sophistical

简明释义

英[səˈfɪstɪk(ə)l]美[səˈfɪstɪk(ə)l]

adj. 诡辩的；强词夺理的；诡辩法的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.A typical one is its pictorial characteristic that utilizes advanced computer graphical capabilities and so bypasses quite a lot of sophistical mathematical analysis.

频域方法相比传统的时域方法具有一定优势，利用图示方法避开了复杂的数学计算和分析。

2.A typical one is its pictorial characteristic that utilizes advanced computer graphical capabilities and so bypasses quite a lot of sophistical mathematical analysis.

频域方法相比传统的时域方法具有一定优势，利用图示方法避开了复杂的数学计算和分析。

3.The lawyer presented a sophistical argument that seemed convincing but lacked real substance.

律师提出了一个诡辩的论点，听起来令人信服，但实际上缺乏真正的实质。

4.During the debate, she used sophistical reasoning to distract from the main issue.

在辩论中，她使用了诡辩的推理来转移对主要问题的注意。

5.His sophistical claims about the effectiveness of the product were quickly debunked by experts.

他关于该产品有效性的诡辩的说法很快被专家揭穿。

6.Many political speeches are filled with sophistical rhetoric that appeals to emotions rather than logic.

许多政治演讲充满了诡辩的修辞，诉诸于情感而非逻辑。

7.The professor warned his students against using sophistical arguments in their essays.

教授警告学生在论文中不要使用诡辩的论据。

作文

In today's world, where information is abundant and opinions are diverse, the ability to discern between sound reasoning and misleading arguments is crucial. One concept that often arises in discussions about logic and rhetoric is the term sophistical, which refers to reasoning that appears clever but is actually misleading or fallacious. Understanding this term can help individuals navigate complex discussions and make informed decisions. The origins of the word sophistical can be traced back to the Sophists of ancient Greece, who were known for their skill in persuasive speaking and argumentation. While they were admired for their eloquence, they were also criticized for their tendency to prioritize winning arguments over seeking the truth. This duality is essential to grasp when considering the implications of sophistical reasoning in contemporary discourse. For instance, in political debates, candidates often employ sophistical arguments to sway public opinion. They may use emotionally charged language, cherry-pick data, or create false dilemmas to present their case in a favorable light. These tactics can be effective in the short term, but they ultimately undermine the integrity of the discussion. Voters who fall prey to sophistical reasoning may make choices based on flawed logic rather than informed judgment. Moreover, the rise of social media has amplified the prevalence of sophistical arguments. With the rapid spread of information online, individuals are often exposed to misleading claims that masquerade as truth. Misinformation can spread like wildfire, leading people to adopt beliefs that are not grounded in fact. The challenge lies in developing critical thinking skills that allow us to identify sophistical reasoning and question the validity of the arguments presented to us. Education plays a vital role in combating sophistical reasoning. By teaching students how to analyze arguments, recognize logical fallacies, and differentiate between valid and invalid reasoning, we can equip them with the tools necessary to engage thoughtfully in discussions. Encouraging open dialogue and fostering an environment where questioning is welcomed can also help individuals become more discerning consumers of information. In conclusion, the term sophistical encapsulates a significant challenge in our modern age. As we navigate a landscape filled with persuasive arguments and competing narratives, it is essential to cultivate our ability to think critically and recognize when reasoning is misleading. By doing so, we can foster more productive conversations and make choices that are informed by truth rather than deception. Ultimately, understanding the nature of sophistical reasoning empowers us to engage more meaningfully with the world around us.

在当今这个信息丰富、观点多样的世界里，辨别合理推理与误导性论证之间的能力至关重要。一个常常在逻辑和修辞讨论中出现的概念是sophistical一词，它指的是看似聪明但实际上具有误导性或谬误的推理。理解这个术语可以帮助个人在复杂的讨论中导航并做出明智的决定。 sophistical一词的起源可以追溯到古希腊的智者，他们以其在说服性演讲和论证方面的技巧而闻名。虽然他们因其雄辩而受到赞赏，但也因其优先考虑胜利而非寻求真理而受到批评。这种二元性在考虑当代话语中sophistical推理的影响时至关重要。 例如，在政治辩论中，候选人经常使用sophistical论据来影响公众舆论。他们可能会使用情感充沛的语言、选择性引用数据或制造虚假两难，以使自己的立场看起来更有利。这些策略在短期内可能有效，但最终会破坏讨论的完整性。那些受到sophistical推理影响的选民可能会基于错误的逻辑而非明智的判断做出选择。 此外，社交媒体的兴起加剧了sophistical论证的普遍性。随着在线信息的快速传播，个人往往会接触到伪装成真相的误导性主张。错误信息像野火一样传播，导致人们接受没有事实依据的信念。挑战在于培养批判性思维能力，使我们能够识别sophistical推理，并质疑呈现给我们的论点的有效性。 教育在对抗sophistical推理方面发挥着至关重要的作用。通过教导学生如何分析论点、识别逻辑谬误以及区分有效和无效的推理，我们可以为他们提供必要的工具，使他们能够在讨论中进行深思熟虑的参与。鼓励开放对话并营造一个欢迎质疑的环境，也可以帮助个人成为更具鉴别力的信息消费者。 总之，sophistical一词概括了我们现代时代面临的重要挑战。当我们在充满说服性论证和竞争叙述的环境中导航时，培养批判性思维能力并识别何时推理具有误导性是至关重要的。通过这样做，我们可以促进更富有成效的对话，并做出基于真相而非欺骗的选择。最终，理解sophistical推理的本质赋予我们与周围世界更有意义的互动能力。