substantialism

简明释义

英[səbˈstænʃəˌlɪzəm]美[səbˈstænʃəlɪzm]

n. 实体论；本体论

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.In Lawrence 's works, intuition and instinct are used as sharp weapons in his criticism of industrial civilization and his introspection and criticism of humanism in modern substantialism.

同时表明直觉和本能在劳伦斯笔下，不仅成为批判工业文明的锐利武器，而且还对近代本质主义的人本主义思维进行反思和批判。

2.In Lawrence 's works, intuition and instinct are used as sharp weapons in his criticism of industrial civilization and his introspection and criticism of humanism in modern substantialism.

同时表明直觉和本能在劳伦斯笔下，不仅成为批判工业文明的锐利武器，而且还对近代本质主义的人本主义思维进行反思和批判。

3.Heidegger's transcendence of substantialism is of great philosophical significance.

海德格尔对实体主义的超越具有重要的哲学意义。

4.The debate between substantialism and relationalism has been ongoing in metaphysics for decades.

在形而上学中，实质主义与关系主义之间的辩论已经持续了几十年。

5.In science, substantialism can be seen in discussions about the nature of matter.

在科学中，实质主义可以在关于物质本质的讨论中看到。

6.Critics of substantialism believe it overlooks the importance of relationships in defining entities.

批评实质主义的人认为，它忽视了在定义实体时关系的重要性。

7.In philosophy, substantialism refers to the belief that substances are the fundamental reality of existence.

在哲学中，实质主义指的是物质是存在的基本现实的信念。

8.Some argue that substantialism provides a clearer understanding of identity over time.

一些人认为，实质主义提供了对时间中身份更清晰的理解。

作文

In the realm of philosophy, the term substantialism refers to the belief that reality is fundamentally composed of substances. This perspective posits that substances are the primary entities that exist independently and have distinct characteristics. To better understand substantialism, it is crucial to explore its implications across various domains, including metaphysics, epistemology, and ethics. Metaphysically, substantialism challenges us to consider what constitutes the essence of things. For instance, in a world filled with change and flux, substantialists argue that there must be underlying substances that persist through transformations. This leads to the question of what these substances are and how they interact with one another. In contrast to nominalism, which denies the existence of universal substances, substantialism asserts that these entities possess inherent qualities that define their nature.Epistemologically, substantialism influences our understanding of knowledge. If we accept that substances exist independently, then our pursuit of knowledge becomes an exploration of these fundamental entities. This raises important questions about how we can know these substances and the extent to which our perceptions reflect their true nature. Moreover, substantialism suggests that knowledge is not merely a collection of ideas or concepts but rather a deep engagement with the underlying substances that shape our reality.Ethically, substantialism can have profound implications for how we view moral principles and values. If we believe in the existence of substantial entities, we may also posit that certain moral truths are rooted in the nature of these substances. This could lead to a more objective understanding of ethics, as opposed to relativistic views that suggest morality is merely a social construct. For example, if human beings are considered substantial entities with intrinsic value, this could inform our ethical obligations toward one another and the environment.However, substantialism is not without its critiques. Some philosophers argue that this perspective can lead to a rigid understanding of reality, limiting our ability to embrace the complexities and interdependencies of existence. Critics contend that an overemphasis on substances can overshadow the dynamic relationships between entities and the contexts in which they exist. Therefore, while substantialism provides a compelling framework for understanding reality, it is essential to balance this view with an appreciation for the relational aspects of existence.In conclusion, substantialism offers a rich philosophical lens through which we can examine the nature of reality, knowledge, and ethics. By recognizing the importance of substances as foundational elements of existence, we can deepen our understanding of the world around us. Nevertheless, it is crucial to remain open to alternative perspectives that challenge the limitations of substantialist thought. Ultimately, the dialogue between substantialism and its critiques can lead to a more nuanced and comprehensive understanding of the complexities of life.

在哲学领域，术语substantialism指的是一种信念，即现实在根本上由实体构成。这一观点认为，实体是独立存在的主要实体，具有独特的特征。为了更好地理解substantialism，我们必须探讨其在形而上学、认识论和伦理学等各个领域的影响。在形而上学上，substantialism挑战我们思考事物的本质是什么。例如，在一个充满变化和波动的世界中，实体主义者认为必须存在一些基本的实体，它们在变革中依然存在。这引发了关于这些实体是什么以及它们之间如何相互作用的问题。与否定普遍实体存在的名义主义相对，substantialism主张这些实体具有定义其本质的内在特性。在认识论上，substantialism影响我们对知识的理解。如果我们接受实体独立存在的观点，那么我们追求知识的过程就变成了对这些基本实体的探索。这提出了重要的问题，即我们如何能够认识到这些实体，以及我们的感知在多大程度上反映了它们的真实本质。此外，substantialism表明，知识不仅仅是思想或概念的集合，而是与塑造我们现实的基本实体的深层互动。在伦理学上，substantialism可能对我们如何看待道德原则和价值观产生深远的影响。如果我们相信实体的存在，我们也可能假设某些道德真理根植于这些实体的本质。这可能导致对伦理的更客观理解，而不是建议道德仅仅是社会构建的相对主义观点。例如，如果人类被视为具有内在价值的实体，这可能会影响我们对彼此和环境的伦理义务。然而，substantialism并非没有批评。一些哲学家认为，这种观点可能导致对现实的僵化理解，限制了我们接受存在的复杂性和相互依赖性的能力。批评者争辩说，过分强调实体可能掩盖实体之间的动态关系及其存在的背景。因此，尽管substantialism为理解现实提供了一个引人注目的框架，但平衡这一观点与对存在关系方面的欣赏是至关重要的。总之，substantialism提供了一种丰富的哲学视角，使我们能够审视现实、知识和伦理的本质。通过认识到实体作为存在的基础元素的重要性，我们可以加深对周围世界的理解。然而，保持对挑战实体主义思想局限性的替代观点的开放态度也至关重要。最终，substantialism与其批评之间的对话可以导致对生活复杂性的更加细致和全面的理解。