adjudicatory

简明释义

英[/əˈdʒudɪˌkeɪtəri/]美[/əˈdʒudɪˌkeɪtəri/]

审判的

宣告的

裁决的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.To reconstruct the criminal adjudicatory supervision procedure, fairness and efficiency should be laid equal stress on and the value conflicts between them should be coordinated.

刑事再审程序的重构应当体现公正与效率的并重，协调两种价值之间的冲突。

2.To reconstruct the criminal adjudicatory supervision procedure, fairness and efficiency should be laid equal stress on and the value conflicts between them should be coordinated.

刑事再审程序的重构应当体现公正与效率的并重，协调两种价值之间的冲突。

3.We need to improve the advice system of the adjudicatory personnel list so that litigants and agents can exercise the rights of withdrawal of appearance.

以书面送达提前告知取代公告通知庭审人员名单，以完善通知审判人员名单制度，使当事人及代理人有效行使申请回避权利；

4.An adjudicatory 裁决的 hearing can take place in various legal contexts, including family law and criminal law.

在家庭法和刑法等各种法律背景下，可以进行裁决的听证会。

5.In administrative law, the adjudicatory 裁决的 process ensures fair hearings for all parties involved.

在行政法中，裁决的程序确保所有相关方都能获得公平的听证。

6.The court held an adjudicatory 裁决的 hearing to determine the outcome of the case.

法庭举行了一次裁决的听证会，以决定案件的结果。

7.The adjudicatory 裁决的 body is responsible for making final decisions on disputes.

该裁决的机构负责对争议做出最终决定。

8.The adjudicatory 裁决的 process often involves the presentation of evidence and witness testimonies.

该裁决的过程通常涉及证据和证人证词的呈现。

作文

In the realm of law and governance, the term adjudicatory refers to processes or functions that involve the formal judgment of disputes. These processes are crucial for maintaining order and ensuring justice within a society. The role of adjudicatory bodies is to interpret laws and apply them to specific cases, thereby resolving conflicts between parties. This essay will explore the significance of adjudicatory mechanisms in legal systems, their impact on society, and the importance of fairness in these processes.To begin with, adjudicatory processes are essential for upholding the rule of law. When individuals or organizations have disagreements, they often seek resolution through legal means. Courts and tribunals serve as adjudicatory entities that evaluate evidence, hear testimonies, and make decisions based on established laws. For instance, in a civil case where one party sues another for breach of contract, the court acts as the adjudicatory body that assesses the validity of the claims and determines the appropriate remedy. Without such mechanisms, disputes could escalate into chaos, leading to a breakdown of social order.Moreover, the adjudicatory process plays a vital role in protecting individual rights. In democratic societies, the judiciary is often seen as a guardian of rights and liberties. When a person's rights are infringed upon, they can turn to an adjudicatory body for redress. For example, in cases of discrimination or wrongful termination, courts provide a platform for individuals to present their cases and seek justice. The ability to appeal to an adjudicatory authority ensures that power is balanced and that individuals are not subjected to arbitrary treatment.However, the effectiveness of adjudicatory processes hinges on their fairness and impartiality. It is crucial that judges and adjudicators remain unbiased and make decisions based solely on the facts presented and the applicable law. Any perception of bias can undermine public confidence in the legal system. Therefore, many jurisdictions have implemented measures to promote transparency and accountability within adjudicatory bodies. This includes allowing for appeals to higher courts and establishing independent oversight committees to review decisions.Another important aspect of adjudicatory mechanisms is their adaptability to societal changes. As societies evolve, so too do their legal frameworks. New laws may be enacted to address emerging issues, such as technology-related disputes or environmental concerns. Adjudicatory bodies must be equipped to interpret and apply these new laws effectively. For instance, in cases involving cybercrime, courts need to understand the technological nuances to make informed decisions. This adaptability ensures that the adjudicatory process remains relevant and effective in addressing contemporary challenges.In conclusion, adjudicatory processes are fundamental to the functioning of legal systems and the protection of individual rights. They provide a structured means of resolving disputes and uphold the rule of law in society. However, the integrity of these processes is paramount; fairness and impartiality must be maintained to foster public trust. As societies continue to evolve, adjudicatory bodies must also adapt to meet new challenges, ensuring that justice remains accessible and effective for all individuals. Ultimately, the importance of adjudicatory mechanisms cannot be overstated, as they are integral to the pursuit of justice and the maintenance of social order.

在法律和治理的领域中，术语adjudicatory指的是涉及正式判断争议的过程或功能。这些过程对于维护秩序和确保社会公正至关重要。裁决机构的角色是解释法律并将其应用于具体案件，从而解决当事方之间的冲突。本文将探讨adjudicatory机制在法律体系中的重要性，它们对社会的影响，以及在这些过程中公平的重要性。首先，adjudicatory过程对于维护法治至关重要。当个人或组织之间存在分歧时，他们通常会寻求通过法律手段解决问题。法院和法庭作为adjudicatory实体，评估证据、听取证词，并根据既定法律作出决定。例如，在一起民事案件中，一方因违反合同起诉另一方，法院作为adjudicatory机构评估索赔的有效性并确定适当的补救措施。如果没有这样的机制，争端可能会升级为混乱，导致社会秩序的崩溃。此外，adjudicatory过程在保护个人权利方面发挥着重要作用。在民主社会中，司法机构通常被视为权利和自由的守护者。当一个人的权利受到侵犯时，他们可以向adjudicatory机构寻求救济。例如，在歧视或不当解雇的案件中，法院为个人提供了一个展示其案件并寻求公正的平台。能够向adjudicatory权威提出上诉，确保了权力的平衡，防止个人遭受任意对待。然而，adjudicatory过程的有效性依赖于其公平性和公正性。法官和裁判员必须保持公正，基于所呈现的事实和适用的法律做出决定。任何偏见的印象都可能破坏公众对法律系统的信心。因此，许多司法管辖区实施了促进adjudicatory机构透明度和问责制的措施。这包括允许对高等法院的上诉以及建立独立的监督委员会来审查决定。Adjudicatory机制的另一个重要方面是其适应社会变化的能力。随着社会的发展，法律框架也在不断演变。新的法律可能会被制定以解决新出现的问题，例如与技术相关的争议或环境问题。Adjudicatory机构必须具备有效解释和应用这些新法律的能力。例如，在涉及网络犯罪的案件中，法院需要理解技术细节，以便做出明智的决定。这种适应性确保了adjudicatory过程在应对当代挑战时保持相关性和有效性。总之，adjudicatory过程是法律体系运作和保护个人权利的基础。它们提供了一种结构化的方式来解决争端，并维护社会的法治。然而，这些过程的完整性至关重要；必须保持公平和公正，以促进公众信任。随着社会的不断发展，adjudicatory机构也必须适应新的挑战，确保正义对所有人都可及且有效。最终，adjudicatory机制的重要性不容小觑，因为它们是追求正义和维护社会秩序的不可或缺的一部分。