credibleness

简明释义

英[/ˈkrɛdɪb(ə)l.nəs/]美[/ˈkrɛdɪb(ə)lnəs/]

n. 可信度，可靠性

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.OTC Suzhou promises to work under the principle of "Friendliness, Credibleness and Considerateness", and to provide the best service to every customer.

苏州海外旅游有限公司以“友好、守信、热诚、周到”为服务宗旨，热忱为旅游者提供最优质的服务。

2.OTC Suzhou promises to work under the principle of "Friendliness, Credibleness and Considerateness", and to provide the best service to every customer.

苏州海外旅游有限公司以“友好、守信、热诚、周到”为服务宗旨，热忱为旅游者提供最优质的服务。

3.The professor's lecture on ethics highlighted the importance of credibleness 可信度 in academic writing.

教授关于伦理的讲座强调了学术写作中credibleness 可信度的重要性。

4.In today's digital age, the credibleness 可信度 of online sources is often scrutinized.

在今天的数字时代，在线来源的credibleness 可信度常常受到审查。

5.The scientist's research was questioned due to the lack of credibleness 可信度 in the data presented.

由于所提供数据缺乏credibleness 可信度，科学家的研究受到了质疑。

6.The journalist emphasized the credibleness 可信度 of her sources in order to maintain her integrity.

这位记者强调了她的信息来源的credibleness 可信度，以保持她的诚信。

7.A company's credibleness 可信度 can greatly influence consumer trust and loyalty.

一家公司的credibleness 可信度可以极大地影响消费者的信任和忠诚度。

作文

In today's world, where information travels faster than ever, the importance of credibleness (可信性) cannot be overstated. People are bombarded with news articles, social media posts, and various forms of digital content every day. However, not all of this information is accurate or trustworthy. This raises a critical question: how do we determine the credibleness (可信性) of the information we consume? To begin with, it is essential to evaluate the sources of information. Reliable sources typically have a long-standing reputation for accuracy and integrity. For instance, established news organizations like BBC, The New York Times, and Reuters have rigorous fact-checking processes in place, which enhance their credibleness (可信性). On the other hand, social media platforms often host a plethora of unverified information that can mislead readers. Therefore, understanding the background of the source is a crucial step in assessing credibleness (可信性).Moreover, cross-referencing information is another effective way to gauge credibleness (可信性). If multiple reputable sources report the same story, the likelihood of its accuracy increases significantly. For example, during major events like elections or natural disasters, various news outlets will cover the situation. By comparing their reports, one can form a more comprehensive and reliable understanding of the facts. This practice not only enhances our knowledge but also builds our ability to discern credibleness (可信性) in future encounters with information.Additionally, the author's expertise should be considered when evaluating credibleness (可信性). An article written by a subject matter expert is generally more trustworthy than one penned by someone without relevant qualifications. Academic journals, for instance, are peer-reviewed, ensuring that the research presented has undergone scrutiny by experts in the field. Therefore, recognizing the credentials of authors can significantly aid in determining the credibleness (可信性) of the content.Furthermore, the presence of citations and references is another indicator of credibleness (可信性). Well-researched articles often provide links to original studies, data, or other credible sources. This transparency allows readers to verify claims independently, thereby enhancing the overall trustworthiness of the information. In contrast, articles lacking citations may indicate a lack of rigor and should be approached with caution.Lastly, critical thinking plays a vital role in assessing credibleness (可信性). Readers must cultivate the habit of questioning the information they encounter. Asking oneself questions such as "What evidence supports this claim?" or "Is there an agenda behind this information?" can lead to a deeper understanding of the content's reliability. By developing these analytical skills, individuals can better navigate the vast sea of information available today, ultimately leading to more informed decisions.In conclusion, the credibleness (可信性) of information is paramount in our information-driven society. By evaluating sources, cross-referencing facts, considering authors' expertise, checking for citations, and employing critical thinking, we can enhance our ability to discern trustworthy information from misinformation. As consumers of information, it is our responsibility to seek out credibleness (可信性) in everything we read and share, ensuring that we contribute to a well-informed society.

在当今这个信息传播速度比以往任何时候都快的世界里，credibleness（可信性）的重要性不容小觑。人们每天都被新闻文章、社交媒体帖子和各种形式的数字内容轰炸。然而，并非所有这些信息都是准确或值得信赖的。这引发了一个关键问题：我们如何判断所消费信息的credibleness（可信性）？首先，评估信息来源至关重要。可靠的来源通常具有长期的准确性和诚信声誉。例如，像BBC、《纽约时报》和路透社这样的知名新闻机构都有严格的事实核查流程，这增强了它们的credibleness（可信性）。另一方面，社交媒体平台上常常充斥着大量未经验证的信息，可能会误导读者。因此，了解来源的背景是评估credibleness（可信性）的关键步骤。此外，交叉引用信息是另一个有效评估credibleness（可信性）的方法。如果多个可靠来源报道同一事件，其准确性的可能性就大大增加。例如，在选举或自然灾害等重大事件期间，各种新闻机构都会对此进行报道。通过比较它们的报道，个人可以形成更全面和可靠的事实理解。这种做法不仅增强了我们的知识，也提高了我们在未来遇到信息时辨别credibleness（可信性）的能力。此外，作者的专业知识在评估credibleness（可信性）时也应考虑。由主题专家撰写的文章通常比没有相关资格的人撰写的文章更值得信赖。例如，学术期刊经过同行评审，确保所呈现的研究经过领域内专家的审查。因此，识别作者的资质可以显著帮助确定内容的credibleness（可信性）。此外，引用和参考文献的存在是credibleness（可信性）的另一个指标。经过充分研究的文章通常提供原始研究、数据或其他可信来源的链接。这种透明度使读者能够独立验证主张，从而增强信息的整体可信度。相比之下，缺乏引用的文章可能表明缺乏严谨性，应谨慎对待。最后，批判性思维在评估credibleness（可信性）中发挥着至关重要的作用。读者必须培养质疑所遇到的信息的习惯。问自己“这个主张有什么证据支持？”或“这条信息背后是否有议程？”等问题，可以导致对内容可靠性的更深入理解。通过发展这些分析技能，个人可以更好地驾驭当今可用的信息海洋，最终做出更明智的决策。总之，在信息驱动的社会中，信息的credibleness（可信性）至关重要。通过评估来源、交叉引用事实、考虑作者的专业知识、检查引用以及运用批判性思维，我们可以增强辨别可信信息与虚假信息的能力。作为信息的消费者，我们有责任在阅读和分享的一切中寻找credibleness（可信性），确保我们为一个信息充分的社会做出贡献。