legalists

简明释义

英[ˈliːɡəlɪsts]美[ˈliɡəlɪsts]

法家

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.As a famous representative person of Legalists in the period of War state, Shang Yang was a distinguished statesmen and jurist from the new emerging landlord class.

商鞅是战国时期的著名法家代表人物，是新兴地主阶级的一位杰出的政治家与法学家。

2.Han Fei is the main representative of the Pre-Qin Legalists.

韩非是先秦法家的主要代表。

3.The Legalists' severe punishment thoughts has its special logic.

法家有其独特的重刑思想的逻辑。

4.There were four main distinct schools which were the Ru, Mohist, Daoist, and Legalists.

有四个不同的学校，主要是茹，墨家，道家，法家。

5.Ancient Chinese philosophy can solve the drawbacks of modern depravity and corruption, Legalists rule the world, military army, Taoism purification of the mind.

中国古代的哲学思想能够解决现代人堕落腐化的弊端，法家治天下，兵家治军，道家净化心灵。

6.The fourth chapter: mainly discussing the limitation of Hanfei Zi's thought and New Legalists in modern Japan transforming and exceeding this limitation, considering Chinese history and actuality;

第四章：着重探讨韩非思想的局限性以及日本近世新法家对韩非思想的近代转换和超越，以此反思中国的历史和现状；

7.Many scholars in China have been interested in the relationship between Han Fei, Legalists and Taoism.

韩非、法家的思想与道家之间的关系，历来受到学人的关注。

8.The fourth chapter: mainly discussing the limitation of Hanfei Zi's thought and New Legalists in modern Japan transforming and exceeding this limitation, considering Chinese history and actuality;

第四章：着重探讨韩非思想的局限性以及日本近世新法家对韩非思想的近代转换和超越，以此反思中国的历史和现状；

9.Both the controlling Confucian school and Legalists and the Taoist school that influence Chinese traditional culture a lot pursued an ideal of non-litigation.

不管是长期占据正统的儒家，还是对中国传统文化有较大影响的法家和道家，都追求一种“无讼”的理想境界。

10.The legalists argue that laws should be applied uniformly without exceptions.

法律主义者legalists主张法律应当一视同仁地适用，而不应有例外。

11.In ancient China, legalists believed that strict laws were necessary for social order.

在古代中国，法律主义者legalists认为严格的法律对于社会秩序是必要的。

12.The debate between the legalists and the moralists continues to shape our understanding of law.

法律主义者legalists与道德主义者的辩论继续影响我们对法律的理解。

13.Critics of the legalists say that their approach ignores the human element of justice.

法律主义者legalists的批评者表示，他们的做法忽视了正义的人性元素。

14.Many modern politicians are criticized for being legalists rather than focusing on ethical governance.

许多现代政治家因过于关注法律条款而被批评为法律主义者legalists，而非专注于道德治理。

作文

Throughout history, various philosophies and ideologies have shaped societies and influenced the way people think and act. One such ideology is that of the legalists, or in Chinese, 法家 (fǎ jiā). This school of thought emerged during the Warring States period in ancient China and was characterized by its emphasis on strict laws and regulations as the foundation for social order. The legalists believed that human nature is inherently selfish and that only through a system of harsh laws and severe punishments could society be maintained. They argued that moral persuasion was ineffective and that the threat of punishment was necessary to ensure compliance with societal norms.The most notable figure associated with legalism is Han Feizi, a philosopher who articulated the principles of this ideology in his writings. Han Feizi argued that rulers should focus on establishing clear laws and enforcing them rigorously. He believed that rewards and punishments should be clearly defined so that individuals would understand the consequences of their actions. This perspective starkly contrasts with other philosophical schools, such as Confucianism, which emphasizes morality and virtue as guiding principles for governance.In examining the role of legalists in shaping Chinese governance, it is essential to recognize the impact of their ideas on the Qin Dynasty. The first emperor of China, Qin Shi Huang, adopted many legalist principles in his rule. He implemented a centralized bureaucratic system, standardized weights and measures, and enforced strict laws across the empire. While these measures contributed to the unification of China, they also led to widespread fear and resentment among the populace due to the harshness of the laws.The legacy of legalists extends beyond ancient China. Their emphasis on law and order can be seen in modern legal systems around the world. The concept that laws should be clear, consistent, and enforced without bias is a fundamental principle in contemporary jurisprudence. However, the challenge lies in balancing the need for order with the protection of individual rights and freedoms. While legalists advocated for strict adherence to laws, modern societies strive to ensure that laws are just and equitable.Moreover, the legalist approach raises important questions about governance and authority. In a world where laws can sometimes be used to oppress rather than protect, it is crucial to critically assess the implications of a purely legalistic framework. The potential for abuse of power exists when rulers prioritize control over compassion, leading to a society marked by fear rather than trust.In conclusion, the philosophy of the legalists has played a significant role in the development of legal thought and governance. While their ideas were rooted in the historical context of ancient China, the principles they espoused continue to resonate in contemporary discussions about law and order. As we navigate the complexities of modern society, it is essential to learn from the lessons of the past, ensuring that the pursuit of order does not come at the expense of justice and humanity. By understanding the contributions and limitations of legalists, we can work towards a more balanced approach to governance that honors both the rule of law and the dignity of individuals.

纵观历史，各种哲学和意识形态塑造了社会，并影响了人们的思维和行为。其中一种意识形态就是法家，或称为法律主义。这个思想流派出现在中国古代的战国时期，以强调严格的法律和规章作为社会秩序的基础而闻名。法家认为，人性本恶，只有通过严厉的法律和惩罚制度才能维持社会的稳定。他们主张道德劝说无效，必须通过惩罚的威胁来确保遵守社会规范。与法家相关的最著名人物是韩非子，他在著作中阐述了这一意识形态的原则。韩非子认为，统治者应专注于建立明确的法律并严格执行。他认为，奖惩应明确界定，以便个人理解其行为的后果。这一观点与其他哲学流派，如儒家，形成鲜明对比，后者强调道德和美德作为治理的指导原则。在考察法家在中国治理中所起的作用时，必须认识到他们思想对秦朝的影响。中国的第一位皇帝秦始皇在统治中采纳了许多法家的原则。他实施了中央集权的官僚制度，统一了度量衡，并在整个帝国施行严格的法律。尽管这些措施有助于中国的统一，但由于法律的严酷性，也导致了民众的广泛恐惧和怨恨。法家的遗产超越了古代中国。他们对法律和秩序的强调可以在当今世界现代法律体系中看到。法律应当清晰、一致并公正执行的理念是当代法理学的基本原则。然而，挑战在于平衡维护秩序与保护个人权利和自由之间的关系。虽然法家主张严格遵守法律，但现代社会努力确保法律公正和平等。此外，法家的方法引发了关于治理和权威的重要问题。在一个法律有时可能被用来压迫而不是保护的世界中，批判性地评估纯法律框架的影响至关重要。当统治者优先考虑控制而非同情时，滥用权力的潜力就存在，从而导致一个以恐惧而非信任为特征的社会。总之，法家的哲学在法律思想和治理的发展中发挥了重要作用。尽管他们的思想根植于古代中国的历史背景，但他们所倡导的原则在当代关于法律和秩序的讨论中仍然引起共鸣。在我们应对现代社会的复杂性时，学习过去的教训至关重要，以确保追求秩序不以牺牲正义和人性为代价。通过理解法家的贡献和局限性，我们可以朝着更平衡的治理方式迈进，既尊重法治，又维护个体的尊严。