Repugnancy Clause

简明释义

抵触条款

英英释义

例句

1.In legal disputes, the Repugnancy Clause can be invoked to challenge contradictory provisions within the same agreement.

在法律争议中，可以引用抵触条款来挑战同一协议中的矛盾条款。

2.The Repugnancy Clause serves to ensure that no part of the contract contradicts another, promoting consistency.

为了确保合同的各部分没有相互矛盾，抵触条款的作用是促进一致性。

3.A well-drafted Repugnancy Clause can save both parties from potential litigation by clarifying their intentions.

一条起草良好的抵触条款可以通过澄清双方的意图来避免潜在的诉讼。

4.The contract included a Repugnancy Clause that invalidated any conflicting terms, ensuring clarity in obligations.

合同中包含一条抵触条款，使任何冲突条款无效，从而确保义务的明确性。

5.During the review process, the lawyer pointed out the Repugnancy Clause as a critical element for enforcing the contract.

在审查过程中，律师指出抵触条款是执行合同的重要元素。

作文

The legal landscape of any country is often complex, filled with various statutes and regulations that govern the conduct of individuals and organizations. One important concept that emerges in this legal framework is the Repugnancy Clause, which plays a crucial role in determining the validity of laws and their compatibility with existing legal principles. Understanding the implications of the Repugnancy Clause is essential for anyone studying law or involved in legal practice.A Repugnancy Clause refers to a provision in a legal document that addresses the conflict between different laws or regulations. Essentially, it serves as a mechanism to resolve inconsistencies that may arise when new legislation is introduced. For instance, if a new law contradicts an existing one, the Repugnancy Clause helps to clarify which law takes precedence. This clause is particularly significant in jurisdictions where multiple legal systems coexist, such as federal and state laws in the United States.The significance of the Repugnancy Clause can be illustrated through various legal cases. In many instances, courts have had to interpret the applicability of laws in light of this clause. A classic example can be found in the context of constitutional law, where the supremacy of the constitution is often upheld against conflicting statutes. When a law is deemed repugnant to the constitution, it is typically struck down by the courts, reinforcing the idea that no law can stand in contradiction to the fundamental principles enshrined in the constitution.Furthermore, the Repugnancy Clause is not only relevant at the national level but also plays a vital role in international law. When countries enter into treaties or agreements, they must ensure that their domestic laws do not conflict with their international obligations. The presence of a Repugnancy Clause in these treaties allows for the resolution of potential conflicts, providing a clear framework for compliance and enforcement.In practical terms, the application of the Repugnancy Clause often involves a careful analysis of the legislative intent behind the laws in question. Legal professionals must assess the language of the statutes, the context in which they were enacted, and the overarching legal principles that govern their interpretation. This process requires a deep understanding of statutory construction and the ability to navigate the intricacies of legal reasoning.Moreover, the Repugnancy Clause underscores the importance of legislative clarity and precision. Ambiguous or poorly drafted laws can lead to disputes and confusion, making it challenging to determine which law should prevail. Therefore, lawmakers must strive to create clear and coherent legislation that minimizes the potential for repugnancy.In conclusion, the Repugnancy Clause is a fundamental aspect of legal systems that addresses conflicts between laws and ensures that legal frameworks operate harmoniously. Its relevance spans across various domains of law, from constitutional to international contexts. By grasping the concept of the Repugnancy Clause, individuals can better appreciate the complexities of legal interpretation and the importance of legislative clarity. As society continues to evolve, the role of the Repugnancy Clause will remain vital in maintaining the integrity and coherence of the law.

在任何国家的法律环境中，往往是复杂的，充满了各种法规和规定，管理着个人和组织的行为。一个重要的概念在这个法律框架中出现，那就是抵触条款，它在确定法律的有效性及其与现有法律原则的兼容性方面发挥着至关重要的作用。理解抵触条款的含义对于任何学习法律或参与法律实践的人来说都是必不可少的。抵触条款是指法律文件中的一项规定，解决不同法律或法规之间的冲突。基本上，它作为一种机制来解决引入新立法时可能出现的不一致。例如，如果一项新法律与现有法律相矛盾，抵触条款有助于澄清哪一项法律优先。这一条款在多个法律体系共存的管辖区尤为重要，例如美国的联邦和州法律。抵触条款的重要性可以通过各种法律案例来说明。在许多情况下，法院不得不根据这一条款解释法律的适用性。一个经典的例子可以在宪法法中找到，在那里，宪法的至高无上的地位通常被维护，以抵御相互冲突的法规。当一项法律被认为与宪法相抵触时，法院通常会将其撤销，从而强化了没有任何法律可以与宪法中所载的基本原则相矛盾的理念。此外，抵触条款不仅在国家层面上相关，而且在国际法中也发挥着重要作用。当国家签订条约或协议时，他们必须确保其国内法律与国际义务不冲突。这些条约中存在的抵触条款允许解决潜在的冲突，为合规和执行提供了明确的框架。在实际操作中，抵触条款的适用通常涉及对相关法律的立法意图进行仔细分析。法律专业人士必须评估法规的语言、颁布时的背景以及支配其解释的总体法律原则。这一过程需要对法定构造有深入的理解，并能够驾驭法律推理的复杂性。此外，抵触条款强调了立法清晰性和准确性的重要性。模糊或草拟不良的法律可能导致争议和混淆，使得确定哪一法律应优先变得具有挑战性。因此，立法者必须努力制定清晰和连贯的立法，以最大限度减少抵触的可能性。总之，抵触条款是法律体系中的一个基本方面，解决法律之间的冲突并确保法律框架和谐运作。它的相关性跨越了法律的各个领域，从宪法到国际背景。通过掌握抵触条款的概念，个人可以更好地欣赏法律解释的复杂性和立法清晰性的重要性。随着社会的不断发展，抵触条款的作用将在维护法律的完整性和一致性方面继续发挥重要作用。