因传统法律程序的复杂性和成本而感到畏惧。然而，尽管summary action提供了许多优势，但它并非没有局限性。一个显著的缺点是，它可能并不适合所有类型的案件。在事实存在争议或存在重大法律问题需要考虑的情况下，可能需要全面审判以确保所有各方都能获得公正的听证。此外，启动summary action的标准可能因管辖区而异，这可能导致不同法院在处理这些案件时的不一致性。总之，summary action的概念代表了法律领域的重要组成部分，为某些类型案件提供了迅速和有效解决的机制。虽然必须认识到这一过程的好处，但同样重要的是要理解其局限性。随着社会的不断发展，法律系统也在适应新的挑战，summary action的角色可能仍将是法律专业人士和学者讨论的重要话题。最终，目标应该始终是在效率与公平之间取得平衡，确保以尊重所有相关方权利和需求的方式实现公正。