polemize

简明释义

英[ˈpɒl.ɪ.maɪz]美[ˈpoʊ.ləˌmaɪz]

v. 争论；辩论

第 三 人 称 单 数 p o l e m i z e s

现 在 分 词 p o l e m i z i n g

过 去 式 p o l e m i z e d

过 去 分 词 p o l e m i z e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The politician tends to polemize 争论 with his opponents during debates.

这位政治家在辩论中倾向于与对手进行争论。

2.The two scholars began to polemize 争论 over the interpretation of ancient texts.

这两位学者开始对古代文本的解释进行争论。

3.In her article, she chose to polemize 辩论 against the popular opinion on climate change.

在她的文章中，她选择对气候变化的普遍观点进行辩论。

4.He loves to polemize 争论 on social media about various controversial issues.

他喜欢在社交媒体上对各种争议问题进行争论。

5.Critics often polemize 争论 about the merits of modern art versus classical art.

批评家们常常对现代艺术与古典艺术的优点进行争论。

作文

In today's society, the ability to engage in constructive debate is increasingly important. However, some individuals tend to take a more confrontational approach to discussions. They often choose to polemize (争论) rather than seek common ground. This tendency can lead to heated arguments and a breakdown in communication. To understand the implications of polemizing (争论), it is essential to recognize the context in which this behavior occurs. Often, people feel passionately about their beliefs and are eager to defend them. This passion can drive them to polemize (争论) aggressively, sometimes at the expense of rational discourse. For example, in political discussions, individuals may resort to personal attacks instead of addressing the issues at hand. Moreover, polemizing (争论) can create an atmosphere of hostility, making it difficult for others to express differing opinions. When one party is overly aggressive in their stance, it discourages open dialogue and can alienate those who might otherwise contribute to the conversation. This is particularly problematic in educational settings, where diverse viewpoints are crucial for fostering critical thinking and understanding. On the other hand, there are instances where polemizing (争论) can be beneficial. In some cases, a vigorous debate can illuminate important issues and challenge prevailing norms. When done respectfully, polemizing (争论) can stimulate intellectual growth and encourage individuals to reevaluate their positions. It is essential, therefore, to strike a balance between passionate advocacy and respectful discussion. To mitigate the negative effects of polemizing (争论), individuals can adopt strategies that promote constructive dialogue. Active listening is one such strategy; by genuinely considering the perspectives of others, participants can foster a more inclusive environment. Furthermore, focusing on the issues rather than personal attacks can help maintain a civil tone during discussions. In conclusion, while polemizing (争论) can sometimes be necessary to advocate for one's beliefs, it is crucial to approach debates with respect and openness. By prioritizing constructive conversation over confrontation, we can create a more understanding and collaborative society. Engaging in meaningful discussions, rather than merely polemizing (争论), will ultimately lead to better outcomes for all parties involved.

在当今社会，参与建设性辩论的能力越来越重要。然而，一些人倾向于采取更对抗性的讨论方式。他们往往选择polemize（争论）而不是寻求共同点。这种倾向可能导致激烈的争论和沟通的破裂。要理解polemizing（争论）的含义，首先必须认识到这种行为发生的背景。人们通常对自己的信仰感到强烈，并渴望捍卫它们。这种热情可能驱使他们以攻击性方式polemize（争论），有时会以理性讨论为代价。例如，在政治讨论中，个人可能会诉诸人身攻击，而不是解决实际问题。此外，polemizing（争论）可能会创造一种敌对的氛围，使他人难以表达不同的观点。当一方过于激进时，它会阻碍开放的对话，并可能使那些本可以为讨论做出贡献的人感到疏远。这在教育环境中尤其成问题，因为多样的观点对于培养批判性思维和理解至关重要。另一方面，有时polemizing（争论）是有益的。在某些情况下，激烈的辩论可以揭示重要问题并挑战现行规范。当以尊重的方式进行时，polemizing（争论）可以刺激智力成长并鼓励个人重新评估自己的立场。因此，找到激情倡导与尊重讨论之间的平衡至关重要。为了减轻polemizing（争论）的负面影响，个人可以采用促进建设性对话的策略。积极倾听就是一种策略；通过真诚地考虑他人的观点，参与者可以营造一个更加包容的环境。此外，专注于问题而不是人身攻击可以帮助在讨论中保持文明的语气。总之，虽然polemizing（争论）有时是捍卫自己信念所必需的，但以尊重和开放的态度参与辩论至关重要。通过优先考虑建设性对话而非对抗，我们可以创造一个更加理解和合作的社会。参与有意义的讨论，而不仅仅是polemizing（争论），最终将为所有参与者带来更好的结果。