Right of Angary

简明释义

非常征用权

英英释义

例句

1.The government invoked the Right of Angary to commandeer private vessels for emergency relief efforts.

政府行使了征用权以征用私船进行紧急救援工作。

2.Local authorities declared a state of emergency and exercised the Right of Angary to use all available transport resources.

地方当局宣布进入紧急状态，并行使征用权以使用所有可用的运输资源。

3.During wartime, nations often rely on the Right of Angary to ensure their military operations are not hindered.

在战争期间，各国常常依赖征用权以确保军事行动不受阻碍。

4.The Right of Angary allows governments to take control of essential services during crises.

在危机期间，征用权允许政府控制基本服务。

5.The shipping company was compensated after their ship was taken under the Right of Angary for naval exercises.

在其船只因海军演习被征用后，航运公司获得了赔偿，依据征用权。

作文

The concept of the Right of Angary refers to a legal principle that allows a state to seize foreign vessels or aircraft in times of war or national emergency. This right is rooted in the necessity of protecting national interests and ensuring the security of a nation during tumultuous times. Understanding the Right of Angary is essential for grasping how international law operates concerning maritime and aerial navigation, especially during conflicts.Historically, the Right of Angary has been invoked by various nations to assert control over foreign assets that may pose a threat to their sovereignty or security. For example, during World War I and World War II, many countries exercised this right to commandeer ships and planes that were deemed to be of strategic importance or that could potentially be used against them. The rationale behind this legal provision is straightforward: in times of crisis, a state must have the authority to act decisively to protect its citizens and maintain order.However, the implementation of the Right of Angary is not without controversy. Critics argue that this principle can lead to abuses of power, where states might unjustly seize foreign property without proper compensation or justification. International law seeks to balance the rights of states with the protections afforded to foreign entities, but the reality is that conflicts often complicate these interactions. When a state exercises its Right of Angary, it must navigate a complex landscape of legal obligations and ethical considerations.In contemporary times, the Right of Angary continues to be relevant, particularly as global tensions rise and nations grapple with issues of sovereignty and security. The advent of advanced technology and new forms of warfare has further complicated the landscape. For instance, cyber warfare poses unique challenges that traditional maritime and aerial laws may not adequately address. As nations confront these modern threats, the principles underlying the Right of Angary may need to evolve to remain applicable.Moreover, the Right of Angary intersects with issues of international diplomacy and relations. When a state seizes foreign assets, it can strain diplomatic ties and lead to retaliatory actions. Thus, while the right exists to protect national interests, it must be exercised with caution and foresight. States must consider the long-term implications of invoking the Right of Angary on their relationships with other countries.In conclusion, the Right of Angary is a significant legal doctrine that highlights the tension between national security and international law. It serves as a reminder that in times of crisis, the actions taken by states can have far-reaching consequences. As we move forward in an increasingly interconnected world, understanding the nuances of the Right of Angary will be crucial for policymakers, legal experts, and scholars alike. Balancing the need for security with the imperative of respecting international norms will continue to be a central challenge for nations across the globe.

“动怒权”是指一种法律原则，允许国家在战争或国家紧急情况下征用外国船只或飞机。这一权利根植于保护国家利益和确保国家安全的必要性，尤其是在动荡时期。理解“动怒权”对于掌握国际法在海洋和空中航行方面的运作至关重要，特别是在冲突期间。历史上，各国曾多次援引“动怒权”来控制可能对其主权或安全构成威胁的外国资产。例如，在第一次和第二次世界大战期间，许多国家行使这一权利，征用被认为具有战略重要性的船只和飞机，或者那些可能被用于对抗它们的资产。这一法律条款背后的理由很简单：在危机时期，国家必须有权果断行动，以保护其公民并维护秩序。然而，“动怒权”的实施并非没有争议。批评者认为，这一原则可能导致权力滥用，国家可能在没有适当补偿或正当理由的情况下不公正地征用外国财产。国际法试图在国家权利与对外国实体的保护之间取得平衡，但现实是，冲突往往使这些互动变得复杂。当一个国家行使其“动怒权”时，必须在法律义务和道德考量的复杂环境中进行导航。在当代，“动怒权”仍然相关，特别是在全球紧张局势上升、各国应对主权和安全问题时。先进技术和新型战争形式的出现进一步复杂化了这一格局。例如，网络战争带来了独特的挑战，传统的海洋和空中法律可能无法充分应对。随着各国面对这些现代威胁，“动怒权”所依据的原则可能需要发展以保持适用性。此外，“动怒权”与国际外交和关系问题交织在一起。当一个国家征用外国资产时，可能会加剧外交关系紧张，并导致报复行为。因此，尽管这一权利存在是为了保护国家利益，但行使时必须谨慎和深思熟虑。国家必须考虑在其他国家关系中调用“动怒权”的长期影响。总之，“动怒权”是一项重要的法律原则，突显了国家安全与国际法之间的紧张关系。它提醒我们，在危机时期，国家采取的行动可能会产生深远的后果。随着我们在一个日益相互联系的世界中向前发展，理解“动怒权”的细微差别对于政策制定者、法律专家和学者来说将至关重要。在保护安全与尊重国际规范之间取得平衡，将继续成为全球各国面临的中心挑战。