counterplea

简明释义

[ˈkaʊntəpliː][ˈkaʊntərˌpliː]

n. 抗辩;[法] 反驳

英英释义

A counterplea is a legal term referring to a response or argument made by a defendant in opposition to a plea or claim made by the plaintiff.

反诉是一个法律术语,指的是被告对原告提出的诉求或主张所作出的回应或论点。

单词用法

file a counterplea

提交反诉

submit a counterplea

提交反诉

raise a counterplea

提出反诉

counterplea to the claim

对索赔的反诉

counterplea in response to

作为回应的反诉

counterplea against the plaintiff

针对原告的反诉

同义词

rebuttal

反驳

The lawyer presented a strong rebuttal to the accusations.

律师对指控提出了有力的反驳。

defense

辩护

In court, the defense argued that the evidence was insufficient.

在法庭上,辩护方辩称证据不足。

response

回应

Her response to the claims was well-prepared and convincing.

她对这些主张的回应准备充分,令人信服。

反义词

plea

请求;恳求

The defendant made a plea for leniency.

被告请求宽大处理。

affirmative

肯定的;确认的

The jury returned an affirmative verdict.

陪审团做出了肯定的裁决。

例句

1.Establishing the system of the right of uneasy counterplea plays a positive role on defending trade order and ensuring trade safety.

不安抗辩权制度的设立,对维护交易秩序、保障交易安全起了积极作用。

2.In the civil law, it is embodied in the right for unstable counterplea, in Anglo-American law it is reflected in the right for the anticipatory breach of contract.

在大陆法系体现为不安抗辩权制度,在英美法系则体现为预期违约制度。

3.This paper makes an analysis into the significance of jurisdiction over arbitration, the counterplea and its adjudication, and the conflict between the tribunal and the court and its coordination.

文章就仲裁管辖权的意义、抗辩、抗辩的裁决方式、抗辩的确认以及仲裁管辖权与法院管辖权的冲突与协调等问题试作分析探讨。

4.Part four of this paper compares doctrines of uneasy counterplea right and anticipatory breach of contract on account of their similarities.

由于预期违约制度和不安抗辩权制度非常相似,本文的第四部分对不安抗辩权制度与预期违约制度进行了比较;

5.In practice, it is important to use coincident performance counterplea properly. It has great significance to maintain order of transaction and guarantee security of transaction.

在实践中如何正确适用同时履行抗辩权,对于维护交易秩序、保障交易安全,有着至关重要的意义。

6.Thus, we must strengthen the publicity of the law for bill of exchange, develop the counterplea limitation system and perfect the legislation of bill of exchange to ensure the circ.

为此 ,只有加强票据法的学习宣传 ,强力推进票据抗辩限制制度 ,完善我国票据立法 ,才能保证票据的安全流通。

7.The main difference lies in the different understandings of the effects of judicial prescription. It is good to adopt counterplea.

通过对诉讼时效效力的深入分析,认为诉讼时效的效力应采用抗辩权发生主义为妥。

8.This paper makes an analysis into the significance of jurisdiction over arbitration, the counterplea and its adjudication, and the conflict between the tribunal and the court and its coordination.

文章就仲裁管辖权的意义、抗辩、抗辩的裁决方式、抗辩的确认以及仲裁管辖权与法院管辖权的冲突与协调等问题试作分析探讨。

9.The judge reviewed the counterplea before making a decision on the case.

法官在对案件做出决定之前审查了这份反诉状

10.In response to the lawsuit, the company filed a counterplea asserting that the contract was void.

作为对诉讼的回应,该公司提交了一份反诉状,主张合同无效。

11.After receiving the counterplea, the opposing party had 30 days to respond.

在收到这份反诉状后,对方有30天的时间进行回应。

12.Her counterplea included evidence that contradicted the plaintiff's allegations.

她的反诉状中包含了与原告指控相矛盾的证据。

13.The defendant's lawyer submitted a counterplea to challenge the prosecution's claims.

