sham plea

简明释义

虚伪的申述

英英释义

例句

1.Many saw his apology as a sham plea for sympathy rather than genuine remorse.

许多人认为他的道歉是一个虚假的辩护，寻求同情而不是出于真正的悔恨。

2.In court, the lawyer argued that the sham plea was merely a tactic to delay the proceedings.

在法庭上，律师辩称这个虚假的辩护只是拖延诉讼程序的策略。

3.The judge quickly dismissed the sham plea as it lacked any credible evidence.

法官迅速驳回了这个虚假的辩护，因为没有任何可信的证据。

4.The defendant's claim of mental illness was seen as a sham plea to avoid a harsher sentence.

被告声称精神疾病被视为一个虚假的辩护，试图逃避更严厉的判决。

5.The prosecutor pointed out that the defendant’s sham plea was an insult to the justice system.

检察官指出，被告的虚假的辩护是对司法系统的侮辱。

作文

In the realm of law and justice, the concept of a sham plea is one that raises significant ethical concerns. A sham plea refers to a legal argument or defense that is not genuine or sincere, often used to manipulate the judicial process or to deceive the court. This practice can undermine the integrity of the legal system, as it exploits loopholes and can lead to unjust outcomes. Understanding the implications of a sham plea is crucial for both legal professionals and the public at large.The use of a sham plea can manifest in various forms. For example, a defendant might claim an alibi that they know is false, hoping to create reasonable doubt in the minds of jurors. Alternatively, a lawyer might use a sham plea to negotiate a more favorable settlement, even when the underlying case lacks merit. These tactics not only jeopardize the pursuit of justice but also waste valuable court resources.One of the most troubling aspects of a sham plea is its potential to erode public trust in the legal system. When people perceive that individuals can evade accountability through deceitful means, it fosters cynicism about the fairness of trials and the efficacy of legal proceedings. The consequences of such erosion can be profound, leading to a lack of cooperation with law enforcement and a general belief that the system is rigged in favor of those who can afford to manipulate it.Moreover, the implications of a sham plea extend beyond individual cases. Systematically, if such practices are tolerated, they could contribute to a culture where dishonesty is normalized within the legal profession. This could lead to an increase in frivolous lawsuits and a backlog of cases that further strains an already overburdened judicial system. Legal professionals must remain vigilant against the allure of using sham pleas as a strategy, as doing so not only compromises their integrity but also the very foundations of justice.To combat the misuse of sham pleas, several measures can be implemented. Courts can adopt stricter guidelines to identify and penalize those who attempt to use insincere arguments. Additionally, legal education should emphasize the importance of ethical practice and the long-term consequences of engaging in dishonest tactics. By fostering a culture of integrity within the legal community, we can work towards minimizing the occurrence of sham pleas and promoting a more just society.In conclusion, the concept of a sham plea serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between legal strategy and ethical responsibility. While the pursuit of a favorable outcome is a natural instinct for any legal representative, it is essential to remember that the ultimate goal of the justice system is to serve the truth and uphold the rule of law. By rejecting the temptation of sham pleas, we can ensure that justice prevails and that the legal system remains a pillar of fairness and accountability for all.

在法律与正义的领域中，‘sham plea’这一概念引发了重大伦理问题。‘sham plea’指的是一种不真实或不真诚的法律论点或辩护，通常用于操纵司法程序或欺骗法庭。这种做法可能会破坏法律体系的完整性，因为它利用了漏洞并可能导致不公正的结果。理解‘sham plea’的影响对法律专业人士和公众来说至关重要。‘sham plea’的使用可以以多种形式表现出来。例如，被告可能会声称一个他们知道是虚假的不在场证明，希望在陪审员心中制造合理怀疑。或者，律师可能会利用‘sham plea’来谈判更有利的和解，即使基础案件没有依据。这些策略不仅危及追求正义的目标，还浪费了宝贵的法庭资源。‘sham plea’最令人担忧的方面之一是它可能侵蚀公众对法律系统的信任。当人们认为个人能够通过欺骗手段逃避责任时，这会滋生对审判公正性和法律程序有效性的愤世嫉俗。这种侵蚀的后果可能是深远的，导致对执法的缺乏合作，以及普遍认为系统偏向于那些能够操纵它的人。此外，‘sham plea’的影响不仅限于个别案件。如果这种做法被容忍，可能会导致一种文化，在这种文化中，不诚实在法律职业中被正常化。这可能导致无谓诉讼的增加，并造成案件积压，进一步加重已经过于繁忙的司法系统。法律专业人士必须保持警惕，抵制使用‘sham plea’作为策略的诱惑，因为这样做不仅损害了他们的诚信，也损害了正义的根基。为了打击‘sham plea’的滥用，可以实施几项措施。法院可以采取更严格的指南，以识别和惩罚那些试图使用不真诚论点的人。此外，法律教育应强调伦理实践的重要性以及参与不诚实战术的长期后果。通过在法律界培养诚信的文化，我们可以努力减少‘sham plea’的发生，促进一个更加公正的社会。总之，‘sham plea’的概念提醒我们法律策略与伦理责任之间的微妙平衡。虽然追求有利结果是任何法律代表的自然本能，但必须记住，司法系统的最终目标是服务真相并维护法治。通过拒绝‘sham plea’的诱惑，我们可以确保正义得以实现，法律系统仍然是所有人公平与问责的支柱。