tyrannically

简明释义

英[/tɪˈrænɪkli/]美[/tɪˈrænɪkli/]

adv. 专横地；残暴地

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The measures of the king and ministry were rendered more tyrannically violent by an opposition.

反抗使国王和教会采取了更加横暴的措施。

2.The measures of the king and ministry were rendered more tyrannically violent by an opposition.

反抗使国王和教会采取了更加横暴的措施。

3.The children felt stifled by their tyrannically strict parents who imposed rigid rules.

孩子们感到被父母专制地严格管束，施加了死板的规则。

4.In the novel, the king is portrayed as a tyrannically figure who punishes his subjects harshly.

在这部小说中，国王被描绘成一个专横地对待他臣民的角色，严厉惩罚他们。

5.The dictator ruled the country tyrannically, suppressing any form of dissent.

这个独裁者专制地统治着国家，压制任何形式的异议。

6.The manager ran the team tyrannically, leading to high turnover rates among employees.

这位经理专制地管理团队，导致员工的高流失率。

7.She was tyrannically controlling in her relationships, leaving no room for her partner's opinions.

她在关系中专制地控制，根本不留给伴侣发表意见的空间。

作文

In today's world, the concept of leadership has evolved significantly. However, history is rife with examples of leaders who ruled tyrannically (专制地), imposing their will upon the people without regard for their rights or freedoms. One of the most infamous leaders in this regard was Adolf Hitler, whose regime was characterized by extreme oppression and brutality. His rise to power in Germany was marked by a complete disregard for democratic principles, leading to a government that operated tyrannically (专制地) and instilled fear among its citizens. The consequences of such tyrannical (专制的) leadership are often catastrophic, not only for the individuals directly affected but also for society as a whole. People living under tyrannical (专制的) regimes often experience a loss of personal freedoms, rampant human rights abuses, and a culture of fear that stifles creativity and progress. For instance, in North Korea, the government operates tyrannically (专制地), controlling every aspect of life, from what people can say to what they can believe. This has resulted in a populace that is largely uninformed and unable to challenge the status quo.Moreover, tyrannical (专制的) governments often employ propaganda to maintain control over their citizens. By manipulating information and spreading disinformation, these regimes create a narrative that supports their rule while suppressing dissent. The media becomes a tool of the state, and any form of opposition is met with severe repercussions. This was evident during the reign of Joseph Stalin in the Soviet Union, where dissenters were silenced through imprisonment or execution. The atmosphere of fear fostered by such tyrannical (专制的) governance leads to a society where individuals are afraid to express their true thoughts or beliefs.The impact of tyrannical (专制的) leadership extends beyond immediate oppression. It can lead to long-lasting societal scars that take generations to heal. Countries that have experienced tyrannical (专制的) rule often struggle with political instability and economic challenges long after the regime has fallen. For example, after the fall of Saddam Hussein in Iraq, the nation was left in turmoil, grappling with sectarian violence and political chaos. The legacy of his tyrannical (专制的) rule created divisions that continue to affect the country today.In contrast, democratic leadership fosters an environment where individuals feel empowered to voice their opinions and participate in governance. Leaders who prioritize the needs of their constituents and respect human rights create a society that thrives on collaboration and innovation. The difference between tyrannical (专制的) and democratic leadership is stark, and the benefits of the latter are clear. Societies that embrace democratic values tend to be more prosperous, stable, and equitable.In conclusion, understanding the implications of tyrannical (专制地) leadership is crucial for recognizing the importance of democracy and human rights. History serves as a reminder of the dangers posed by tyrannical (专制的) rulers, and it is our responsibility to advocate for systems of governance that promote freedom, equality, and justice for all. By learning from the past, we can work towards a future where tyrannical (专制地) rule is a relic of history, and democracy flourishes worldwide.

在当今世界，领导力的概念已经发生了显著变化。然而，历史上充斥着那些以专制地（tyrannically）统治人民、无视他们权利和自由的领导者的例子。其中一个最臭名昭著的领导者就是阿道夫·希特勒，他的政权以极端的压迫和残酷著称。他在德国的崛起标志着对民主原则的完全无视，导致一个以专制地（tyrannically）运作的政府，给公民带来了恐惧。 这种专制的（tyrannical）领导所带来的后果往往是灾难性的，不仅影响到直接受害的个人，也影响到整个社会。在专制的（tyrannical）政权下生活的人们通常会失去个人自由，遭受严重的人权侵犯，以及一种压制创造力和进步的恐惧文化。例如，在朝鲜，政府以专制地（tyrannically）控制生活的每一个方面，从人们可以说什么到他们可以相信什么。这导致了一个大多数人缺乏信息、无法挑战现状的民众。此外，专制的（tyrannical）政府通常利用宣传来维持对公民的控制。通过操纵信息和传播虚假信息，这些政权创造出一种支持其统治的叙述，同时压制异议。媒体成为国家的工具，任何形式的反对意见都会受到严厉的惩罚。这在约瑟夫·斯大林统治的苏联中显而易见，异议人士通过监禁或处决被沉默。这样的专制的（tyrannical）治理所营造的恐惧氛围导致了一个人们害怕表达真实思想或信仰的社会。专制的（tyrannical）领导的影响超越了直接的压迫。它可能导致长期的社会创伤，需要几代人才能愈合。经历过专制的（tyrannical）统治的国家，往往在政权倒台后仍然面临政治不稳定和经济挑战。例如，在萨达姆·侯赛因倒台后，伊拉克陷入动荡，面临宗派暴力和政治混乱。他的专制的（tyrannical）统治遗留下的分裂至今仍在影响这个国家。相比之下，民主领导促进了一个个体能够发声和参与治理的环境。优先考虑选民需求并尊重人权的领导者，创造了一个在合作和创新中蓬勃发展的社会。专制的（tyrannical）领导与民主领导之间的差异是显而易见的，后者的好处也显而易见。拥抱民主价值观的社会往往更繁荣、更稳定、更公平。总之，理解专制的（tyrannically）领导的含义对于认识民主和人权的重要性至关重要。历史提醒我们要警惕专制的（tyrannical）统治者所带来的危险，而我们的责任是倡导促进所有人自由、平等和正义的治理体系。通过从过去学习，我们可以努力实现一个专制的（tyrannically）统治成为历史遗迹的未来，让民主在世界各地蓬勃发展。