confute

简明释义

英[kənˈfjuːt]美[kənˈfjuːt]

vt. 驳斥，驳倒

第 三 人 称 单 数 c o n f u t e s

现 在 分 词 c o n f u t i n g

过 去 式 c o n f u t e d

过 去 分 词 c o n f u t e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Read not to contradict and confute; nor to believe and take for granted; nor to find talk and discourse; but to weigh and consider.

读书既不能吹毛求疵，也不能轻信尽信，更不能为了猎取谈话资料而断章取义，而应为了省察和思考。

2.Face others is deliberately insult should disregard still confute?

面对别人故意侮辱该不理还是反驳？

3.Read not to contradict and confute; nor to believe and take for granted; nor to find talk and discourse; but to weigh and consider.

读书既不能吹毛求疵，也不能轻信尽信，更不能为了猎取谈话资料而断章取义，而应为了省察和思考。

4.He was unable to confute the debater.

他未能驳倒对方的辩论者。

5.The lawyer worked hard to confute the accusations against his client.

律师努力工作以驳斥对他客户的指控。

6.In her debate, she aimed to confute the opponent's arguments effectively.

在辩论中，她旨在有效地驳斥对手的论点。

7.He presented facts to confute the myths surrounding climate change.

他提供了事实以驳斥围绕气候变化的神话。

8.The scientist was able to confute the outdated theory with new evidence.

这位科学家能够用新的证据驳斥过时的理论。

9.The article aims to confute common misconceptions about nutrition.

这篇文章旨在驳斥关于营养的常见误解。

作文

In the realm of academic discourse, it is essential to engage with differing viewpoints and arguments. The ability to critically analyze and confute opposing claims is a vital skill for any scholar. To confute means to prove a statement or theory to be wrong or false, often through argumentation or evidence. This process not only strengthens one's own position but also enhances the overall quality of the debate. Consider the example of climate change discussions. Many skeptics argue that climate change is a natural phenomenon rather than a result of human activity. In order to confute this claim, one must present scientific data that demonstrates the significant impact of human actions, such as carbon emissions, on global temperatures. By providing empirical evidence, researchers can effectively confute the skepticism surrounding climate change and advocate for necessary policy changes. Moreover, the ability to confute an argument does not merely serve to defend one’s own beliefs; it also fosters a deeper understanding of the subject matter. Engaging with counterarguments requires a thorough examination of both sides, which ultimately leads to a more nuanced perspective. For instance, in debates about renewable energy sources, proponents must be prepared to confute arguments regarding their feasibility and cost-effectiveness. By addressing these concerns head-on, advocates can build a stronger case for transitioning to sustainable energy solutions. In addition, the act of confuting opposing views encourages intellectual growth. It challenges individuals to think critically and develop their reasoning skills. When faced with a well-articulated counterargument, one is compelled to reassess their own position and consider alternative viewpoints. This process of reflection and reevaluation is crucial for personal and academic development. Furthermore, the practice of confuting is not limited to formal debates or scholarly articles. It can be applied in everyday conversations as well. For example, when discussing social issues, one might encounter differing opinions on topics such as immigration or healthcare. By respectfully confuting misconceptions and presenting factual information, individuals can contribute to a more informed public discourse. This approach not only promotes understanding but also encourages others to engage in critical thinking. Ultimately, the ability to confute opposing arguments is a cornerstone of effective communication and reasoning. It empowers individuals to stand firm in their beliefs while remaining open to dialogue and discussion. As society continues to grapple with complex issues, the importance of being able to confute misinformation and unfounded claims cannot be overstated. By honing this skill, we can foster a culture of inquiry and understanding, paving the way for more productive conversations and informed decision-making. In conclusion, the term confute encapsulates the essence of critical thinking and debate. It serves as a reminder that engaging with opposing viewpoints is not only necessary but also beneficial for personal and societal growth. Whether in academic settings or everyday interactions, the ability to confute erroneous claims is crucial in our pursuit of knowledge and truth.

在学术讨论的领域中，参与不同观点和论点的交流至关重要。批判性地分析并驳斥对立主张的能力是任何学者必备的重要技能。驳斥意味着通过辩论或证据证明某个陈述或理论是错误的。这一过程不仅增强了自己的立场，也提高了整体辩论的质量。以气候变化讨论为例。许多怀疑者认为气候变化是一种自然现象，而不是人类活动的结果。为了驳斥这一说法，必须提供科学数据，证明人类行为（如碳排放）对全球温度的重大影响。通过提供实证证据，研究人员可以有效地驳斥关于气候变化的怀疑，并倡导必要的政策变更。此外，驳斥一个论点的能力不仅仅是为了捍卫自己的信念；它还促进了对主题的更深入理解。与反对意见的互动需要全面审视双方，这最终导致更微妙的观点。例如，在可再生能源的辩论中，支持者必须准备好驳斥有关其可行性和成本效益的论点。通过正面应对这些问题，倡导者可以为向可持续能源解决方案的过渡建立更强有力的案例。此外，驳斥对立观点的行为不仅限于正式的辩论或学术文章。它也可以应用于日常对话中。例如，在讨论社会问题时，人们可能会遇到关于移民或医疗保健等主题的不同意见。通过尊重地驳斥误解并提供事实信息，个人可以为更具信息量的公共讨论做出贡献。这种方法不仅促进理解，还鼓励他人参与批判性思维。最终，驳斥对立论点的能力是有效沟通和推理的基石。它使个人能够坚定自己的信念，同时保持开放的对话和讨论态度。随着社会继续应对复杂问题，能够驳斥虚假信息和毫无根据的主张的重要性不容小觑。通过磨练这一技能，我们可以培养探究和理解的文化，为更具建设性的对话和明智的决策铺平道路。总之，驳斥这一术语概括了批判性思维和辩论的本质。它提醒我们，参与对立观点的交流不仅是必要的，而且对个人和社会的成长都是有益的。无论是在学术环境还是日常互动中，能够驳斥错误主张的能力对于我们追求知识和真理至关重要。