rearm

简明释义

英[riˈɑːm]美[riˈɑːrm]

vi. 重新武装，重整军备

vt. 使重整军备，使重新武装

第 三 人 称 单 数 r e a r m s

现 在 分 词 r e a r m i n g

过 去 式 r e a r m e d

过 去 分 词 r e a r m e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The Hussein dynasty will not -- as it would have, absent the U.S. invasion -- rebuild, rearm and threaten the world.

侯赛因的王朝将不会再恢复元气，重新武装，威胁世界的和平，当然没有美国的干预，这一切原本将要发生。

2.The country was forbidden to rearm under the terms of the treaty.

根据条约规定，这个国家不允许重新武装。

3.The attempt to disarm continued after the need to rearm became apparent.

测试袪除武装在须要重整武备从此不断变得明白。

4.The Hussein dynasty will not -- as it would have, absent the U.S. invasion -- rebuild, rearm and threaten the world.

侯赛因的王朝将不会再恢复元气，重新武装，威胁世界的和平，当然没有美国的干预，这一切原本将要发生。

5.They neglected to rearm in time and left the country exposed to disaster.

他们由于疏忽而没有及时重整军备，结果使该国面临灾难。

6.Mr Kony may be selling the food aid he receives to rearm.

Kony先生可能正在出售他收到的食物救济来重新武装。

7.The government announced plans to rearm 重新装备 the navy with modern ships.

政府宣布计划重新装备海军，配备现代化舰艇。

8.The arms treaty was designed to prevent nations from seeking to rearm 重新武装 after disarmament.

该武器条约旨在防止各国在裁军后寻求重新武装。

9.In order to face new threats, the organization had to rearm 重新武装 itself with better technology.

为了应对新威胁，该组织必须重新武装自己，采用更好的技术。

10.After the conflict, the country decided to rearm 重新武装 its military forces to ensure national security.

在冲突之后，该国决定重新武装其军队以确保国家安全。

11.The rebels planned to rearm 重新武装 themselves before launching another attack.

叛乱者计划在发起另一次攻击之前重新武装自己。

作文

In a world that is constantly changing, nations often find themselves in situations where they must reconsider their defense strategies. One such term that frequently arises in discussions about military strategy is rearm, which refers to the act of re-equipping or rearming military forces with new weapons or technology. This concept has been particularly relevant in recent years as geopolitical tensions have escalated across various regions. Countries that feel threatened may choose to rearm to ensure their security and maintain a balance of power. The decision to rearm is not taken lightly. It involves significant financial investment and a thorough assessment of the existing military capabilities. For instance, after the Cold War, many nations began to rearm due to the rise of new threats that emerged in the form of terrorism and cyber warfare. Traditional military strategies needed to be adapted to address these modern challenges effectively. Moreover, the process of rearming can also lead to an arms race, where one nation’s efforts to enhance its military capabilities prompt neighboring countries to do the same. This cycle can create an atmosphere of distrust and fear, leading to increased military spending and potentially destabilizing regions. Historical examples, such as the arms race during the Cold War, illustrate how rearming can escalate tensions between rival nations. Additionally, the act of rearming is not solely about acquiring new weapons; it also encompasses training personnel and developing new strategies to utilize these advancements effectively. A well-equipped military is only as effective as the individuals who operate it. Therefore, nations often invest in training programs to ensure that their forces are prepared to use new technologies in combat situations. Furthermore, the implications of rearming extend beyond national borders. International relations can be significantly affected by a country's decision to rearm. Allies may feel compelled to support each other in light of perceived threats, while adversaries may view this as an aggressive move, prompting them to bolster their own defenses. Diplomatic negotiations often become more complex when one country is in the process of rearming, as it can alter the power dynamics in the region. In conclusion, the term rearm encapsulates a critical aspect of military strategy that has far-reaching consequences. As nations navigate the complexities of global security, the decision to rearm reflects not only their immediate needs for defense but also their long-term vision for peace and stability. Understanding the nuances of this term is essential for comprehending the broader implications of military policy in today's world. As we move forward, it remains crucial for nations to approach the concept of rearming with caution, ensuring that it serves as a means of protection rather than provocation. By fostering dialogue and cooperation, nations can work towards a more secure future without resorting to an endless cycle of rearming that ultimately leads to conflict.

在一个不断变化的世界中，各国常常发现自己面临重新考虑防御策略的情况。军事战略讨论中经常出现的一个术语是rearm，它指的是重新装备或重新武装军事力量以获得新武器或技术的行为。近年来，随着各个地区地缘政治紧张局势的升级，这一概念变得尤为相关。感到威胁的国家可能会选择rearm以确保其安全并维持权力平衡。做出rearm的决定并非轻而易举。这涉及到重大的财政投资和对现有军事能力的全面评估。例如，在冷战结束后，许多国家开始rearm，因为恐怖主义和网络战争等新兴威胁的出现。传统的军事策略需要适应这些现代挑战，以有效应对。此外，rearm的过程也可能导致军备竞赛，一个国家增强军事能力的努力促使邻国也采取相应措施。这种循环可能会造成不信任和恐惧的氛围，导致军事开支增加，并可能使地区不稳定。历史例子，如冷战期间的军备竞赛，说明了rearm如何加剧敌对国家之间的紧张关系。此外，rearm不仅仅是获取新武器；它还包括培训人员和制定新策略，以有效利用这些进展。装备精良的军队只有在操作它的个人有效时才会发挥作用。因此，各国通常会投资于培训项目，以确保他们的部队准备好在作战情况下使用新技术。此外，rearm的影响超越国界。一个国家决定rearm可能会显著影响国际关系。盟友可能会感到有必要在面临潜在威胁时相互支持，而对手可能将此视为一种侵略行为，促使他们加强自己的防御。当一个国家正在进行rearm时，外交谈判往往变得更加复杂，因为这可能改变该地区的权力动态。总之，术语rearm概括了军事战略的一个关键方面，其后果深远。随着各国在全球安全的复杂性中航行，决定rearm不仅反映了他们对防御的迫切需求，也反映了他们对和平与稳定的长期愿景。理解这一术语的细微差别对于理解当今世界军事政策的更广泛影响至关重要。随着我们向前发展，各国必须谨慎对待rearm的概念，确保它作为保护的手段，而不是挑衅。通过促进对话与合作，各国可以共同努力，朝着更安全的未来迈进，而不必诉诸于无休止的rearm循环，这最终只会导致冲突。