polemic

简明释义

英[pəˈlemɪk]美[pəˈlemɪk]

n. 争论，辩论文章；辩论者；辩论术，争辩学

adj. 争辩的，辩论的

复 数 p o l e m i c s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Suddenly I had a story, an interesting story, because it wasn't just my vague polemic.

突然，我有一个故事，一个有趣的故事，不完全出于我目的不清的挑起论战本能。

2.Nor would you necessarily expect it in a polemic of this kind.

你也不会一定期望看到银行家之间展开争论。

3.It is, however, a polemic.

然而，它一场论战。

4.Even after four decades, it retains an ambiguous character, enough to satisfy the French taste for polemic and debate.

虽然过去了四十年，然而68动乱的性质仍未有定论。这充分满足了法国人对口舌之争的偏好。

5.Mr Guggenheim's film is a fascinating and alarming polemic that does, indeed, set out to speak to everyone.

古根汉姆的影片就像一场精彩、惊人的辩论，而且其开场白的确也是说给每个人听的。

6.Her speech was memorable for its polemic rather than its substance.

她的演说之所以令人难忘，不是因其内容而是因其辩论方法。

7.Readers of this overheated but often on-the-mark polemic will conclude that the safest tactic is organic food and a fly swatter.

这场过热但经常中肯的论战的读者们会下结论，最安全的策略是有机食品和一个苍蝇拍。

8.In the debate, he presented a 争论 that challenged the status quo.

在辩论中，他提出了一个挑战现状的争论。

9.The film sparked a 争论 about freedom of speech.

这部电影引发了关于言论自由的争论。

10.The author's latest book is a fierce 争论 against modern consumerism.

作者最新的书是对现代消费主义的激烈争论。

11.Her article was a 争论 on the ethics of genetic engineering.

她的文章是关于基因工程伦理的争论。

12.His speech was filled with 争论 against government policies.

他的演讲充满了对政府政策的争论。

作文

In the realm of discourse, few terms evoke as much intrigue and contention as the word polemic. A polemic refers to a strong verbal or written attack on someone or something, often characterized by a passionate argument that seeks to refute or criticize opposing viewpoints. The significance of understanding this term lies not only in its definition but also in its application across various fields such as politics, religion, and social issues.Historically, polemic literature has played a crucial role in shaping public opinion and influencing societal norms. For instance, during the Reformation, Martin Luther's polemic writings against the Catholic Church were instrumental in rallying support for Protestantism. His works, filled with fervent arguments and pointed critiques, exemplified how polemic can serve as a catalyst for change. Similarly, in contemporary society, we witness polemic debates surrounding climate change, where scientists and activists engage in heated discussions to challenge the skepticism of climate deniers, aiming to persuade the public of the urgent need for action.The nature of polemic discourse often leads to polarized opinions. While some may view it as a necessary tool for advocacy and social justice, others may perceive it as divisive and counterproductive. This dichotomy raises important questions about the role of polemic in constructive dialogue. Can a polemic approach foster understanding, or does it merely entrench divisions? The answer may lie in the intent and delivery of the argument. For example, a polemic that is rooted in respect and a genuine desire to understand the opposing viewpoint can lead to fruitful discussions. On the other hand, a vitriolic polemic that aims solely to belittle or demonize opponents can create an atmosphere of hostility, ultimately hindering productive communication. Thus, the effectiveness of polemic arguments hinges on the balance between passion and civility.Moreover, the rise of social media has transformed the landscape of polemic discourse. Platforms like Twitter and Facebook allow for rapid dissemination of polemic arguments, often amplifying extreme views and fostering echo chambers. This phenomenon can intensify conflicts, as individuals are exposed primarily to perspectives that reinforce their own beliefs. Consequently, the challenge becomes not only to engage in polemic discussions but to do so in a manner that encourages open-mindedness and critical thinking.In conclusion, the term polemic encapsulates the essence of passionate argumentation, serving as both a tool for advocacy and a potential source of division. Understanding its implications is vital for anyone seeking to navigate the complexities of contemporary discourse. As we engage in polemic discussions, let us strive for a balance between fervor and respect, recognizing that the ultimate goal should be to foster understanding and progress rather than merely to win an argument. By doing so, we can harness the power of polemic to inspire change while promoting a more inclusive and empathetic dialogue among diverse perspectives.

在话语的领域中，很少有词汇能像“polemic”这样引发如此多的兴趣和争议。“polemic”指的是对某人或某事的强烈口头或书面攻击，通常以激烈的论点为特征，旨在驳斥或批评对立观点。理解这个术语的重要性不仅在于它的定义，还在于它在政治、宗教和社会问题等各个领域的应用。历史上，“polemic”文学在塑造公众舆论和影响社会规范方面发挥了至关重要的作用。例如，在宗教改革期间，马丁·路德针对天主教会的“polemic”著作对支持新教的运动起到了重要作用。他的作品充满了热情的论证和尖锐的批评，充分展示了“polemic”如何成为变革的催化剂。同样，在当代社会，我们目睹围绕气候变化的“polemic”辩论，科学家和活动家参与激烈讨论，挑战气候否认者的怀疑，旨在说服公众迫切需要采取行动。“polemic”话语的性质往往导致意见的极化。虽然有些人可能将其视为倡导和社会正义的必要工具，但其他人可能将其视为分裂和无益的。这种二元性引发了关于“polemic”在建设性对话中角色的重要问题。一个“polemic”的方法是否能促进理解，还是仅仅加剧分歧？答案可能在于论证的意图和表达。例如，一个根植于尊重和真诚希望理解对立观点的“polemic”可以引导出富有成效的讨论。另一方面，旨在贬低或妖魔化对手的尖锐“polemic”可能会创造敌对的氛围，最终妨碍有效沟通。因此，“polemic”论证的有效性取决于激情与礼貌之间的平衡。此外，社交媒体的兴起改变了“polemic”话语的格局。像Twitter和Facebook这样的平台允许快速传播“polemic”论点，通常放大极端观点并促进回音室现象。这一现象可能加剧冲突，因为个人主要接触到强化自己信念的观点。因此，挑战不仅在于参与“polemic”讨论，而在于以鼓励开放思维和批判性思考的方式进行讨论。总之，术语“polemic”概括了热情论证的本质，既是倡导的工具，也是潜在的分裂源。理解其含义对任何寻求驾驭当代话语复杂性的人来说都是至关重要的。当我们参与“polemic”讨论时，让我们努力在热情和尊重之间找到平衡，认识到最终目标应该是促进理解和进步，而不仅仅是赢得争论。通过这样做，我们可以利用“polemic”的力量来激励变革，同时促进不同观点之间更具包容性和同理心的对话。