sharp cut-off

简明释义

锐截止

英英释义

例句

1.There is a sharp cut-off for applications to the program, which is set at the end of the month.

该项目的申请有一个严格的截止日期，定在月底。

2.Due to budget constraints, there was a sharp cut-off on new hires this quarter.

由于预算限制，本季度对新员工的招聘有一个严格的限制。

3.The competition rules stated a sharp cut-off time for all entries.

比赛规则规定所有参赛作品的提交时间有一个严格的截止时间。

4.The project deadline had a sharp cut-off that left no room for late submissions.

项目截止日期有一个严格的截止点，没有任何迟交的余地。

5.Students must meet the sharp cut-off for grades to qualify for the scholarship.

学生必须达到奖学金的严格分数线才能有资格申请。

作文

In today's fast-paced world, the concept of a sharp cut-off can be observed in various aspects of life, particularly in education and employment. A sharp cut-off refers to a clear and defined limit that separates those who qualify from those who do not. This term is often used in academic settings, such as standardized testing or university admissions, where students must meet specific criteria to gain entry into a program. For instance, many prestigious universities implement a sharp cut-off for test scores, meaning that only applicants who achieve above a certain score will be considered for admission.The implications of a sharp cut-off can be significant. On one hand, it allows institutions to streamline their selection process, ensuring that they only admit candidates who meet their standards. This can lead to a more competitive and high-achieving student body. However, on the other hand, a sharp cut-off can also create barriers for students who may have the potential to succeed but fall just short of the required threshold. For example, a student who has a score of 89 may be overlooked in favor of another student with a score of 90, despite the fact that both students may possess similar skills and capabilities.Moreover, the use of a sharp cut-off can perpetuate inequalities in education. Students from disadvantaged backgrounds may not have access to the same resources and opportunities as their more affluent peers, which can result in lower test scores. As a result, these students may be unfairly excluded from opportunities based solely on a sharp cut-off, rather than their overall potential or character. This raises important questions about fairness and equity in educational systems.In the workplace, the idea of a sharp cut-off can be seen in hiring practices. Many companies utilize strict criteria when evaluating job applicants, which can include minimum years of experience, specific skill sets, or educational qualifications. While these requirements can help employers identify suitable candidates, they can also lead to the exclusion of talented individuals who may not fit the traditional mold. For example, a candidate with extensive real-world experience but no formal degree may be passed over for a position simply because they did not meet the sharp cut-off established by the employer.Ultimately, while sharp cut-off criteria can serve a purpose in maintaining standards, it is essential to recognize the potential drawbacks. Institutions and employers should strive to create more holistic evaluation processes that consider a broader range of factors, allowing for a more inclusive approach. By doing so, they can ensure that deserving candidates are not overlooked due to rigid thresholds.In conclusion, the concept of a sharp cut-off is prevalent in both educational and professional contexts, serving as a double-edged sword. It can enhance efficiency and maintain standards, but it can also lead to exclusion and perpetuate inequality. As society continues to evolve, it is crucial to reevaluate the criteria we use to assess merit and consider how we can create more equitable systems that provide opportunities for all individuals, regardless of where they stand concerning a sharp cut-off.

在当今快节奏的世界中，‘sharp cut-off’这一概念可以在生活的各个方面观察到，特别是在教育和就业中。‘sharp cut-off’指的是一个明确且清晰的界限，将符合条件的人与不符合条件的人区分开来。这个术语通常用于学术环境中，比如标准化考试或大学录取，学生必须满足特定的标准才能进入某个项目。例如，许多名校在考试分数上实施‘sharp cut-off’，这意味着只有那些达到某一分数以上的申请者才会被考虑录取。‘sharp cut-off’的影响可能是显著的。一方面，它使机构能够简化选择过程，确保只录取符合标准的候选人。这可以导致更具竞争力和高成就的学生群体。然而，另一方面，‘sharp cut-off’也可能为那些可能有成功潜力但刚好未达到要求门槛的学生设置障碍。例如，一个得分为89的学生可能会被忽视，而选择得分为90的另一位学生，尽管这两个学生可能具有相似的技能和能力。此外，‘sharp cut-off’的使用可能会加剧教育中的不平等。来自弱势背景的学生可能无法获得与更富裕同龄人相同的资源和机会，这可能导致较低的考试成绩。因此，这些学生可能会因仅仅基于‘sharp cut-off’而被不公平地排除在机会之外，而不是他们的整体潜力或品格。这引发了关于教育系统公平性和公正性的重大问题。在职场中，‘sharp cut-off’的概念可以在招聘实践中看到。许多公司在评估求职者时采用严格的标准，这可能包括最低工作经验年限、特定技能或教育资格。虽然这些要求可以帮助雇主识别合适的候选人，但它们也可能导致有才能的个人被排除在外，因为他们可能不符合传统的标准。例如，一位拥有丰富实际经验但没有正式学位的候选人可能会因为没有达到雇主设定的‘sharp cut-off’而被拒绝。最终，虽然‘sharp cut-off’标准在维护标准方面可以发挥作用，但重要的是要认识到潜在的缺点。机构和雇主应该努力创造更全面的评估过程，考虑更广泛的因素，从而实现更具包容性的方法。通过这样做，他们可以确保值得的候选人不会因僵化的门槛而被忽视。总之，‘sharp cut-off’的概念在教育和职业背景中普遍存在，既是一把双刃剑。它可以提高效率并维护标准，但也可能导致排斥和延续不平等。随着社会的不断发展，重新评估我们用来评估优劣的标准至关重要，并考虑如何创建更公平的系统，为所有个人提供机会，无论他们在‘sharp cut-off’方面处于何种位置。