rightist

简明释义

英[ˈraɪtɪst]美[ˈraɪtɪst]

n. 右派人士；右翼分子

adj. 右派的；右翼的

复 数 r i g h t i s t s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The rightist 右派 ideology often prioritizes national sovereignty over international cooperation.

右派意识形态通常优先考虑国家主权而非国际合作。

2.Many consider his policies to be rightist 右派的 due to their emphasis on free market principles.

由于他政策强调自由市场原则，许多人认为他的政策是右派的。

3.The debate featured a prominent rightist 右派人士 who argued for traditional values.

辩论中出现了一位杰出的右派人士，他主张传统价值观。

4.Some people view the rightist 右派 movement as a reaction to globalization.

一些人认为右派运动是对全球化的反应。

5.The rightist 右派 party won the election by promising lower taxes.

该右派政党通过承诺减税赢得了选举。

作文

The term rightist refers to individuals or groups that hold conservative or reactionary views, often advocating for traditional values and limited government intervention in economic matters. In many political contexts, rightists are contrasted with their counterparts on the left, who typically support progressive reforms and greater government involvement in social issues. Understanding the implications of being a rightist is crucial for comprehending the broader political landscape, especially in democratic societies where multiple ideologies compete for influence.Historically, the label rightist has been associated with various movements and parties across the globe. For instance, in the early 20th century, European politics saw the rise of rightist parties that reacted against socialist movements and sought to preserve national identity and cultural heritage. These parties often emphasized the importance of law and order, advocating for strict immigration policies and a strong military presence. The rightist ideology in this context was rooted in a desire to maintain stability and resist what they perceived as the chaos brought about by radical changes.In contemporary politics, the term rightist can encompass a wide range of beliefs, from moderate conservatives who advocate for fiscal responsibility to more extreme factions that may embrace nationalism or populism. For example, in the United States, the Republican Party is often viewed as the primary rightist party, promoting free-market principles, lower taxes, and a strong national defense. However, within the party, there are varying degrees of rightist thought, with some members advocating for more extreme measures such as stricter immigration laws or isolationist foreign policies.The rise of rightist populism in recent years has sparked significant debate among scholars and political analysts. Many argue that this trend reflects a growing discontent with globalization and the perceived failures of liberal policies. Supporters of rightist populism often claim to represent the interests of the 'common people' against an elite establishment, which they accuse of neglecting their needs. This dynamic has led to a resurgence of rightist movements in various countries, including Brazil, Hungary, and Italy, each with its own unique context yet sharing common themes of nationalism and skepticism towards immigration.Critics of rightist ideologies often point to the potential dangers associated with such movements. They argue that extreme rightist views can lead to xenophobia, racism, and a disregard for human rights. The challenge for modern democracies lies in balancing the legitimate concerns raised by those who identify as rightist with the need to uphold inclusive values that promote equality and justice for all citizens.In conclusion, the concept of rightist is multifaceted and varies significantly depending on cultural and historical contexts. While it can represent a legitimate political stance advocating for stability and tradition, it can also be associated with exclusionary practices and ideologies. As societies continue to evolve, the discourse surrounding rightist beliefs will remain a critical aspect of political dialogue, demanding careful consideration and open-mindedness from all sides. Understanding the nuances of rightist thought is essential for anyone seeking to engage meaningfully in contemporary political discussions.

“右派”一词指持有保守或反动观点的个人或团体，通常主张传统价值观和有限的政府干预经济事务。在许多政治背景中，“右派”与其左派对手形成对比，后者通常支持进步改革和更大程度的政府参与社会问题。理解作为“右派”的含义对于理解更广泛的政治格局至关重要，尤其是在民主社会中，不同意识形态之间竞争影响力。历史上，“右派”这一标签与全球各地的各种运动和政党相关联。例如，在20世纪初，欧洲政治见证了反对社会主义运动并寻求保持国家认同和文化遗产的“右派”政党的崛起。这些政党通常强调法律和秩序的重要性，主张严格的移民政策和强大的军事存在。在这种背景下，“右派”意识形态根植于渴望维持稳定和抵制他们所认为的由激进变化带来的混乱。在当代政治中，“右派”一词可以涵盖广泛的信仰，从主张财政责任的温和保守派到可能拥抱民族主义或民粹主义的更极端派别。例如，在美国，共和党通常被视为主要的“右派”政党，促进自由市场原则、减税和强大的国防。然而，在党内，有不同程度的“右派”思想，一些成员主张更极端的措施，如更严格的移民法或孤立主义的外交政策。近年来，“右派”民粹主义的兴起引发了学者和政治分析家之间的重大辩论。许多人认为，这一趋势反映了对全球化日益不满和对自由政策失败的感知。“右派”民粹主义的支持者常常声称代表“普通人”的利益，反对他们所指责的精英建立，认为精英忽视了他们的需求。这一动态导致了包括巴西、匈牙利和意大利在内的多个国家“右派”运动的复兴，每个国家都有其独特的背景，但共享民族主义和对移民的怀疑等共同主题。批评“右派”意识形态的人士常常指出与这些运动相关的潜在危险。他们认为，极端的“右派”观点可能导致排外、种族主义和对人权的漠视。现代民主国家面临的挑战在于平衡那些认同为“右派”的人提出的合理关切与维护促进所有公民平等和正义的包容性价值观之间的关系。总之，“右派”概念是多方面的，因文化和历史背景的不同而显著变化。虽然它可以代表一种合法的政治立场，主张稳定和传统，但也可能与排斥性做法和意识形态相关联。随着社会的不断发展，围绕“右派”信仰的讨论将继续成为政治对话的关键方面，要求各方进行仔细考虑和开放的心态。理解“右派”思想的细微差别对任何寻求在当代政治讨论中有意义地参与的人来说都是至关重要的。