disfranchise

简明释义

英[dɪsˈfræntʃaɪz]美[ˌdɪsˈfræntʃaɪz]

v. 剥夺选举权；剥夺权利（或特权）；剥夺（某地）往国会派代表的权利；剥夺……的居住权（等于 disenfranchise）

第 三 人 称 单 数 d i s f r a n c h i s e s

现 在 分 词 d i s f r a n c h i s i n g

过 去 式 d i s f r a n c h i s e d

过 去 分 词 d i s f r a n c h i s e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.But if she is really driven from pillar to post, we can't disfranchise people's right of life for moral.

但是如果她真的走投无路了，那我们也不能因为道德去剥夺别人生存的权利。

2.But if she is really driven from pillar to post, we can't disfranchise people's right of life for moral.

但是如果她真的走投无路了，那我们也不能因为道德去剥夺别人生存的权利。

3.Policies that require strict voter ID can disfranchise minorities and low-income individuals.

要求严格的选民身份证明的政策可能会剥夺少数族裔和低收入者的投票权。

4.During the civil rights movement, activists fought against laws that would disfranchise African Americans.

在民权运动期间，活动家们抗争那些会剥夺非裔美国人权利的法律。

5.The new voting law may disfranchise many young voters who lack the required identification.

新的投票法可能会剥夺许多年轻选民的投票权，他们缺乏所需的身份证明。

6.Some communities feel that gerrymandering is a tactic used to disfranchise them from the electoral process.

一些社区认为，选区划分是一种用来剥夺他们参与选举过程的策略。

7.The court ruled that the changes to the voting system would disfranchise thousands of eligible voters.

法院裁定，对投票系统的更改将会剥夺成千上万合格选民的投票权。

作文

In democratic societies, the right to vote is considered one of the most fundamental freedoms. However, throughout history, there have been numerous instances where certain groups have been deliberately excluded from this process. This exclusion is often referred to as disfranchisement, which means to deprive someone of the right to vote or other rights. Understanding the implications of disfranchisement is crucial for recognizing the importance of equal representation in a democracy.The concept of disfranchisement has roots in various historical contexts, particularly concerning marginalized communities. For example, in the United States, laws were enacted that systematically disfranchised African American voters after the Reconstruction era through mechanisms such as literacy tests, poll taxes, and other bureaucratic hurdles. These measures not only stripped individuals of their voting rights but also served to reinforce systemic racism and inequality.Moreover, the disfranchisement of women was a significant issue until the early 20th century. Women fought tirelessly for their right to vote, facing societal pushback and legal barriers. The suffrage movement highlighted how disfranchisement affects not only individual rights but also the broader social fabric. When half of the population is disfranchised, the perspectives and needs of that group are ignored in political discourse, leading to policies that do not represent the interests of the entire community.In contemporary times, disfranchisement still exists in various forms. Voter ID laws, gerrymandering, and other legislative practices can disproportionately affect minority groups, young voters, and low-income individuals. These tactics can create an environment where certain populations feel powerless and disconnected from the political process. The consequences of disfranchisement are profound, as they can lead to lower voter turnout and a lack of trust in government institutions.To combat disfranchisement, many organizations advocate for voter education and accessibility. Ensuring that all citizens understand their rights and have the means to exercise them is vital for a healthy democracy. Additionally, legal challenges against disfranchisement practices have become more common, with courts often ruling in favor of expanding access to voting.In conclusion, disfranchisement represents a significant barrier to achieving true equality in democratic societies. It is essential to recognize the historical and ongoing impacts of disfranchisement on various communities. By promoting inclusivity and ensuring that every citizen has the opportunity to participate in the electoral process, we can work towards a more equitable society where every voice is heard and valued. Only then can we claim to have a truly representative democracy, free from the shadows of disfranchisement.

在民主社会中，投票权被视为最基本的自由之一。然而，在历史上，有许多实例表明某些群体被故意排除在这一过程中。这种排斥通常被称为剥夺选举权，意思是剥夺某人投票或其他权利的权利。理解剥夺选举权的含义对认识民主中平等代表的重要性至关重要。剥夺选举权的概念在各种历史背景中都有根源，特别是涉及边缘化社区。例如，在美国，法律的实施系统地剥夺选举权非裔美国选民的投票权，通过识字测试、选民税和其他官僚障碍。这些措施不仅剥夺了个人的投票权，还强化了系统性种族主义和不平等。此外，女性的剥夺选举权也是一个重要问题，直到20世纪初。女性为争取投票权而不懈努力，面临社会的反对和法律的障碍。妇女选举权运动突显了剥夺选举权如何影响个人权利以及更广泛的社会结构。当一半的人口被剥夺选举权时，该群体的观点和需求在政治话语中被忽视，导致不代表整个社区利益的政策。在当代，剥夺选举权仍然以各种形式存在。选民身份证法、选区划分和其他立法实践可能会对少数群体、年轻选民和低收入个人产生不成比例的影响。这些策略可能会造成某些人群感到无力和与政治过程脱节。剥夺选举权的后果是深远的，因为它可能导致投票率下降和对政府机构缺乏信任。为了对抗剥夺选举权，许多组织倡导选民教育和可及性。确保所有公民了解自己的权利并有能力行使这些权利，对健康的民主至关重要。此外，对剥夺选举权做法的法律挑战变得越来越普遍，法院通常裁定扩大投票的机会。总之，剥夺选举权代表了实现民主社会真正平等的重大障碍。认识到剥夺选举权对各个社区的历史和持续影响至关重要。通过促进包容性，确保每位公民都有机会参与选举过程，我们可以朝着一个更公平的社会迈进，在这个社会中，每一个声音都被听到和重视。只有这样，我们才能声称拥有一个真正代表性的民主，摆脱剥夺选举权的阴影。