被告的律师提交了一份反诉状以挑战检方的指控。

作文

In the legal world, the term counterplea refers to a response or defense made by a defendant against a claim made by a plaintiff. It is an essential component of the adversarial system in which two parties present their arguments and evidence before a neutral judge or jury. Understanding the concept of counterplea is crucial for anyone interested in law, as it highlights the dynamics of legal disputes and the importance of effective communication in the courtroom.When a plaintiff files a lawsuit, they present their case with specific allegations and claims. In response, the defendant has the right to submit a counterplea, which serves to refute or challenge the plaintiff's assertions. This response can take various forms, including denying the allegations outright, providing an alternative explanation, or asserting legal defenses that justify the defendant's actions.For instance, consider a case where a person sues another for breach of contract. The plaintiff may argue that the defendant failed to fulfill their obligations under the agreement. In this scenario, the defendant might submit a counterplea claiming that the plaintiff did not meet their own obligations, thus nullifying the contract. This back-and-forth exchange is a fundamental aspect of the legal process, allowing both sides to present their viewpoints and supporting evidence.Moreover, a counterplea can also introduce new facts or legal theories that were not initially presented by the plaintiff. This can significantly impact the outcome of a case, as it may shift the focus of the court's attention and lead to new considerations that could favor the defendant. For example, if the defendant can prove that the plaintiff engaged in fraudulent behavior, this information could potentially undermine the plaintiff's entire case.The importance of a well-crafted counterplea cannot be overstated. It requires a thorough understanding of the law, the ability to analyze the plaintiff's claims critically, and the skill to articulate a coherent and persuasive argument. Legal professionals must be adept at constructing these responses, as they play a pivotal role in shaping the direction of a case.In addition to its legal implications, the concept of counterplea can also be applied metaphorically in everyday life. In discussions or debates, individuals often find themselves in situations where they must respond to opposing viewpoints. Just as in a courtroom, presenting a counterplea in these scenarios involves addressing the other party's claims while simultaneously reinforcing one's own position. This skill is invaluable in various contexts, from academic discussions to professional negotiations.Ultimately, the term counterplea encapsulates the essence of legal discourse and the principle of fair representation. It underscores the notion that every party deserves the opportunity to defend themselves against accusations and to present their side of the story. As we navigate through life, understanding the dynamics of counterplea can enhance our ability to engage in constructive dialogue, resolve conflicts, and advocate for our beliefs effectively. Whether in a courtroom or a casual conversation, the principles behind a counterplea remind us of the importance of balance in communication and the pursuit of justice.

在法律界,术语counterplea指的是被告对原告提出的索赔所做出的回应或辩护。这是对抗性系统的重要组成部分,在该系统中,双方在中立的法官或陪审团面前陈述他们的论点和证据。理解counterplea的概念对于任何对法律感兴趣的人来说都是至关重要的,因为它突显了法律争议的动态以及在法庭上有效沟通的重要性。当原告提起诉讼时,他们会提出具体的指控和索赔。作为回应,被告有权提交一份counterplea,这有助于反驳或挑战原告的主张。这种回应可以采取多种形式,包括完全否认指控、提供替代解释或主张合法辩护来证明被告的行为是合理的。例如,考虑一个人因违反合同而起诉另一个人的案件。原告可能会辩称,被告未能履行合同中的义务。在这种情况下,被告可能会提交一份counterplea,声称原告没有履行自己的义务,从而使合同失效。这种来回交换是法律程序的基本方面,使双方都有机会提出各自的观点和支持证据。此外,counterplea还可以引入原告最初未提出的新事实或法律理论。这可能会对案件的结果产生重大影响,因为它可能会改变法庭的关注点,并引入新的考虑因素,从而有利于被告。例如,如果被告能够证明原告从事欺诈行为,这一信息可能会潜在地破坏原告整个案件的基础。一份精心制作的counterplea的重要性不容小觑。它需要对法律的透彻理解、批判性分析原告主张的能力,以及清晰有说服力地阐述论点的技能。法律专业人士必须善于构建这些回应,因为它们在塑造案件方向方面发挥着关键作用。除了其法律含义外,counterplea的概念在日常生活中也可以隐喻性地应用。在讨论或辩论中,个人经常发现自己处于必须回应对立观点的情境中。就像在法庭上一样,在这些场景中提出counterplea涉及到回应对方的主张,同时强化自己的立场。这项技能在各种背景下都是无价的,从学术讨论到职业谈判。归根结底,术语counterplea概括了法律话语的本质和公平代表原则。它强调每一方都有机会为自己辩护并陈述自己的故事的重要性。在我们生活中,理解counterplea的动态可以增强我们参与建设性对话、解决冲突和有效倡导自己信念的能力。无论是在法庭上还是在随意的谈话中,counterplea背后的原则都提醒我们沟通中的平衡和追求正义的重要性。