toadyism
简明释义
n. 奉承,拍马屁;谄媚
英英释义
The act of being excessively flattering or ingratiating towards someone in power, often for personal gain. | 对有权势的人过分恭维或迎合的行为,通常是为了个人利益。 |
单词用法
参与谄媚行为 | |
批评谄媚行为 | |
谄媚文化 | |
对权威的谄媚 | |
谄媚的危险 | |
职场中的谄媚 |
同义词
反义词
例句
1.I always use my clients' products. This is not toadyism but elementary good manners.
我总是用客户的产品。这并不是谄媚奉承,而是良好的基本态度。
2.I always use my clients' products. This is not toadyism but elementary good manners.
我总是用客户的产品。这并不是谄媚奉承,而是良好的基本态度。
3.This is not toadyism but elementary good manners.
这并不是谄媚奉承,而是良好的基本态度。
4.The politician's toadyism towards wealthy donors was evident during the campaign.
这位政治家对富裕捐赠者的迎合在竞选期间显而易见。
5.His constant flattery of the boss was seen as nothing more than toadyism.
他对老板的不断恭维被视为纯粹的拍马屁。
6.She couldn't stand the toadyism of her colleagues who constantly sought the manager's approval.
她无法忍受同事们为了获得经理的认可而不断进行的谄媚。
7.Many believe that toadyism undermines genuine teamwork and collaboration.
许多人认为,谄媚破坏了真正的团队合作与协作。
8.In the office, toadyism often leads to promotions for those who are less qualified.
在办公室,阿谀奉承往往使得那些不太合格的人获得晋升。
作文
Toadyism is a term that refers to the act of ingratiating oneself with someone in power, often through flattery or subservience. This behavior can be observed in various settings, from corporate environments to political arenas. In many cases, individuals engage in toadyism to gain favor or secure advantages, rather than relying on their own merits or abilities. The consequences of such behavior can be detrimental not only to the individual but also to the larger organization or community. In the workplace, for instance, employees who practice toadyism may undermine their colleagues by excessively praising their superiors or by engaging in gossip to discredit others. This creates a toxic environment where genuine talent and hard work are overshadowed by sycophantic behavior. Over time, this can lead to a culture where mediocrity is rewarded, and innovation is stifled. Employees may feel demoralized, knowing that their contributions are not valued as much as the ability to flatter those in charge. Similarly, in politics, toadyism can have far-reaching implications. Politicians who surround themselves with sycophants may become disconnected from the needs and concerns of their constituents. This detachment can result in policies that do not reflect the will of the people, ultimately eroding public trust in leadership. When leaders prioritize loyalty over competence, the quality of governance diminishes, leading to ineffective administration and potential corruption. Moreover, toadyism can create an environment where dissenting voices are silenced. When individuals feel that they must conform to the dominant narrative or please those in power, critical thinking and honest dialogue are stifled. This can hinder progress and innovation, as new ideas are often met with resistance from those who prefer the status quo. A culture of toadyism discourages creativity and promotes conformity, which can be particularly damaging in fields that rely on fresh perspectives and innovative solutions. In contrast, organizations and communities that foster open communication and encourage diverse viewpoints tend to thrive. When individuals are empowered to express their opinions without fear of retribution, it leads to a more dynamic and resilient environment. Leaders who value honesty and integrity over flattery create a culture of trust, where employees feel valued for their contributions. This not only boosts morale but also enhances productivity and creativity. In conclusion, while toadyism may offer short-term benefits to those who engage in it, the long-term consequences can be detrimental to both individuals and organizations. It is essential to recognize and challenge this behavior to cultivate a healthier, more productive environment. By promoting authenticity and valuing merit over sycophancy, we can create spaces where everyone has the opportunity to succeed based on their true abilities. Ultimately, rejecting toadyism in favor of genuine collaboration and respect will lead to more sustainable success and fulfillment for all involved.
拍马屁主义是一个指通过奉承或奴颜婢膝的方式来迎合权力者的行为。这样的行为可以在各种环境中观察到,从企业环境到政治领域。在许多情况下,个人通过参与拍马屁主义来获得青睐或确保优势,而不是依靠自己的优点或能力。这种行为的后果不仅对个人有害,也对更大的组织或社区产生负面影响。例如,在工作场所,实践拍马屁主义的员工可能通过过度赞美上司或通过八卦来诋毁他人,从而破坏同事之间的关系。这造成了一个有毒的环境,在这里,真正的才华和努力工作被谄媚的行为所掩盖。随着时间的推移,这可能导致一种文化,在这种文化中,平庸被奖励,创新被压制。员工可能会感到士气低落,因为他们知道自己的贡献并不像取悦上司的能力那样受到重视。同样,在政治中,拍马屁主义可能产生深远的影响。围绕着自己身边全是谄媚者的政治家可能会与选民的需求和关切脱节。这种脱节可能导致不反映人民意愿的政策,最终侵蚀公众对领导的信任。当领导者优先考虑忠诚而非能力时,治理质量下降,导致管理无效和潜在腐败。此外,拍马屁主义可能会创造一个压制异议声音的环境。当个人感到必须顺应主流叙事或取悦权力者时,批判性思维和诚实对话就会受到抑制。这可能阻碍进步和创新,因为新想法往往会遭到那些偏好现状的人的抵制。拍马屁主义的文化抑制创造力,促进一致性,这在依赖新视角和创新解决方案的领域尤其有害。相反,培养开放沟通和鼓励多样化观点的组织和社区往往会蓬勃发展。当个人能够在没有报复恐惧的情况下表达意见时,会导致更加动态和有韧性的环境。重视诚实和正直而非奉承的领导者创造了一种信任的文化,在这种文化中,员工因其贡献而感到被重视。这不仅提升了士气,还增强了生产力和创造力。总之,虽然拍马屁主义可能为参与其中的人提供短期利益,但其长期后果可能对个人和组织都是有害的。识别和挑战这种行为对于培养更健康、更具生产力的环境至关重要。通过促进真实性和重视优点而非谄媚,我们可以创造一个每个人都有机会根据自己的真实能力取得成功的空间。最终,拒绝拍马屁主义,而选择真诚的合作和尊重,将为所有参与者带来更可持续的成功和满足感。