valid

简明释义

英[ˈvælɪd]美[ˈvælɪd]

adj. （文件或票证）有效的；正当的，合理的；合法有效的；计算机系统接受的，被计算机系统认为有效的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The court ruled that laws passed by the assembly remained valid.

该法庭裁定由议会通过的法律仍然有效。

2.An analysis based on such assumptions could be valid for a highly competitive, individualistic society.

基于这种假设的分析可能对一个高度竞争、个人主义的社会有效。

3.The London Travel Card is a paper ticket that is valid on all London public transport.

伦敦旅游卡是一张纸质票，在伦敦所有公共交通工具上都有效。

4.Here's the ticket for not having a valid license.

这是对未持有有效执照的罚单。

5.All tickets are valid for two months.

所有的票在两个月内有效。

6.They put forward many valid reasons for not exporting.

他们提出了许多有根据的理由来反对出口。

7.The coupon you have is no longer valid.

你拥有的优惠券已经不再有效。

8.He provided a valid reason for his absence.

他给出了一个合理的缺席理由。

9.Her argument was not valid in the context of the discussion.

她的论点在讨论的背景下并不有效。

10.Make sure your passport is valid before you travel.

确保你的护照是有效的，在你旅行之前。

11.You need a valid driver's license to rent a car.

你需要一张有效的驾驶执照才能租车。

作文

In today's world, the concept of a valid argument is crucial in both academic and everyday discussions. A valid argument is one that is logically sound and well-supported by evidence. Understanding what makes an argument valid can greatly enhance our critical thinking skills and improve our ability to communicate effectively. To illustrate this point, consider a debate about climate change. One might argue that human activity is the primary cause of climate change. To make this argument valid, it should be supported by scientific data. For instance, studies showing a correlation between industrial emissions and rising global temperatures would strengthen the argument. Without such evidence, the argument remains weak and unconvincing.Moreover, a valid argument must also consider counterarguments. This means acknowledging opposing views and providing rebuttals. For example, some may argue that climate change is a natural phenomenon. A valid response would involve presenting evidence that highlights the unprecedented rate of change observed in recent decades, which cannot be solely attributed to natural cycles.In addition to logical reasoning and evidence, clarity is essential for an argument to be valid. If the points made are convoluted or ambiguous, the audience may struggle to understand the argument, regardless of its inherent validity. Therefore, effective communication plays a key role in ensuring that an argument is both valid and persuasive.Furthermore, the concept of validity extends beyond arguments. In various fields, including law and science, the term valid is often used to describe rules, procedures, and findings. For instance, a valid contract in legal terms must meet certain criteria to be enforceable. Similarly, scientific experiments must follow rigorous protocols to ensure that their results are valid and can be replicated by others.In conclusion, understanding what constitutes a valid argument is essential for anyone looking to engage in meaningful discourse. It requires logical reasoning, solid evidence, acknowledgment of counterarguments, and clear communication. By honing these skills, we can contribute to more productive discussions and foster a deeper understanding of complex issues. Whether in academic settings, professional environments, or casual conversations, striving for valid arguments will ultimately lead to more informed decisions and a better society.

在当今世界，valid（有效的）论点的概念在学术和日常讨论中都是至关重要的。valid（有效的）论点是一个逻辑上合理且有证据支持的论点。理解什么构成一个论点的valid（有效性）可以极大地增强我们的批判性思维能力，并改善我们有效沟通的能力。为了说明这一点，考虑一下关于气候变化的辩论。有人可能会争辩说，人类活动是气候变化的主要原因。为了使这个论点valid（有效），它应该有科学数据作为支持。例如，显示工业排放与全球温度上升之间存在关联的研究将增强该论点。如果没有这样的证据，论点仍然薄弱且缺乏说服力。此外，一个valid（有效的）论点还必须考虑反驳意见。这意味着承认对立观点并提供反驳。例如，有人可能会争辩说气候变化是自然现象。一个valid（有效的）回应将涉及提出证据，强调近年来观察到的变化速度前所未有，这不能仅归因于自然周期。除了逻辑推理和证据之外，清晰性对于论点的valid（有效性）也至关重要。如果提出的观点复杂或模糊，观众可能会难以理解论点，无论其内在的有效性如何。因此，有效的沟通在确保论点既valid（有效）又具有说服力方面发挥着关键作用。此外，validity（有效性）的概念超越了论点。在法律和科学等各个领域，valid（有效的）一词通常用来描述规则、程序和发现。例如，在法律术语中，valid（有效的）合同必须满足某些标准才能具有可执行性。同样，科学实验必须遵循严格的协议，以确保其结果是valid（有效的）并且可以被他人复制。总之，理解什么构成一个valid（有效的）论点对于任何希望参与有意义讨论的人来说都是必不可少的。这需要逻辑推理、扎实的证据、对反驳意见的承认以及清晰的沟通。通过磨练这些技能，我们可以为更具生产力的讨论做出贡献，并加深对复杂问题的理解。无论是在学术环境、专业环境还是随意的对话中，追求valid（有效的）论点最终将导致更明智的决策和更好的社会。