lordless

简明释义

英[ˈlɔːdləs]美[ˈlɔrdləs]

adj. 无丈夫的；无君主的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.She felt like a lordless 无主的 soul wandering through life aimlessly.

她感觉自己像一颗无主的灵魂，无目的地游荡在生活中。

2.In a lordless 无主的 land, people often struggle to find their place.

在一个无主的土地上，人们常常难以找到自己的位置。

3.The novel explores themes of freedom in a lordless 无主的 environment.

这部小说探讨了在一个无主的环境中自由的主题。

4.The story is set in a lordless 无主的 kingdom where chaos reigns.

这个故事发生在一个无主的王国，混乱统治着这里。

5.In a lordless 无主的 society, individuals must fend for themselves.

在一个无主的社会中，个人必须自力更生。

作文

In a world that often feels governed by powerful figures and authority, the concept of being lordless can evoke a sense of freedom and chaos. The term lordless refers to a state of existence without a ruler or dominant force, suggesting a landscape where individuals are free to forge their own paths. This idea resonates deeply in various aspects of life, from personal autonomy to societal structures. Imagine a community where people live in a lordless environment. Here, each individual contributes to the collective well-being without the imposition of a central authority. In such a place, decisions would be made through consensus rather than dictated by a single leader or governing body. This could lead to a more egalitarian society, where everyone's voice is valued equally. However, the absence of leadership also raises questions about organization and accountability. Without a guiding hand, how would conflicts be resolved? How would resources be distributed fairly? These questions highlight the complexities of a lordless existence. Historically, there have been movements that sought to embrace a lordless philosophy. Anarchism, for example, advocates for a society without hierarchical structures, promoting voluntary cooperation among individuals. Proponents argue that this system can lead to a more just and equitable society. However, critics often point to the potential for disorder and the challenges in maintaining social cohesion without a central authority. In literature and art, the theme of lordless worlds appears frequently. Dystopian novels often depict societies that have lost their leaders, resulting in chaos and moral ambiguity. For instance, in William Golding's "Lord of the Flies," a group of boys stranded on an uninhabited island initially experiences freedom but soon descends into savagery without the constraints of societal norms. This narrative illustrates the darker side of a lordless existence, where the absence of order leads to the rise of primal instincts. Conversely, some stories celebrate the idea of a lordless world as a return to nature and self-governance. In these narratives, characters find empowerment in their independence, learning to rely on themselves and their communities rather than external authorities. This perspective suggests that while the absence of a lord may create challenges, it also opens up opportunities for growth, creativity, and self-discovery. In our modern context, the notion of being lordless can be seen in the rise of decentralized technologies and movements. The advent of blockchain technology, for instance, promises a future where transactions and agreements can occur without the need for traditional intermediaries. This shift towards decentralization reflects a desire for transparency and autonomy, echoing the age-old yearning for a lordless society. Ultimately, the concept of lordless existence invites us to reflect on the balance between freedom and order. While the allure of living without rulers can be enticing, it is essential to consider the implications of such a lifestyle. Can we truly thrive in a world devoid of structure, or do we inherently seek some form of guidance? The exploration of lordless spaces challenges us to envision new possibilities for society, governance, and personal agency. It pushes us to question the nature of power and the ways in which we can create systems that empower individuals while fostering community and cooperation. As we navigate the complexities of our interconnected lives, the idea of being lordless serves as both a cautionary tale and a beacon of potential, urging us to find our own paths while considering the collective good.

在一个常常感觉由强大人物和权威统治的世界里，lordless（无主）这一概念可以唤起一种自由与混乱的感觉。lordless这个词指的是一种没有统治者或主导力量的存在状态，暗示着个体可以自由地开辟自己的道路。这一理念在个人自主性和社会结构等各个方面深有共鸣。想象一下一个人们生活在lordless环境中的社区。在这里，每个人都为集体的福祉做出贡献，而不是受到中央权威的强加。在这样的地方，决策将通过共识而非由单一领导者或管理机构决定。这可能导致一个更加平等的社会，在这里每个人的声音都被同等重视。然而，缺乏领导也引发了关于组织和问责的问题。没有指导，冲突将如何解决？资源将如何公平分配？这些问题突显了lordless存在的复杂性。历史上，有一些运动试图拥抱lordless哲学。例如，无政府主义倡导没有等级结构的社会，促进个人之间的自愿合作。支持者认为，这种制度可以导致一个更公正和公平的社会。然而，批评者则常常指出，在没有中央权威的情况下，可能会出现混乱，以及维持社会凝聚力的挑战。在文学和艺术中，lordless世界的主题经常出现。反乌托邦小说通常描绘失去领导者的社会，导致混乱和道德模糊。例如，在威廉·戈尔丁的《蝇王》中，一群被困在无人岛上的男孩最初体验到自由，但在没有社会规范的约束下很快陷入野蛮。这一叙事展示了lordless存在的阴暗面，缺乏秩序导致原始本能的崛起。相反，一些故事庆祝lordless世界的理念，作为回归自然和自我治理的表现。在这些叙述中，角色在独立中找到赋权，学习依靠自己和社区，而不是外部权威。这一观点表明，虽然缺乏领主可能会带来挑战，但也为成长、创造力和自我发现打开了机会。在我们现代的背景下，lordless的概念可以在去中心化技术和运动的兴起中看到。例如，区块链技术的出现承诺了一个交易和协议可以在没有传统中介的情况下进行的未来。这种向去中心化的转变反映了对透明度和自主性的渴望，呼应了人们对lordless社会的古老渴望。最终，lordless存在的概念邀请我们反思自由与秩序之间的平衡。虽然生活在没有统治者的世界中的诱惑令人向往，但考虑这种生活方式的影响至关重要。我们真的能在没有结构的世界中茁壮成长，还是我们本质上寻求某种形式的指导？对lordless空间的探索挑战我们设想社会、治理和个人代理的新可能性。它推动我们质疑权力的本质以及我们如何能够创建赋予个体权力的系统，同时促进社区和合作。当我们在互联生活的复杂性中航行时，lordless的理念既是警示故事，也是潜力的灯塔，敦促我们在考虑集体利益的同时寻找自己的道路。