versus
简明释义
prep. （比赛或诉讼中）以……为对手，与……竞争；与……相对，与……相比
英英释义
Used to indicate opposition or contrast between two things, often in a legal or competitive context. | 用于表示两个事物之间的对立或对比，通常在法律或竞争环境中使用。 |
单词用法
A 对 B | |
A队对B队 | |
原告对被告 | |
X 对 Y | |
X 和 Y 之间的竞争 | |
关于 X 与 Y 的辩论 |
同义词
反义词
| 和 | A和B正在一起工作。 | ||
| 与 | 他和朋友们一起去了公园。 |
例句
1.Later, I developed a broader theory of what separates the two general classes of learners helpless versus mastery oriented.
后来，我发展了一个更广泛的理论来区分无助型学习者和掌握型学习者。
2."This turnaround is about Coles versus Coles, " he said.
“这次转型是高斯对战高斯。”他说。
3.Print server versus direct printing.
打印服务器与直接打印。
4.Last time, we argued about the case of Queen versus Dudley and Stevens, the lifeboat case, the case of cannibalism at sea.
上次，我们讨论了奎恩诉达德利和斯蒂芬斯案，即救生艇的案例，海上食人惨案。
5.Later, I developed a broader theory of what separates the two general classes of learners-helpless versus mastery-oriented.
后来，我提出了一个更广泛的理论，来区分无助型学习者和掌控型学习者。
6.Only 18.8% of the class of 1982 had some kind of diploma four years after high school, versus 45% of the class of 1972.
相对于1972届学生中有45%在中学毕业4年后获得了某种文凭来说，1982届学生的这一比例只有18.8%。
7.In the upcoming game, the home team will face off against their rivals versus 对抗 the visiting team.
在即将到来的比赛中，主队将与他们的对手 versus 对抗 客队。
8.The debate topic is climate change versus 与 economic growth.
辩论主题是气候变化 versus 与 经济增长。
9.The documentary explores the differences between urban living versus 与 rural living.
这部纪录片探讨了城市生活 versus 与 农村生活之间的差异。
10.The study compares the effectiveness of drug A versus 与 drug B.
这项研究比较了药物A versus 与 药物B的有效性。
11.In this article, we discuss the pros and cons of online learning versus 与 traditional classroom learning.
在这篇文章中，我们讨论了在线学习 versus 与 传统课堂学习的利弊。
作文
In today's fast-paced world, we often find ourselves caught in a dilemma of choices. One of the most common debates is the age-old question of quality 与 quantity. This discussion can be seen in various aspects of life, from education to consumer goods, and even in our daily routines. The concept of quality 与 quantity is not just a simple comparison; it represents a fundamental conflict in how we prioritize our decisions and values.When it comes to education, many argue that a smaller class size allows for more personalized attention from teachers, leading to a higher quality of learning. On the other hand, larger classes may provide a wider range of perspectives and experiences, which can enrich the educational experience. Here, we see the clash of quality 与 quantity as educators strive to balance these two important factors.Similarly, in the realm of consumer goods, the debate continues. Some individuals prefer to invest in a few high-quality items that will last a long time, while others opt for purchasing numerous lower-quality products that may not stand the test of time. This choice often reflects personal values and financial situations. The preference for quality 与 quantity can reveal much about an individual's priorities and lifestyle.Moreover, in our daily routines, we frequently face the decision of whether to focus on completing more tasks or ensuring that each task is done exceptionally well. For instance, when managing time, some people may choose to multitask, believing that they can accomplish more in a shorter period. However, this often leads to a decrease in the quality of work produced. Conversely, those who take the time to focus on a single task may find that their output is of a higher standard, albeit at the cost of completing fewer tasks overall. This ongoing struggle between quality 与 quantity illustrates the complexities of modern life.The impact of technology further complicates this debate. In the digital age, we have access to vast amounts of information and resources, which can lead to an overwhelming number of choices. Social media platforms, for example, often promote a culture of 'more is better,' encouraging users to accumulate followers and likes rather than fostering genuine connections. This shift raises questions about the quality of interactions we have online 与 the sheer volume of them.Ultimately, the question of quality 与 quantity is one that each person must navigate according to their own values and circumstances. It is essential to recognize that both aspects hold significance in different contexts. Striking a balance between the two can lead to more fulfilling experiences in life. As we continue to grapple with this dichotomy, it is crucial to reflect on what truly matters to us and how we can make choices that align with our values. Whether we lean towards quality 与 quantity, or find a middle ground, understanding this dynamic can empower us to make more informed decisions in our lives.
在当今快节奏的世界中，我们常常发现自己陷入选择的困境。最常见的辩论之一是古老的问题：质量与数量。这一讨论可以在生活的各个方面看到，从教育到消费品，甚至在我们的日常生活中。质量与数量的概念不仅仅是简单的比较；它代表了我们在优先考虑决策和价值观时所面临的根本冲突。在教育方面，许多人认为较小的班级规模可以让教师提供更多个性化的关注，从而提高学习质量。另一方面，较大的班级可能提供更广泛的观点和经验，这可以丰富教育体验。在这里，我们看到了质量与数量的冲突，因为教育工作者努力平衡这两个重要因素。同样，在消费品领域，这场辩论依然存在。一些人更愿意投资于少量高质量的物品，这些物品会持续很长时间，而另一些人则选择购买许多低质量的产品，这些产品可能无法经受时间的考验。这种选择往往反映个人的价值观和经济状况。对质量与数量的偏好可以揭示出一个人的优先事项和生活方式。此外，在我们的日常生活中，我们经常面临是否专注于完成更多任务或确保每个任务都做得非常好的决定。例如，在管理时间时，一些人可能选择多任务处理，认为这样可以在更短的时间内完成更多工作。然而，这常常导致所产出的工作质量下降。相反，那些花时间专注于单个任务的人可能会发现他们的输出质量更高，尽管完成的任务总数较少。这种质量与数量之间的持续斗争说明了现代生活的复杂性。技术的影响进一步使这一辩论复杂化。在数字时代，我们可以接触到大量的信息和资源，这可能导致选择的数量令人难以承受。例如，社交媒体平台常常促进“更多更好”的文化，鼓励用户积累粉丝和点赞，而不是培养真正的联系。这种转变引发了关于我们在线互动的质量与其数量的质疑。最终，质量与数量的问题是每个人必须根据自己的价值观和情况来应对的。认识到这两个方面在不同背景下都具有重要意义是至关重要的。在两者之间找到平衡可以使我们的生活经历更加充实。当我们继续与这一二分法斗争时，反思什么对我们真正重要，以及如何做出与我们价值观一致的选择，是至关重要的。无论我们倾向于质量与数量，还是找到中间道路，理解这一动态可以使我们在生活中做出更明智的决策。
