system of common law

简明释义

普通法系

英英释义

A legal system based on judicial precedents and customs rather than written statutes, where the decisions made by higher courts are binding on lower courts.

一种基于司法判例和习惯而非成文法的法律体系,其中高等法院的裁决对低等法院具有约束力。

例句

1.Many countries, including Canada and Australia, have adopted a system of common law inherited from the British legal tradition.

许多国家,包括加拿大和澳大利亚,采纳了源自英国法律传统的普通法体系

2.The United States operates under a system of common law, which is based on judicial decisions and precedents.

美国采用的法律体系是普通法体系,其基础是法官的裁决和判例。

3.Contract law is largely governed by the system of common law, which emphasizes the importance of precedent.

合同法主要受普通法体系的管辖,该体系强调先例的重要性。

4.The system of common law allows for flexibility and adaptability as it evolves with societal changes.

由于随着社会变化而演变,普通法体系允许灵活性和适应性。

5.In a system of common law, judges play a crucial role in interpreting laws and setting legal precedents.

普通法体系中,法官在解释法律和设定法律先例方面发挥着至关重要的作用。

作文

The system of common law has a profound impact on the legal frameworks of many countries around the world, particularly those that were once part of the British Empire. This legal system is characterized by its reliance on case law, which is established by the outcomes of previous court cases. Unlike civil law systems that are primarily based on codified statutes, the system of common law evolves through judicial decisions and interpretations. This makes it a dynamic and adaptable legal framework that can respond to changing societal needs and values.One of the key features of the system of common law is the principle of precedent, or 'stare decisis'. This means that lower courts are bound to follow the legal principles established in higher court decisions. As a result, the consistency and predictability of the law are maintained, allowing individuals and businesses to make informed decisions based on established legal precedents. For instance, if a higher court rules on a particular issue, lower courts must apply that ruling in similar cases unless there is a compelling reason to deviate from it.The adaptability of the system of common law is particularly evident in its ability to incorporate new social norms and values. Judges play a crucial role in this process, as they interpret laws and apply them to unique cases. Through their rulings, judges can effectively shape the law to reflect contemporary issues. For example, in recent years, many common law jurisdictions have seen significant developments in areas such as privacy rights and intellectual property, often driven by technological advancements and changing public perceptions.However, the system of common law is not without its criticisms. Some argue that it can lead to unpredictability, as different judges may interpret laws in varying ways, leading to inconsistent outcomes. Additionally, the reliance on case law can sometimes result in a slow evolution of legal principles, as changes may only occur through lengthy court battles. Critics also point out that the system of common law may favor those with greater resources, as they can afford to engage in protracted legal disputes.Despite these challenges, the system of common law remains a vital component of many legal systems. Its emphasis on judicial interpretation allows for a flexible approach to law that can adapt to societal changes. Moreover, the use of precedents ensures that individuals have a degree of certainty regarding their legal rights and obligations. In an increasingly complex world, where legislation can struggle to keep pace with rapid change, the system of common law provides a mechanism for the law to evolve organically.In conclusion, the system of common law is a unique and influential legal framework that has shaped the legal landscape of numerous countries. Its reliance on judicial decisions and the principle of precedent create a system that is both adaptable and consistent. While it faces certain criticisms, the system of common law continues to thrive, demonstrating its resilience and relevance in today's society. Understanding this system is essential for anyone looking to navigate the complexities of law and justice in common law jurisdictions.

普通法体系对世界许多国家的法律框架产生了深远的影响,特别是那些曾经属于大英帝国的国家。该法律体系的特点在于它依赖于判例法,这些判例法是由先前法院案件的结果建立的。与主要基于成文法典的民法体系不同,普通法体系通过司法判决和解释不断发展。这使得它成为一个动态和适应性强的法律框架,能够响应不断变化的社会需求和价值观。普通法体系的一个关键特征是先例原则或“遵循先例”。这意味着下级法院必须遵循高等法院裁定所确立的法律原则。因此,法律的一致性和可预测性得以维持,使个人和企业能够根据既定的法律先例做出明智的决策。例如,如果高等法院对某一问题作出裁定,下级法院必须在类似案件中适用该裁定,除非有令人信服的理由偏离这一裁定。普通法体系的适应性在其纳入新社会规范和价值观的能力上尤为明显。法官在这一过程中发挥着至关重要的作用,因为他们解释法律并将其应用于独特的案件。通过他们的裁决,法官可以有效地塑造法律,以反映当代问题。例如,近年来,许多普通法管辖区在隐私权和知识产权等领域发生了重大进展,这往往是由技术进步和公众认知的变化推动的。然而,普通法体系并非没有批评。一些人认为,由于不同的法官可能以不同的方式解释法律,这可能导致不可预测性,从而导致不一致的结果。此外,依赖判例法有时会导致法律原则的缓慢演变,因为变化可能仅通过漫长的法庭斗争发生。批评者还指出,普通法体系可能偏向资源更丰富的人,因为他们能够承担长期的法律争议。尽管面临这些挑战,普通法体系仍然是许多法律体系的重要组成部分。它对司法解释的重视允许对法律采取灵活的方法,能够适应社会变化。此外,使用先例确保个人对其法律权利和义务具有一定程度的确定性。在一个日益复杂的世界中,立法往往难以跟上快速变化的步伐,普通法体系提供了一种法律有机发展的机制。总之,普通法体系是一个独特而有影响力的法律框架,塑造了许多国家的法律格局。它对司法判决和先例原则的依赖创造了一个既适应又一致的体系。尽管面临某些批评,普通法体系继续蓬勃发展,证明了其在当今社会中的韧性和相关性。理解这一体系对于任何希望在普通法管辖区内驾驭法律和正义复杂性的人来说都是必不可少的。